OBJECTIVE: To determine whether functional status near the time of discharge from acute care hospitalization is associated with acute care readmission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 9405 consecutive patients admitted from an acute care hospital to an inpatient rehabilitation facility between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012. Patients' functional status at admission to the rehabilitation facility was assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, and divided into low, middle, or high functional status. The main outcome was readmission to an acute care hospital within 30 days of acute care discharge (for all patients and by subgroup according to diagnostic group: medical, orthopedic, or neurologic). RESULTS: There were 1182 (13%) readmissions. FIM score was significantly associated with readmission, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for low and middle versus high FIM score category of 3.0 (2.5-3.6; P < 0.001) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.8; P < 0.001), respectively. This relationship between FIM score and readmission held across diagnostic category. Medical patients with low functional status had the highest readmission rate (OR: 29%; 95% CI: 25%-32%) and an adjusted OR for readmission of 3.2 (95% CI: 2.4-4.3, P < 0.001) compared to medical patients with high FIM scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility, functional status near the time of discharge from an acute care hospital is strongly associated with acute care readmission, particularly for medical patients with greater functional impairments. Reducing functional status decline during acute care hospitalization may be an important strategy to lower readmissions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether functional status near the time of discharge from acute care hospitalization is associated with acute care readmission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 9405 consecutive patients admitted from an acute care hospital to an inpatient rehabilitation facility between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012. Patients' functional status at admission to the rehabilitation facility was assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, and divided into low, middle, or high functional status. The main outcome was readmission to an acute care hospital within 30 days of acute care discharge (for all patients and by subgroup according to diagnostic group: medical, orthopedic, or neurologic). RESULTS: There were 1182 (13%) readmissions. FIM score was significantly associated with readmission, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for low and middle versus high FIM score category of 3.0 (2.5-3.6; P < 0.001) and 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.8; P < 0.001), respectively. This relationship between FIM score and readmission held across diagnostic category. Medical patients with low functional status had the highest readmission rate (OR: 29%; 95% CI: 25%-32%) and an adjusted OR for readmission of 3.2 (95% CI: 2.4-4.3, P < 0.001) compared to medical patients with high FIM scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility, functional status near the time of discharge from an acute care hospital is strongly associated with acute care readmission, particularly for medical patients with greater functional impairments. Reducing functional status decline during acute care hospitalization may be an important strategy to lower readmissions.
Authors: Chau-Chyun Sheu; Michelle N Gong; Rihong Zhai; Feng Chen; Ednan K Bajwa; Peter F Clardy; Diana C Gallagher; B Taylor Thompson; David C Christiani Journal: Chest Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Robert K Lord; Christopher R Mayhew; Radha Korupolu; Earl C Mantheiy; Michael A Friedman; Jeffrey B Palmer; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrew A Wong; James P Davis; Philip J Schluter; Robert D Henderson; John D O'Sullivan; Stephen J Read Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2005-10-27 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Polly Bailey; George E Thomsen; Vicki J Spuhler; Robert Blair; James Jewkes; Louise Bezdjian; Kristy Veale; Larissa Rodriquez; Ramona O Hopkins Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrea Gruneir; Irfan A Dhalla; Carl van Walraven; Hadas D Fischer; Ximena Camacho; Paula A Rochon; Geoffrey M Anderson Journal: Open Med Date: 2011-05-31
Authors: Addie Middleton; James E Graham; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin; Janet Prvu Bettger; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Heidi L Wald; Luci K Leykum; Melissa L P Mattison; Eduard E Vasilevskis; David O Meltzer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Hyo Jung Tak; Li-Wu Chen; Fernando A Wilson; Andrew M Goldsweig; Dmitry Oleynikov; Michael Hawking; Ya-Chen Tina Shih Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carmen E Capo-Lugo; Robert L Askew; Kathryn Muldoon; Matthew Maas; Eric Liotta; Shyam Prabhakaran; Andrew Naidech Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Katherine A Auger; Tamara D Simon; David Cooperberg; James Gay; Dennis Z Kuo; Michele Saysana; Christopher J Stille; Erin Stucky Fisher; Sowdhamini Wallace; Jay Berry; Daniel Coghlin; Vishu Jhaveri; Steven Kairys; Tina Logsdon; Ulfat Shaikh; Rajendu Srivastava; Amy J Starmer; Victoria Wilkins; Mark W Shen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Katie S Murray; Megan Prunty; Alex Henderson; Tyler Haden; Naveen Pokala; Bin Ge; Mark Wakefield; Gregory F Petroski; David R Mehr; Robin L Kruse Journal: Urology Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 2.649