Literature DB >> 24615948

Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.

K Svabik1, A Martan, J Masata, R El-Haddad, P Hubka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two standard surgical procedures for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse in patients with levator ani avulsion.
METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized interventional trial, of two standard surgical procedures for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: Prolift Total vs unilateral vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy with native tissue vaginal repair (sacrospinous fixation, SSF), during the period from 2008 to 2011. Entry criteria included at least two-compartment prolapse, as well as complete unilateral or bilateral levator ani avulsion injury. The primary outcome was anatomical failure based on clinical and ultrasound assessment. Failure was defined clinically, according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, as Ba, C or Bp at the hymen or below, and on translabial ultrasound as bladder descent to 10 mm or more below the lower margin of the symphysis pubis on maximum Valsalva maneuver. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of continence, sexual function and prolapse symptoms based on validated questionnaires.
RESULTS: During the study period, 142 patients who were post-hysterectomy underwent surgery for prolapse in our unit; 72 of these were diagnosed with an avulsion injury and were offered participation in the study. Seventy patients were randomized into two groups: 36 in the Prolift group and 34 in the SSF group. On clinical examination at 1-year follow-up, we observed one (3%) case of anatomical failure in the Prolift group and 22 (65%) in the SSF group (P < 0.001). Using ultrasound criteria, there was one (2.8%) failure in the Prolift group compared with 21 (61.8%) in the SSF group (P < 0.001). The postoperative POPDI (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory) score for subjective outcome was 15.3 in the Prolift group vs 21.7 in the SSF group (P = 0.16).
CONCLUSION: In patients with prolapse after hysterectomy and levator ani avulsion injury, SSF has a higher anatomical failure rate than does the Prolift Total procedure at 1-year follow-up.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D ultrasound; Prolift Total; SSF; levator avulsion; mesh; sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy; ultrasound assessment; vaginal prolapse surgery; vaginal sacrospinous fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615948     DOI: 10.1002/uog.13305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  12 in total

1.  Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse in The Netherlands: a clinical practice survey.

Authors:  Carolien K M Vermeulen; Anne Lotte W M Coolen; Wilbert A Spaans; Jan Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Relationship of postoperative vaginal anatomy and sexual function: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shunaha Kim-Fine; Danielle D Antosh; Ethan M Balk; Kate V Meriwether; Gregg Kanter; Alexis A Dieter; Mamta M Mamik; Meadow Good; Ruchira Singh; Alexandriah Alas; Mohamed Foda; David D Rahn; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Predicting levator avulsion from ICS POP-Q findings.

Authors:  Alejandro Pattillo Garnham; Rodrigo Guzmán Rojas; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.

Authors:  Sharif Ismail; Jonathan Duckett; Diaa Rizk; Olanrewaju Sorinola; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Oscar Contreras-Ortiz; Hazem Al-Mandeel; Kamil Svabik; Mitesh Parekh; Christian Phillips
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Yeung; Eva Malacova; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 1.932

7.  A long-term comparative study of Uphold™ transvaginal mesh kit against anterior colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Moshe Gillor; Susanne Langer; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ilias Giarenis; Dudley Robinson
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-09-04

Review 9.  Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Corina Christmann-Schmid; Nir Haya; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 10.  Reasons for and Against Use of Non-absorbable, Synthetic Mesh During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair, According to the Prolapsed Compartment.

Authors:  Stavros Kontogiannis; Evangelia Goulimi; Konstantinos Giannitsas
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.