PURPOSE: Hospital-acquired infections is a major concern affecting patient management, in which medical instruments and devices play an important role. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of bacterial contamination of the sonographic probe and describe an effective, safe, and practical decontamination method. METHODS: The study's sample consisted of 50 patients. Cultures were taken from the probe surface both after each examination and after the probes had been wiped clean with a dry, nonsterile paper towel. Cultures were also taken randomly from the coupling gel. RESULTS: Initial cultures were positive in 49 cases (98%) for aerobic and in 26 cases (52%) for anaerobic bacteria. Cultures obtained after cleaning the probe were positive in only 21 cases (42%) for aerobic and in 12 cases (24%) for anaerobic bacteria. The most common bacteria isolated in the aerobic cultures were Streptococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, and in the anaerobic cultures were Peptococcus spp. and Peptostreptococcus spp. All cultures taken from the coupling gel were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic probes may act as a medium for bacterial contamination and transmission. Cleaning of the probe with a dry, nonsterile paper towel is an easy, effective, low-cost, and device-friendly method that can reduce this risk.
PURPOSE: Hospital-acquired infections is a major concern affecting patient management, in which medical instruments and devices play an important role. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of bacterial contamination of the sonographic probe and describe an effective, safe, and practical decontamination method. METHODS: The study's sample consisted of 50 patients. Cultures were taken from the probe surface both after each examination and after the probes had been wiped clean with a dry, nonsterile paper towel. Cultures were also taken randomly from the coupling gel. RESULTS: Initial cultures were positive in 49 cases (98%) for aerobic and in 26 cases (52%) for anaerobic bacteria. Cultures obtained after cleaning the probe were positive in only 21 cases (42%) for aerobic and in 12 cases (24%) for anaerobic bacteria. The most common bacteria isolated in the aerobic cultures were Streptococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, and in the anaerobic cultures were Peptococcus spp. and Peptostreptococcus spp. All cultures taken from the coupling gel were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic probes may act as a medium for bacterial contamination and transmission. Cleaning of the probe with a dry, nonsterile paper towel is an easy, effective, low-cost, and device-friendly method that can reduce this risk.
Authors: Thomas Sartoretti; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Candid Bucher; Aleksis Doert; Christoph Binkert; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Johannes Froehlich; Orpheus Kolokythas; Simon Matoori; Christina Orasch; Sebastian Kos; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; Andreas Gutzeit Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Rogier Schroeder; Keetje de Mooij; Luitzen Groen; Pieter Dik; Caroline Kuijper; Aart Klijn; Tom de Jong Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Christiane M Nyhsen; Hilary Humphreys; Roland J Koerner; Nicolas Grenier; Adrian Brady; Paul Sidhu; Carlos Nicolau; Gerhard Mostbeck; Mirko D'Onofrio; Afshin Gangi; Michel Claudon Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2017-11-27