Literature DB >> 24615590

Research with bereaved families: a framework for ethical decision-making.

Magi Sque1, Wendy Walker2, Tracy Long-Sutehall3.   

Abstract

Theoretical debates about the nature of grief and bereavement draw attention to the sensitivity of carrying out research with bereaved people, the possible threats that this may pose and the ethical considerations required to ameliorate potentially damaging outcomes. The authors of this article present a framework for ethical decision-making that has been successfully developed in the context of research with bereaved families. The discussion focuses on application and evaluation of the framework during research with family members who were approached about the donation of a deceased relative's organs and/or tissues for transplantation. Practical strategies of relevance to the processes of participant recruitment, the interview encounter and follow-up care in the post-interview period are identified and discussed. Concerns about the possible impact of bereavement research are balanced with the views of family members who gave credence to the therapeutic and cathartic benefits of participating in sensitive, death-related research.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bereavement; decision-making; ethical considerations; organ donation; research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615590     DOI: 10.1177/0969733014521097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  6 in total

1.  Bereavement in critical care: A narrative review and practice exploration of current provision of support services and future challenges.

Authors:  Natalie A Pattison; Catherine White; Nazir I Lone
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2020-06-08

2.  Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol.

Authors:  Jacob Crawshaw; Justin Presseau; Zack van Allen; Livia Pinheiro Carvalho; Kim Jordison; Shane English; Dean A Fergusson; Francois Lauzier; Alexis F Turgeon; Aimee J Sarti; Claudio Martin; Frédérick D'Aragon; Alvin Ho-Ting Li; Greg Knoll; Ian Ball; Jamie Brehaut; Karen E A Burns; Marie-Chantal Fortin; Matthew Weiss; Maureen Meade; Pierre Marsolais; Sam Shemie; Sanabelle Zaabat; Sonny Dhanani; Simon C Kitto; Michaël Chassé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Let It Out (LIO) study: protocol for a mixed-methods study to optimise the design and assess the feasibility of an online emotional disclosure-based intervention in UK hospices.

Authors:  Daisy McInnerney; Bridget Candy; Patrick Stone; Nuriye Kupeli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol.

Authors:  Jane Noyes; Karen Morgan; Phillip Walton; Abigail Roberts; Leah Mclaughlin; Michael Stephens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Understanding the consumption of folic acid during preconception, among Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British mothers in Luton, UK: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rebecca Garcia; Nasreen Ali; Malcolm Griffiths; Gurch Randhawa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Designing a co-productive study to overcome known methodological challenges in organ donation research with bereaved family members.

Authors:  Jane Noyes; Leah Mclaughlin; Karen Morgan; Abigail Roberts; Michael Stephens; Janette Bourne; Michael Houlston; Jessica Houlston; Sarah Thomas; Revd Gethin Rhys; Bethan Moss; Sue Duncalf; Dawn Lee; Rebecca Curtis; Susanna Madden; Phillip Walton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.