Literature DB >> 24615422

The open latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic bankart repair.

Charles Bessière1, Christophe Trojani, Michel Carles, Saurabh S Mehta, Pascal Boileau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet bone block procedure are widely considered mainstays for surgical treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The choice between these procedures depends mainly on surgeon preference or training rather than published evidence. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared patients with recurrent posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart or open Latarjet procedure in terms of (1) frequency and timing of recurrent instability, (2) risk factors for recurrent instability, and (3) patient-reported outcomes.
METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, we paired 93 patients undergoing open Latarjet procedures with 93 patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repairs over the same period for posttraumatic anterior shoulder instability by one of four surgeons at the same center. Both groups were comparable except that patients in the Latarjet group had more glenoid lesions and more instability episodes preoperatively. Minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 6 years; range, 4-10 years). Patients were assessed with a questionnaire, including stability, Rowe score, and return to sports. Recurrent instability was defined as at least one episode of recurrent dislocation or subluxation. Return to sports was evaluated using a 0% to 100% scale that patients completed after recovery from surgery. Various risk factors for recurrent instability were also analyzed.
RESULTS: At latest followup, 10% (nine of 93) in the Latarjet group and 22% (20 of 93) in the Bankart group demonstrated recurrent instability (p = 0.026; odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.91). Ten recurrences in the Bankart group (50%) occurred after 2 years, compared to only one (11%) in the Latarjet group. Reoperation rate was 6% and 7% in the Bankart and Latarjet groups, respectively. In both groups, patients younger than 20 years had higher recurrence risk (p = 0.019). In the Bankart group, independent factors predictive for recurrence were practice of competitive sports and shoulder hyperlaxity (ie, passive external rotation > 85° in the contralateral uninjured shoulder). Although return to sports was not different between groups, the mean Rowe score was higher in the Latarjet group (78 versus 68, p = 0.018).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had the open Latarjet procedure had less recurrent instability and better Rowe scores over a mean 6-year followup. We now perform isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair for carefully selected patients, including patients with an Instability Severity Index Score of 3 or less. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615422      PMCID: PMC4079884          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  33 in total

1.  [Results of anterior coracoid abutments performed in 1995: apropos of 89 cases].

Authors:  D Gazielly
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-09

2.  The TOTS (temporary outside traction suture): a new technique to allow easy suture placement and improve capsular shift in arthroscopic bankart repair.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Philip Ahrens
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  [Coracoid process abutment according to Latarjet versus the Bankart operation. A comparative study of the results in 50 cases].

Authors:  C Vander Maren; B Geulette; J Lewalle; J Mullier; J C Autrique; J Thiery; J Deneufbourg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  Don't forget the Bristow-Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  J K Weaver; R S Derkash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.

Authors:  C R Rowe; D Patel; W W Southmayd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Joe F Debeer; Armin M Tehrany; Peter M Parten
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Two- to five-year followup of arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction using a suture anchor technique.

Authors:  S Koss; J C Richmond; J S Woodward
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Quantitative assessment of classic anteroinferior bony Bankart lesions by radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Eiji Itoi; Seok-Beom Lee; Kimberly K Amrami; Doris E Wenger; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sugaya; Joji Moriishi; Michiko Dohi; Yoshiaki Kon; Akihiro Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  [Clinical and computed tomography results of 106 Latarjet-Patte procedures at mean 7.5 year follow-up].

Authors:  X Cassagnaud; C Maynou; H Mestdagh
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2003-12
View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  Open Latarjet versus arthroscopic Latarjet: clinical results and cost analysis.

Authors:  P Randelli; C Fossati; C Stoppani; F R Evola; L De Girolamo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical comparison of the Latarjet procedure with and without a coracoid bone block.

Authors:  W Barrett Payne; Matthew T Kleiner; Michelle H McGarry; James E Tibone; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopic Bone Grafting for Anteroinferior Glenoid Defect Using Template.

Authors:  Wichan Kanchanatawan; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul; Kaiwan Sriruanthong; Gem Dorjiee
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-31

4.  The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: effective and safe.

Authors:  Zhenming He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

Review 5.  Low rate of recurrent instability following the open Latarjet procedure as a revision procedure for failed prior stabilization surgery.

Authors:  Zakariya S Ali; Eoghan T Hurley; M Shazil Jamal; Marilee P Horan; Connor Montgomery; Leo Pauzenberger; Peter J Millett; Hannan Mullett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability in professional athletes.

Authors:  Andrea Pantalone; Daniele Vanni; Matteo Guelfi; Michele Di Mauro; Michele Abate; Vincenzo Salini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-12

7.  Latarjet procedure using subscapularis split approach offers better rotational endurance than partial tenotomy for anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Fevzi Birisik; Hakan Ozben; Ata Can Atalar; Turker Sahinkaya; Aksel Seyahi; Mehmet Demirhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Recurrent shoulder stabilization with open bankart repair and long head biceps transfer.

Authors:  Steven F DeFroda; Joseph A Gil; Brett D Owens
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-19

9.  [The mini-open Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder].

Authors:  J Pogorzelski; K Beitzel; A B Imhoff; S Braun
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Novel and effective arthroscopic extracapsular stabilization technique for anterior shoulder instability-BLS.

Authors:  Roman Brzóska; Hubert Laprus; Piotr Michniowski; Wojciech Solecki; Wojciech Klon; Adrian Błasiak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.