| Literature DB >> 24615341 |
Songjun Guo1, Xiaolang He, Mei Chen, Jihua Tan, Yinghui Wang.
Abstract
For the first time, ambient carbonyls were measured in a rural area in southern China from August 2012 to February 2013 to investigate their distribution characteristics and sources. Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were the three most abundant carbonyls, which accounted for 83-95 % of total seven carbonyls identified. The O3 formation potential of carbonyls in summer (59.55 μg/m(3)) was approximately ten times greater than that (6.37 μg/m(3)) in winter, and calculated photolysis rates were significantly faster in summer than those in winter, suggesting intensive photochemical activities in summer. Seasonal and diurnal variations of carbonyls showed that (1) the concentration of total carbonyls in summer (12.62 ± 10.83 μg/m(3)) was approximately five times greater than that in winter (2.33 ± 0.90 μg/m(3)), and a similar trend applied to the three abundant carbonyls; (2) the average summer to winter (S/W) ratio of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde was 10-13, and the S/W ratio of acetone was ~2.59; and (3) the highest concentrations of the three carbonyls and total carbonyls occurred at 14:00-16:00 with high temperature and intensive sunlight, especially in summer. These variations provided direct evidence for significant photochemical production of ambient carbonyls. Average C1/C2 ratios (3.07 ± 1.62) in summer were much greater than those (1.28 ± 0.25) in winter, and average C2/C3 ratios (35.09 ± 58.67) in summer were significantly greater than those (4.75 ± 2.12) in winter, both cases indirectly implying positive photochemical productions in summer. Especially, strong correlations (R(2) = 0.63-0.98) of temperature and sunlight intensity with the three abundant carbonyls and total carbonyls were observed, indicating a similar causal source such as significant photochemical production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24615341 DOI: 10.1007/s00244-014-0013-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol ISSN: 0090-4341 Impact factor: 2.804