Jochanan Benbassat1. 1. Smokler Center for Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, PO Box 3886, 91037, Jerusalem, Israel, benbasat@jdc.org.il.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Educators are concerned by the high prevalence of emotional distress among medical students, and by the alleged decline in their humanitarian values. OBJECTIVE: To re-examine these concerns by reviewing studies of medical students' wellbeing and development. METHOD: Narrative review of the literature. MAIN FINDINGS: (a) Medical students' emotional distress increases during their undergraduate training. However, although higher than in the general population, the prevalence of distress among medical students is similar to that among other university students. (b) Medical students' distress is independently related to endogenous factors (personality traits and life events) and to their perception of the medical learning environment. (c) Medical students do not display a measurable increase in moral reasoning, empathy and tolerance of uncertainty. (d) Students' wellbeing, moral development, reflectivity and tolerance of uncertainty have been shown to be interrelated, and associated with clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review endorse the concerns about the wellbeing and development of undergraduate medical students. The design of the reviewed studies does not permit inferences about causality. Yet, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that medical training causes emotional distress that delays students' development and affects their clinical performance.
BACKGROUND: Educators are concerned by the high prevalence of emotional distress among medical students, and by the alleged decline in their humanitarian values. OBJECTIVE: To re-examine these concerns by reviewing studies of medical students' wellbeing and development. METHOD: Narrative review of the literature. MAIN FINDINGS: (a) Medical students' emotional distress increases during their undergraduate training. However, although higher than in the general population, the prevalence of distress among medical students is similar to that among other university students. (b) Medical students' distress is independently related to endogenous factors (personality traits and life events) and to their perception of the medical learning environment. (c) Medical students do not display a measurable increase in moral reasoning, empathy and tolerance of uncertainty. (d) Students' wellbeing, moral development, reflectivity and tolerance of uncertainty have been shown to be interrelated, and associated with clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review endorse the concerns about the wellbeing and development of undergraduate medical students. The design of the reviewed studies does not permit inferences about causality. Yet, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that medical training causes emotional distress that delays students' development and affects their clinical performance.