BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin may be more effective for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia than either treatment alone. We report the results of three pharmacokinetics and tolerability studies, which used a dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl (0.5 mg/0.2 mg) fixed-dose combination (FDC) capsules containing a small dutasteride soft gelatin capsule (smaller than commercial Avodart™) and modified-release tamsulosin pellets that have different amounts of enteric coating. These studies compared the test products to commercial Avodart™ (dutasteride 0.5 mg) and two different commercial tamsulosin HCl 0.2 mg products, Harnal™ Capsules or Harnal-D™ Tablets, which are reportedly bioequivalent to each other. METHODS: All three studies were randomized single-dose studies in healthy male adults. Study 1 [N = 86 (NCT01254071)] was a two-period crossover study of a dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC versus coadministered Avodart™ and Harnal-D™ Tablets. The pharmacokinetics of both dutasteride and tamsulosin were studied. Study 2 [N = 27 (NCT01471678)] was a four-period crossover study of dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC formulations versus Avodart™ and Harnal™ Capsules or Harnal-D™ Tablets. Only the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin were studied. Study 3 [N = 40 (NCT01495026)] was a two-period study of dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC formulations versus coadministered Avodart™ and Harnal-D™ Tablets. In this study, only the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin were studied. Study 2 assessed fed-state pharmacokinetics. Studies 1 and 3 assessed fed- and fasted-state pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: All dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC formulations and coadministered treatments were well-tolerated. In Study 1, the FDC dutasteride was bioequivalent to Avodart™ coadministered with tamsulosin under fed and fasted conditions. In Study 1, the FDC tamsulosin had a slower release than commercial Harnal-D™ Tablets coadministered with dutasteride (fed and fasted state). In Study 2, the FDC tamsulosin containing 15 % by weight enteric-coated tamsulosin pellets was bioequivalent to Harnal™ Capsules coadministered with dutasteride in the fed state. In Study 3, the FDC containing 15 % by weight enteric-coated tamsulosin pellets combined with uncoated tamsulosin pellets (coated:uncoated = 10:90) were bioequivalent to Harnal-D™ Tablets coadministered with dutasteride in the fasted state but not the fed state. CONCLUSIONS: The FDC formulations were well-tolerated and some FDC formulations were comparable with concomitant administration of commercially available dutasteride and tamsulosin.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin may be more effective for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia than either treatment alone. We report the results of three pharmacokinetics and tolerability studies, which used a dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl (0.5 mg/0.2 mg) fixed-dose combination (FDC) capsules containing a small dutasteride soft gelatin capsule (smaller than commercial Avodart™) and modified-release tamsulosin pellets that have different amounts of enteric coating. These studies compared the test products to commercial Avodart™ (dutasteride 0.5 mg) and two different commercial tamsulosin HCl 0.2 mg products, Harnal™ Capsules or Harnal-D™ Tablets, which are reportedly bioequivalent to each other. METHODS: All three studies were randomized single-dose studies in healthy male adults. Study 1 [N = 86 (NCT01254071)] was a two-period crossover study of a dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC versus coadministered Avodart™ and Harnal-D™ Tablets. The pharmacokinetics of both dutasteride and tamsulosin were studied. Study 2 [N = 27 (NCT01471678)] was a four-period crossover study of dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC formulations versus Avodart™ and Harnal™ Capsules or Harnal-D™ Tablets. Only the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin were studied. Study 3 [N = 40 (NCT01495026)] was a two-period study of dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC formulations versus coadministered Avodart™ and Harnal-D™ Tablets. In this study, only the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin were studied. Study 2 assessed fed-state pharmacokinetics. Studies 1 and 3 assessed fed- and fasted-state pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: All dutasteride/tamsulosin HCl FDC formulations and coadministered treatments were well-tolerated. In Study 1, the FDCdutasteride was bioequivalent to Avodart™ coadministered with tamsulosin under fed and fasted conditions. In Study 1, the FDCtamsulosin had a slower release than commercial Harnal-D™ Tablets coadministered with dutasteride (fed and fasted state). In Study 2, the FDCtamsulosin containing 15 % by weight enteric-coated tamsulosin pellets was bioequivalent to Harnal™ Capsules coadministered with dutasteride in the fed state. In Study 3, the FDC containing 15 % by weight enteric-coated tamsulosin pellets combined with uncoated tamsulosin pellets (coated:uncoated = 10:90) were bioequivalent to Harnal-D™ Tablets coadministered with dutasteride in the fasted state but not the fed state. CONCLUSIONS: The FDC formulations were well-tolerated and some FDC formulations were comparable with concomitant administration of commercially available dutasteride and tamsulosin.
Authors: Claus G Roehrborn; Paul Siami; Jack Barkin; Ronaldo Damião; Kim Major-Walker; Indrani Nandy; Betsy B Morrill; R Paul Gagnier; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-09-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Claus G Roehrborn; Paul Siami; Jack Barkin; Ronaldo Damião; Kim Major-Walker; Betsy Morrill; Francesco Montorsi Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sandra van Dulmen; Emmy Sluijs; Liset van Dijk; Denise de Ridder; Rob Heerdink; Jozien Bensing Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 2.655