Literature DB >> 24615066

Complications of titanium cranioplasty--a retrospective analysis of 174 patients.

Soumya Mukherjee1, Bhaskar Thakur, Imran Haq, Samantha Hettige, Andrew J Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Titanium cranioplasty (TC) has been associated with high complication rates, but abundant data are lacking. We aimed to determine the incidence and type of complications following TC and risk factors for complications.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 174 patients who underwent TC at two London units over a seven year period. Data were collected on demographics, primary pathology, perioperative details, complications and functional outcome. Skull defect size was estimated using 3-dimensional computed tomographic reconstructions.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 26.4 % (46/174), and plate removal rate10.3 % (18/174). The commonest complication was infection, which accounted for 69 % of plate removals. Patients who had undergone craniectomy for trauma had a higher complication rate (35 vs 21 %; p = 0.043) and plate removal rate (16 vs 7 %; p = 0.049) than others. There was a non-significant trend towards the association of craniectomy-to-cranioplasty interval of 4-8 months with the lowest complication rate and shortest postoperative hospital stay. Patients with a skull defect larger than 100 cm(2) had the highest complication rate (p < 0.001), highest plate removal rate (p = 0.039), and longest postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.019). Bifrontal versus unilateral cranioplasty was associated with a significantly higher complication rate (40 vs 14 %) and length of hospital stay (5.0 vs 2.9 days). There was no perioperative mortality and no change between pre-operative and post-operative functional outcome.
CONCLUSION: In the largest UK study on cranioplasty to date, we have demonstrated that size of defect, traumatic aetiology and bifrontal insertion are risk factors for complications. Our results suggest that the timing of cranioplasty may be important with late (> 12 months) TC associated with a higher rate of complications, although further prospective studies on the optimal timing of TC are required to establish the observed trend. Our data can help clinicians stratify risk to inform the consent process and aid pre-operative planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615066     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-014-2024-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  16 in total

1.  Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Henry; Michael Amoo; Adam Murphy; David P O'Brien
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Bioinspired Collagen Scaffolds in Cranial Bone Regeneration: From Bedside to Bench.

Authors:  Justine C Lee; Elizabeth J Volpicelli
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Reconstruction of Acquired Frontal Bone Defects Using Titanium Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-01-22

4.  Preparation of Porous Chitosan-Siloxane Hybrids Coated with Hydroxyapatite Particles.

Authors:  Yuki Shirosaki; Kohei Okamoto; Satoshi Hayakawa; Akiyoshi Osaka; Takuji Asano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Fatal cerebral swelling immediately after cranioplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Yuta Kaneshiro; Keiji Murata; Shigeru Yamauchi; Yumiko Urano
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-07-25

6.  Exposure of Titanium Mesh after Cranioplasty for Microvascular Decompression Surgery: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  Saiko Watanabe; Kenichi Amagasaki; Kazuaki Naemura; Hiroshi Nakaguchi
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 7.  Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement.

Authors:  Peter J Hutchinson; Angelos G Kolias; Tamara Tajsic; Amos Adeleye; Abenezer Tirsit Aklilu; Tedy Apriawan; Abdul Hafid Bajamal; Ernest J Barthélemy; B Indira Devi; Dhananjaya Bhat; Diederik Bulters; Randall Chesnut; Giuseppe Citerio; D Jamie Cooper; Marek Czosnyka; Idara Edem; Nasser M F El-Ghandour; Anthony Figaji; Kostas N Fountas; Clare Gallagher; Gregory W J Hawryluk; Corrado Iaccarino; Mathew Joseph; Tariq Khan; Tsegazeab Laeke; Oleg Levchenko; Baiyun Liu; Weiming Liu; Andrew Maas; Geoffrey T Manley; Paul Manson; Anna T Mazzeo; David K Menon; Daniel B Michael; Susanne Muehlschlegel; David O Okonkwo; Kee B Park; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Gail Rosseau; Andres M Rubiano; Hamisi K Shabani; Nino Stocchetti; Shelly D Timmons; Ivan Timofeev; Chris Uff; Jamie S Ullman; Alex Valadka; Vicknes Waran; Adam Wells; Mark H Wilson; Franco Servadei
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Japanese National Questionnaire Survey in 2018 on Complications Related to Cranial Implants in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Takao Yasuhara; Satoshi Murai; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Susumu Miyamoto; Isao Date
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Determinants of 30-day Morbidity in Adult Cranioplasty: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis of 697 Cases.

Authors:  Rachel E Armstrong; Marco F Ellis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 10.  Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Corrado Iaccarino; Angelos G Kolias; Louis-Georges Roumy; Kostas Fountas; Amos Olufemi Adeleye
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.