Literature DB >> 24615006

The reconstructed tree in the lineage-based model of protracted speciation.

Amaury Lambert1, Hélène Morlon, Rampal S Etienne.   

Abstract

A popular line of research in evolutionary biology is the use of time-calibrated phylogenies for the inference of diversification processes. This requires computing the likelihood of a given ultrametric tree as the reconstructed tree produced by a given model of diversification. Etienne and Rosindell in Syst Biol 61(2):204-213, (2012) proposed a lineage-based model of diversification, called protracted speciation, where species remain incipient during a random duration before turning good species, and showed that this can explain the slowdown in lineage accumulation observed in real phylogenies. However, they were unable to provide a general likelihood formula. Here, we present a likelihood formula for protracted speciation models, where rates at which species turn good or become extinct can depend both on their age and on time. Our only restrictive assumption is that speciation rate does not depend on species status. Our likelihood formula utilizes a new technique, based on the contour of the phylogenetic tree and first developed by Lambert in Ann Probab 38(1):348-395, (2010). We consider the reconstructed trees spanned by all extant species, by all good extant species, or by all representative species, which are either good extant species or incipient species representative of some good extinct species. Specifically, we prove that each of these trees is a coalescent point process, that is, a planar, ultrametric tree where the coalescence times between two consecutive tips are independent, identically distributed random variables. We characterize the common distribution of these coalescence times in some, biologically meaningful, special cases for which the likelihood reduces to an elegant analytical formula or becomes numerically tractable.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615006     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-014-0767-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  22 in total

1.  Reconciling molecular phylogenies with the fossil record.

Authors:  Hélène Morlon; Todd L Parsons; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The shape and temporal dynamics of phylogenetic trees arising from geographic speciation.

Authors:  Alex L Pigot; Albert B Phillimore; Ian P F Owens; C David L Orme
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 3.  Estimating diversification rates from phylogenetic information.

Authors:  Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The ecological dynamics of clade diversification and community assembly.

Authors:  Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  Phylogenetic estimates of speciation and extinction rates for testing ecological and evolutionary hypotheses.

Authors:  R Alexander Pyron; Frank T Burbrink
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  A conceptual and statistical framework for adaptive radiations with a key role for diversity dependence.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; Bart Haegeman
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Why does diversification slow down?

Authors:  Daniel Moen; Hélène Morlon
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts.

Authors:  Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The reconstructed evolutionary process.

Authors:  S Nee; R M May; P H Harvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-05-28       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; James Rosindell
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  7 in total

1.  Multispecies coalescent delimits structure, not species.

Authors:  Jeet Sukumaran; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protracted Speciation under the State-Dependent Speciation and Extinction Approach.

Authors:  Xia Hua; Tyara Herdha; Conrad J Burden
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.160

3.  Estimating the duration of speciation from phylogenies.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; Hélène Morlon; Amaury Lambert
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Microevolutionary processes impact macroevolutionary patterns.

Authors:  Jingchun Li; Jen-Pen Huang; Jeet Sukumaran; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Additional Analytical Support for a New Method to Compute the Likelihood of Diversification Models.

Authors:  Giovanni Laudanno; Bart Haegeman; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation.

Authors:  Jeet Sukumaran; Mark T Holder; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Effects of memory on the shapes of simple outbreak trees.

Authors:  Giacomo Plazzotta; Christopher Kwan; Michael Boyd; Caroline Colijn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.