Liyong Zhang1, Xin Chen1, Parveen Sharma2, Mark Moon1, Alex D Sheftel3, Fayez Dawood1, Mai P Nghiem2, Jun Wu2, Ren-Ke Li2, Anthony O Gramolini4, Poul H Sorensen5, Josef M Penninger6, John H Brumell7, Peter P Liu8. 1. 1] University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7 [2] Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellent for Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto and Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. 2. Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellent for Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto and Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. 3. University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7. 4. 1] Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellent for Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto and Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4 [2] Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8. 5. Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1L3. 6. Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dr Bohrgasse 3, A-1030 Vienna, Austria. 7. 1] Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8 [2] Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8 [3] Cell Biology Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1 × 8. 8. 1] University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7 [2] Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellent for Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto and Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4 [3] Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8 [4] Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8.
Abstract
The HECT E3 ubiquitin ligase HACE1 is a tumour suppressor known to regulate Rac1 activity under stress conditions. HACE1 is increased in the serum of patients with heart failure. Here we show that HACE1 protects the heart under pressure stress by controlling protein degradation. Hace1 deficiency in mice results in accelerated heart failure and increased mortality under haemodynamic stress. Hearts from Hace1(-/-) mice display abnormal cardiac hypertrophy, left ventricular dysfunction, accumulation of LC3, p62 and ubiquitinated proteins enriched for cytoskeletal species, indicating impaired autophagy. Our data suggest that HACE1 mediates p62-dependent selective autophagic turnover of ubiquitinated proteins by its ankyrin repeat domain through protein-protein interaction, which is independent of its E3 ligase activity. This would classify HACE1 as a dual-function E3 ligase. Our finding that HACE1 has a protective function in the heart in response to haemodynamic stress suggests that HACE1 may be a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for heart disease.
The HECT E3 ubiquitin ligaseHACE1 is a tumour suppressor known to regulate Rac1 activity under stress conditions. HACE1 is increased in the serum of patients with heart failure. Here we show that HACE1 protects the heart under pressure stress by controlling protein degradation. Hace1 deficiency in mice results in accelerated heart failure and increased mortality under haemodynamic stress. Hearts from Hace1(-/-) mice display abnormal cardiac hypertrophy, left ventricular dysfunction, accumulation of LC3, p62 and ubiquitinated proteins enriched for cytoskeletal species, indicating impaired autophagy. Our data suggest that HACE1 mediates p62-dependent selective autophagic turnover of ubiquitinated proteins by its ankyrin repeat domain through protein-protein interaction, which is independent of its E3 ligase activity. This would classify HACE1 as a dual-function E3 ligase. Our finding that HACE1 has a protective function in the heart in response to haemodynamic stress suggests that HACE1 may be a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for heart disease.
Heart disease is a major cause of death in the developed world, and protection against
heart failure is a major challenge1. Animal models have shown that
inappropriate responses of the heart to sustained haemodynamic stress can lead to heart
failure234. Protein degradation pathways, including the
proteasome and autophagy, play a protective role in the response to stress, and their
dysregulation appears to underline multiple forms of myocardial disease5678910. In post-mitotic cells such as cardiomyocytes,
turnover of proteins and organelles is particularly important for cellular protein
quality control and maintenance. Two major pathways within the cell that regulate
proteolysis are the ubiquitin (Ub)–proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagy
lysosomal pathway6. Whereas the UPS is mainly involved in the rapid
degradation of signalling proteins with short half-lives, autophagy can selectively
remove more persistent protein aggregates and damaged organelles5.
Both proteasome-mediated degradation and selective autophagy require ubiquitination of
the cargo, which is then recognized by Ub receptors directing it to either 26S
proteasomes or lysosome for degradation6. HACE1, as a novel stress inducible Ub E3 protein
ligase, has potential roles in both proteolytic systems. We and others previously
reported that HACE1 is involved in
proteasome-mediated protein degradation11121314151617.
However, HACE1’s
involvement in autophagy-mediated protein degradation has never been explored.Increases in autophagic flux have been documented in virtually all forms of humancardiovascular disease, including ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure1819. This is indicative of a requirement for autophagy in the
maintenance of cellular homoeostasis during ventricular hypertrophic remodelling.
Although HACE1 is highly expressed in
the heart, nothing is known about its function in the heart. The emerging role of other
E3 ligase and Ub-binding proteins in selective autophagy suggests that HACE1 may also participate in this process.Here we demonstrate for the first time that HACE1 is essential for the completion of selective autophagic flux.
Hace1 deficiency
results in increased accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in stressed
myocardium due to impaired autophagy and thus accelerates cardiac dysfunction.
Results
HACE1 is upregulated in
human heart failure
To clarify the role of HACE1 in
the development of heart failure, we performed in silico GEO
profiles’ analysis of HACE1 gene expression related to human heart
disease. Our search indicated that HACE1 gene expression is upregulated in dilated
cardiomyopathy (DCM) compared with non-failing hearts (GEO accession code
GDS2206). To confirm this, we examined HACE1 messenger RNA expression in a panel of heart
tissue biopsies from heart failurepatients as well as non-failing heart
controls. Significantly, increased HACE1 gene expression was detected in cardiac
tissues of heart failurepatients compared with non-failing hearts; there was a
2.5-fold increase in HACE1 gene expression in ischaemic cardiomyopathy and
more than a 3-fold increase in DCM (Fig. 1a). In addition,
markedly elevated Hace1
gene expression was detected in a murine model of heart failure induced by
severe transverse aortic constriction (sTAC) compared with a sham-operated
control group at 4 days post operation (unpaired two-tailed Student’s
t-test, P=0.0004; Fig. 1b). The robust
induction of HACE1
expression in the heart under pathological stress conditions suggests that
HACE1 participates in
stress-induced cardiac hypertrophic remodelling.
(a) HACE1
mRNA expression is markedly increased in ischaemic and dilated
cardiomyopathy (ICM and DCM) heart failure (HF) patient heart tissue
compared with non-failing hearts (NF). Expression levels were normalized to
HPRT and
GAPDH mRNAs. n=15 per group. Control, non-failing heart.
(b) Elevated Hace1 mRNA expression in sTAC mouse hearts
compared with sham controls, expression levels were normalized to
Hprt and
Gapdh mRNAs. n=6–9 per group, P=0.004
(unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests).
(c–j) Hace1
and WT mice were subjected to sTAC or sham surgery and analysed 4 days after
the operation. (c–e) Echocardiographic measurement
of (c) LV fractional shortening (FS=(LVEDD−LVESD)/LVEDD
× 100%); (d) LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (mm) and
(e) LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) (mm) are shown.
n=6–8 for each group. (f) Mortality rate of WT and
Hace1
mice after sTAC is shown by Kaplan–Meier plots as the survival
proportion of each cohort of mice. Survival incidence in mice over the
indicated follow-up period is shown as the ratio of the number of mice
survived/total mice analysed for each group. This represents 60% (12/20) for
Hace1
sTAC mice, 84% (16/19) for Hace1 sTAC mice and
100% (12/12) for both Hace1
and Hace1 sham mice on day
4; P value as indicated (log-rank
χ2-test). (g) Heart weight/body
weight ratios (HW/BW) and (h) lung weight/body weight ratio (LW/BW)
of WT and Hace1
mice 4 days after sTAC or sham surgery. n=15–21 for each
group. (i) Representative haematoxylin and eosin staining transverse
heart cross-sections showing myocyte cross-sectional area (scale bars,
20 μm). (j) Real-time RT–PCR analyses
reveal a significant increase in the expression of the atrial natriuretic
peptide gene (Nppa), a clinical biomarker for heart hypertrophy, in
Hace1
sTAC heart; expression levels were normalized to Hprt and Gapdh
mRNAs. n=6–9 per group. In all panels, error bars
represent s.e.m., one-way analysis of variance were used to calculate
P-values.
Loss of Hace1
accelerates load-induced heart failure in mice
Surgical models of cardiac pressure overload in mice have provided a platform for
studying load-induced heart failure. To investigate Hace1’s role in the
progression of heart failure, we subjected Hace1
and Hace1mice to hypertrophic
heart failure induced by sTAC20. Sham-operated mice were
used as controls. Starting from the second day after surgery, noticeable signs
of circulatory failure, including lethargy, impaired mobility, diminished
appetite and peripheral oedema were observed in mice subjected to sTAC.
Echocardiographic measurements revealed no cardiac physiological functional
differences between Hace1,
Hace1 or sham-operated mice
at baseline (Fig. 1c–e). However, pressure
overload induced by sTAC triggers dramatic decreases in left ventricular (LV)
function as measured by echocardiography at days 2 and 4 post operation (Fig. 1c–e). More importantly, these signs of LV
dysfunction were more notable in the Hace1sTAC-treated mice as shown by a significantly decreased percentage of LV
fractional shortening and severely dilated LV, which was indicated by a
significant increase in both LV end-diastolic dimension and LV end-systolic
dimension compared with wild-type (WT) mice with the same treatment (Fig. 1c–e). Moreover, The LV dysfunction resulted
in significantly higher mortality rates in Hace1mice following sTAC; 40% (8/20) of Hace1mice died between day 1 and day 4 post sTAC, compared with only 16% (3/19) of
the Hace1mice (log-rank
χ2-test, P<0.001; Fig. 1f). This was accompanied by a significant increase in
cardiac mass as measured by growing heart weight/body weight ratio in
Hace1sTACmice compared with Hace1sTACmice (Fig. 1g). An increase in myocyte cross-sectional area, as
revealed by haematoxylin and eosin staining of left ventricle cross-sections,
confirmed that the increase in heart weight/body weight ratio in
Hace1sTACmice was caused by myocyte enlargement (Fig. 1i).
Consistent with severe heart failure, Hace1sTACmice also had a significantly higher lung weight/body weight ratio,
accompanied by pulmonary oedema, compared with Hace1sTACmice (Fig. 1h). Expression of atrial natriuretic peptide precursor A,
a biomarker of cardiac stress and hypertrophy212223,
was also elevated in Hace1sTAC hearts (Fig. 1j). In addition, in our initial pilot
studies of HACE1 protein level
changes in human clinical plasma samples with heart failure, we also observed
some degree of correlation between HACE1 and B-type
natriuretic peptide (Supplementary Fig. 1). However, the data only explain 19.5% of the
relationship (as per R2 value), and thus HACE1 and B-type natriuretic peptide do ultimately
reflect different biological processes. These findings indicate that, in the
absence of Hace1, haemodynamic
stress induced by sTAC triggers rapid decompensated cardiac hypertrophic
remodelling, progressing to heart failure and increased mortality in these
mice.
Accumulation of protein aggregates in Hace1−/− sTAC
myocardium
To explore Hace1’s
role in controlling cardiac remodelling at the cellular level, LV sections of
sTACmice were subjected to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination.
Ultrastructural analysis of Hace1sTAC hearts showed a disorganized sarcomere structure and significantly more
structures resembling autophagic vacuoles (Supplementary Fig. 2a). It is noteworthy that
these cellular phenotypes are similar to those previously observed in
Atg5-deficient hearts,
which are defective in protein/organelle turnover via autophagy5. We also observed fewer high-density autolysosome structures in
Hace1sTAC hearts when compared with Hace1+/+ sTAC hearts (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b). In contrast, we
observed enlarged autophagosome-like vacuole structures, in some cases
containing intact mitochondria, suggesting a disruption in the completion of the
autophagy pathway (Supplementary Fig.
2a). Ventricular sections from sham-treated Hace1+/+ and
Hace1mice appeared normal (Supplementary Fig.
2c,d). Thus, Hace1
deficiency results in extensive cellular defects in the myocardium during
haemodynamic stress.One of the impacts of impaired protein degradation pathways is the accumulation
of ubiquitinated proteins524. Immunohistochemical
staining of left ventricle cross-sections of sTACmice revealed a significantly
increased accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins in Hace1
myocardium (Fig. 2a). This was further confirmed by
western blot analysis (Fig. 2d,e). The Ub and
microtubule-associated protein 1 light
chain 3B (LC3II) binding protein p62 (also known as sequestosome 1), which is known to be degraded by autophagy,
also accumulates during impairment of autophagy24. We
observed by immunohistochemical analysis (Fig. 2b) and
western blot (Fig. 2d,f) increased levels of p62 protein in the Hace1sTAC heart tissue. This suggests that autophagic degradation of p62 was blocked in the absence of
Hace1,
resulting in the increased cellular accumulation of p62.
Figure 2
Accumulation of p62
LC3 and Ub+
protein in Hace1
sTAC hearts.
Representative immunohistochemical staining for (a) ubiquitinated
protein (brown); (b) p62 (brown) and (c) GFP-LC3 (brown) in paraffin sections of
heart revealing increased accumulation of p62, ubiquitinated protein and
LC3 in
Hace1
sTAC hearts. Hearts from three mice in each group were analysed (scale bars,
10 μm). Representative immunoblot and quantification
for (d,e) Ub-conjugated proteins, (d,f)
p62 and
(g,h) LC3 in heart extracts (n=3 per group), Gapdh were
used as a loading control. (i) Increased Ub proteasome activity in
Hace1
sTAC hearts as measured by 20S proteasome activity assay
(n=4–6 per group). In all panels, error bars represent
s.e.m., P value between KO and WT sTAC as indicated (one-way analysis
of variance).
Next, we assessed autophagy by examining microtubule-associated protein
LC3, an autophagy protein
that is present in the cytosol (LC3-I form) until it becomes targeted to nascent
autophagosomes via conjugation to phosphatidylethanoloamine (LC3-II form)25.
Levels of LC3 were first
examined by western blot (Fig. 2c,g). In Hace1sTAC hearts, we observed a significant increase in total LC3 protein levels. Both LC3-I and the LC3-II forms of the protein accumulated
to a significantly higher level in Hace1sTAC hearts when compared with Hace1+/+ controls. Enhanced
LC3 accumulation was also
observed in Hace1/LC3 sTAC
myocardium, which stably expresses green fluorescence protein
(GFP)-LC3 under the
β-actin (CAG)
promoter26 (Fig. 2h). Moreover,
no significant increase in p62 or Lc3b gene expression was detected in
Hace1sTAC heart (Supplementary Fig. 3),
suggesting that the increased p62 and LC3 accumulation were due to impaired degradation by
autophagy at the post-transcriptional level.It is possible that defects in proteasomal activity were responsible for the
ubiquitinated protein accumulation in sTACHace1
myocardium. However, heart lysates from sTAC-treated Hace1mice displayed elevated 20S proteasome levels compared with Hace1+/+ hearts
(Fig. 2i). This may reflect a compensating mechanism
to overcome the impairment of autophagy. Indeed, elevated cardiac proteasomal
activity accompanies autophagy deficiency on deletion of Atg5 (ref. 5).Thus, Hace1 deficiency impaired
the clearance of ubiquitinated proteins in the myocardium and is associated with
the acceleration of heart failure. In addition to its role in protein
degradation by the proteasome1112131415, our data
indicate that HACE1 is also
required for efficient functioning of the autophagy pathway in the heart during
haemodynamic stress.
HACE1 controls
autophagic clearance of protein aggregates
To better understand HACE1’s function in the clearance of ubiquitinated
proteins under stress conditions, we examined its role in protein aggregate
clearance in both primary neonatal cardiomyocytes (NCMs) and embryonic
fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Hace1
and Hace1+/+ control mice. Ubiquitinated
protein aggregate formation was induced by treatment with puromycin, an inhibitor of protein
translation that induces premature polypeptide chain termination and the
subsequent accumulation of misfolded proteins, which can be detected with a
monoclonal antibody specific to ubiquitinated proteins27.
Immunofluorescence staining shows HACE1 localized to ubiquitinated protein aggregates in
puromycin-treated MEF
(Fig. 3a). This suggests that HACE1 may act locally at the aggregates
to promote protein turnover. To test this hypothesis, we subjected WT and
Hace1
primary NCMs to an aggregate clearance assay2728, where
cells were pulsed with puromycin for 4 h to induce protein aggregate
formation. The treatment was then removed by extensive washing, followed by an
8-h chase to allow for aggregate clearance. The majority of WT NCM was able to
clear aggregates by 8 h after puromycin removal (Fig. 3b). In
contrast, aggregate clearance was almost completely blocked in Hace1
NCM.
Figure 3
HACE1 is required for
autophagic clearance of Ub+ protein aggregates independent of its
E3 ligase activity.
(a) Representative confocal microscopy images showing HACE1 (green) localizing to the
Ub+ protein aggregates (red) induced by puromycin treatment in
HA-HACE1 MEF. Arrows
indicate co-localized puncta. Scale bar, 10 μm.
(b) Representative confocal micrographs of Hace1−/− and
Hace1+/+ NCM treated with puromycin for 4 h
(puromycin),
puromycin followed by
8 h recover (puromycin+recover). Vehicle (PBS)-treated cells were
used as control. Hace1
deficiency in cardiomyocytes (Hace1−/− NCM)
blocks ubiquitinated protein aggregate degradation. Scale bars,
10 μm. (c,d) WT and Hace1−/− MEF as
well as Hace1−/− MEF stably
transfected with WT HACE1
and C876S-mutant HACE1were subjected to protein aggregates clearance assay by
pulsing with puromycin
for 4 h to induce protein aggregate formation followed by an 8-h
chase to monitor for aggregate clearance. Cells were fixed and stained for
ubiquitinated proteins to visualize aggregates. Vehicle (PBS)-treated MEFs
were used as control. (c) Representative confocal micrographs of
images used for quantification of the efficiency of aggregates clearance in
d (percentage of cells that cleared all aggregates by
8 h after puromycin removal). At least 10 images from each group
were used for the calculation, error bars represent s.e.m.,
P<0.001 (one-way analysis of variance). Scale bars,
10 μm.
To evaluate whether HACE1’s E3 ligase activity is required for the
clearance of protein aggregates, we next compared the effects of WT and mutant
HACE1 expression on
rescue of aggregate clearance. Hace1
MEF stably transfected with either WT HACE1 complementary DNA (WT-HACE1) or a C876S point mutated
form of HACE1 (C876S)
were used for the rescue studies. The point mutation of amino acid 876 from
cysteine to serine is known to abolish E3 ligase
activity of HACE1 (refs
11, 12, 13, 14, 15). As expected, the defects in aggregate clearance in
Hace1
MEF were rescued by WT HACE1.
Surprisingly, HACE1 (C876S)
rescued the protein aggregate clearance defect as efficiently as WT
HACE1 (Fig. 3c,d).
ANK domain in HACE1 is
required for removal of protein aggregates
To date, the only known HACE1
E3 ligase substrate is Rac1.
It has been shown that HACE1
controls Rac1 activity
through binding and ubiquitinating the GTP-bound form of Rac1, leading to its proteasomal degradation131415. Transgenic mice overexpressing Rac1 exhibit the phenotype of cardiac
hypertrophy and DCM29. To test the possibility that
upregulated Rac1 may
contribute to the heart failure phenotype in Hace1sTACmice, we subjected sTAC hearts to Rac1 immunoblotting. No significant changes in Rac1 protein levels were detected
between Hace1
and WT groups (Supplementary Fig
4a). Although we cannot exclude the possibility that Rac1 may participate in the cardiac
remodelling process under stress, at least in the particular experimental
settings that we have tested, Rac1 does not appear to be regulated by Hace1. A report by Zhao et
al.17 indicated that HACE1 is a novel repressor of retinoic
acid receptor (RAR) transcription, a role that is independent from its E3 Ub
ligase activity. This suggests that HACE1 has additional function(s) beyond its role as an E3 Ub
ligase. To explore this further, we subjected sTAC hearts to RAR-β immunoblotting. We
detected no significant changes in RAR-β protein levels between Hace1
and WT groups (Supplementary Fig
4b). This suggests that RAR-β did not significantly contribute to the
heart failure phenotype in the Hace1sTACmice.Besides the HECT domain, the other known domain of HACE1 is the six ankyrin repeats (ANK)
at its amino terminal. However, the function of the ANK domain in HACE1 is entirely unknown. On the basis
of our finding that HACE1
promotes ubiquitinated protein aggregate clearance independently of its E3
ligase activity, we hypothesize that HACE1 functions as an adaptor protein, binding to
ubiquitinated proteins and delivering them for autophagic degradation via
HACE1’s ANK
domain.To test this hypothesis, three GFP-tagged HACE1 plasmids, WT HACE1-GFP, HACE1ΔHECT-mGFP and HACE1ΔANK-mGFP, were
generated. The two mutant HACE1 constructs were generated by DNA synthesis with
deletion of either the carboxy-terminal HECT domain (ΔHECT) or the
N-terminal ANK repeat (ΔANK; Fig. 4a). After
transient transfection of the plasmid into Hace1
MEF, MEF were subjected to a protein aggregate clearance assay. Similar to WT
HACE1 (Fig. 4b), HACE1Δ HECT localized to ubiquitinated protein
aggregates in puromycin-treated MEF. Moreover, similar to WT HACE1, the majority of HACE1Δ HECT cells were able
to clear aggregates by 8 h after puromycin removal (Fig. 4c). In
contrast, HACE1ΔANK
did not localize with ubiquitinated protein aggregates and lost the ability to
clear aggregates after puromycin removal (Fig. 4d).
Therefore, HACE1 is required
for efficient clearance of protein aggregates and this is independent of its E3
ligase activity. Instead, HACE1 may participate in the delivery of ubiquitinated
protein aggregates to the autophagic lysosomal pathway for degradation via
protein–protein interactions mediated by its ANK domain.
Figure 4
ANK domain in HACE1 is
necessary for autophagic removal of Ub+ protein
aggregates.
(a) Diagrams representing GFP-tagged WT HACE1 and mutant HACE1 (HACE1Δ HECT and
HACE1Δ ANK)
constructs transiently transfected into Hace1
MEF for protein aggregate clearance assay. (b–d)
Representative confocal micrographs of (b) WT, (c)
ΔHECT and (d) ΔANK MEF subjected to protein
aggregate clearance assay by pulsing with puromycin for 4 h to
induce protein aggregate formation followed by an 8-h chase to monitor for
aggregate clearance. Vehicle-treated MEFs were used as control. Scale bars,
10 μm.
HACE1 partners with
p62 in protein aggregate
clearance
The adaptor protein p62 has
the ability to bind to both ubiquitinated proteins and LC3II (ref. 30). In the Hace1sTAC heart, we observed a significant increase in p62-positive puncta (Fig. 2d). To determine whether HACE1 co-localized with p62, Hace1
NCM transiently expressing HACE1-GFP were subjected to p62 immunofluorescent staining. Under
control conditions, HACE1
expressed uniformly across the cytoplasm, mostly not localizing with
p62. However, on
puromycin treatment, both
HACE1 and p62 relocated to the perinuclear region
and, more importantly, co-localized (Fig. 5a). This
indicates that HACE1 may
control protein aggregate degradation via regulation of p62. To further address whether
HACE1 partners with
p62 in protein aggregate
clearance, we depleted p62 by
short interfering RNA (siRNA) in Hace1+/+ and Hace1MEFs (Supplementary Fig. 5a) and
subjected cells to a protein aggregate clearance assay. Knockdown of
p62 partially restored
ubiquitinated protein aggregate degradation in Hace1
MEF (Supplementary Fig. 5b),
suggesting p62 could be a
downstream target of HACE1.
It has been reported that p62
promotes the formation of polyubiquitinated protein aggregates to allow
clearance via autophagy243031. Therefore, in
HACE1 knock-out cells,
where autophagy is impaired, p62 knockdown would inhibit aggregate formation but
presumably not total cellular ubiquitination and toxicity. To test whether E3 Ub
ligase activity is involved in HACE1’s interaction with p62, WT, Hace1MEFs and Hace1
MEF stably transfected with either WT HACE1 (WT-HACE1) or a C876S-mutant form HACE1(C876S) were treated with
MG132, a specific, potent
and cell permeable proteasome inhibitor that reduces the degradation of
Ub-conjugated proteins in mammalian cells32333435,
for 4 h to induce ubiquitinated protein aggregates formation. When
p62-immunoprecipitated
samples were subjected to immunobloting with FK2 (Ub-conjugated proteins)
antibody, we observed increased Ub-conjugated proteins in Hace1
MEF. Adding either WT or C876S mutant back to Hace1
MEF decreased the pull-down of UB-conjugated proteins to a similar level as WT
(Supplementary Fig 5c). Our
data indicate that HACE1
expression can affect p62
levels independently of its E3 Ub ligase activity. Therefore, HACE1 may serve as an adaptor for
autophagy in addition to its role in protein degradation via the
Ub–proteasome pathway.
Figure 5
HACE1 contributes to
autophagic clearance of protein aggregates in a p62-dependent manner.
(a) Fluorescence microscopy images showing HACE1 (green) co-aggregating with
p62 (red) in the
perinuclear space on puromycin treatment (8 h) in Hace1
NCM transiently expressing HACE1-GFP. p62 was visualized by immunofluorescent staining. Arrows
indicate co-localized puncta. (b) Representative confocal images
showing HACE1 (red)
localizes to LC3+ puncta (green) induced by
MG132 treatment
(8 h) in Hace1GFP-Lc3
NCM cells transiently expressing HACE1-RFP. Arrows indicate co-localized puncta.
(c) Primary NCMs from Hace1+/+Lc3 and
Hace1Lc3
newborn pups were treated with or without MG132 for 8 h and the
cell lysates were subjected to western blot with anti-GFP antibodies. Gapdh
was used as a loading control. (d) Fluorescence microscopy images
showing co-localization of HACE1 (green) with Lamp1 (red) on MG132 treatment (8 h) in Hace1NCM
cells transiently expressing HACE1-GFP. Lamp1 was visualized by immunofluorescent staining.
Scale bar, 10 μm in all images.
HACE1 is required for
the completion of autophagic flux
The above findings are consistent with the notion that HACE1 is a novel potential regulator of
the selective autophagy pathway. Next, we tried to determine in which step of
autophagy HACE1 participates.
Changes in gene expression from a panel of autophagy-related genes were analysed
by quantitative PCR in sTAC and sham hearts. We found no significant differences
in expression between WT and Hace1sTAC hearts in genes related to autophagy initiation such as Atg5, Atg7 and Beclin1 (Supplementary Fig. 6). This indicates that
the induction phase of autophagy is not affected by Hace1 deficiency.Autophagy is a dynamic process with autophagosome formation being balanced by
turnover on delivery to lysosomes. Inhibition of lysosome-mediated degradation
will block LC3 degradation
and hence increase LC3
accumulation20. Enhanced LC3 accumulation in Hace1sTAC heart (Fig. 2h) suggests that HACE1deficiency could block autophagic
flux. To verify this, HACE1’s interaction with LC3 was examined in Hace1/GFP-LC3 NCM
transiently expressing HACE1-RFP. Blockade of UPS by proteasome inhibition has been
shown to activate autophagy32333435. Exposure of the
NCM to MG132 led to the
co-localization of HACE1 with
LC3 puncta (Fig. 5b). In addition, when we subjected MG132-treated Hace1/GFP-LC3 NCM
and control Hace1+/+/GFP-LC3 NCM
cells to LC3 immunoblot
analysis, HACE1 deficiency
clearly led to increased GFP-LC3 accumulation in Hace1/GFP-LC3 NCM
compared with WT control (Fig. 5c). This suggests that
lysosome-mediated degradation is impaired in the absence of HACE1. Indeed, HACE1-GFP-labelled structures also
co-localized with the lysosomal marker, Lamp1 (Fig. 5d), suggesting that
HACE1 may be required for
autolysosome formation.To determine whether HACE1 is
required for the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, we used a tandem
tagged mRFP-GFP-LC3
(tfLC3) probe. This
probe can be used to detect whether an autophagosome has fused with a lysosome,
based on the distinct chemical properties of GFP and mRFP fluorophores. Under
neutral pH conditions in the cytosol, both GFP and mRFP moieties of the probe
fluoresce. However, under low pH conditions in the lumen of the lysosome, the
GFP signal is quenched, but not the mRFP. By exploiting the difference in the
nature of these two fluorescent proteins, autophagic flux can be measured with
this mRFP-GFP-LC3 tandem
probe36.First, we tested the tfLC3 reporter in WT and Hace1
primary NCMs 48 h after transient transfection with
tfLC3 plasmid.
NCM were treated with MG132
for 8 h to induce autophagy, as previously described34. In addition, bafilomycin
A1 (Baf),
an inhibitor of lysosomal acidification, was added to one of the MG132-treated groups in the last
4 h to inhibit autolysosome formation. MG132 is capable of inducing autophagy
in WT and Hace1
NCM, as measured by increased GFP-LC3-positive puncta compared with the untreated group (Fig. 6a). However, fewer green/red autophagosomes and more
red-only autolysosomes were detected in MG132-treated Hace1 WT NCM, and treatment with Baf reversed this pattern. In contrast,
loss of Hace1 resulted in a
significant increase in green/red-positive autophagosome structures with a
reduction in red-only autolysosome structures in the absence of Baf as shown in Hace1
NCM. In addition, no significant changes were observed in Hace1
NCM co-treated with Baf
(Fig. 6a,b). This indicates that there is a defect in
autophagosome–lysosome fusion in Hace1-deficient cardiomyocytes. To test whether the E3
ligase activity of Hace1, if
required for this process, we next tested the tfLC3 reporter in
Hace1
MEF stably transfected with empty vector (MSCV), WT HACE1 (HA-HACE1) and E3 ligase dead
HACE1
(C876S-HACE1).
WT MEF was used as a control. After 4 h incubation with MG132, WT MEF had fewer green/red
autophagosomes and more red autolysosomes; in contrast, significantly increased
green/red-positive autophagosome structures and reduced red-positive-only
autolysosome structures were observed in Hace1
(MSCV) MEF. As expected, the defects in
autophagosome–lysosome fusion in Hace1
MEF were rescued by WT HACE1.
Moreover, E3 ligase mutation in HACE1 (C876S MEF cells) results in similar
mRFP-GFP-LC3 expression
patterns as WT (Fig. 6c,d). This suggests that
HACE1 is required for the
fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes independent of its E3 ligase
activity.
Figure 6
Hace1 is essential for the
completion of autophagic flux.
(a,b) Primary NCMs from WT and Hace1
newborn pups and (c,d) WT and Hace1
MEF, as well as Hace1
MEF stably transfected with WT HACE1 and C876S-mutant HACE1, were transiently transfected
with a tandem tagged mRFP-GFP-LC3 reporter (tfLC3) plasmid, followed by 8 h
treatment with MG132 or
MG132 plus
Baf in the last
4 h, and were subjected to confocal microscopy. DMSO treatment only was used in the
control group. (a,c) Representative confocal micrographs of
images used for quantification of the percentage of yellow dots in b
and d. At least 10 images from each group were used for the
calculation; error bars represent s.e.m., P-value as indicated
(one-way ANAVO). Scale bars, 10 μm. Autophagosomes show
both GFP and mRFP-LC3
signals (yellow) while autolysosomes exhibit mRFP-L3 signals only (red).
HACE1 is required for
maintaining protein homoeostasis
To identify HACE1-interacting
proteins, a combination of co-immunoprecipitation assay (Co-IP) with mass
spectrometry (MS) analysis was conducted in Hace1
MEF stably expressing an N-terminal haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged full-length
HACE1 protein
(HA-HACE1)12. Empty vector (MSCV)-transfected Hace1MEFs were used as controls. HA-tagged HACE1 protein expression was readily detectable in
HA-HACE1-transfected MEF but not in the empty vector
(MSCV)-transfected MEF (Fig. 7a). After
resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), coomassie
blue staining detected several distinct bands in the anti-HA Co-IP pull-down
products from HA-HACE1 MEF
lysates but not in the control Hace1MSCV MEF (Fig. 7b). The anti-HA Co-IP pull-down products
were further subjected to MS analysis. We performed a total of five experimental
replicates for HA-HACE1-expressing MEF and four experimental replicates for
control Hace1MSCV-MEF. A total of 173 different proteins were identified from all nine
purifications with 158 identified in any of the five HA-HACE1 purifications. To identify
potential HACE1 interactors
of high confidence, the proteins were filtered by selecting proteins that were
found in more than or equal to two HA-HACE1 purifications, and then were found to be at least
twofold enriched, by spectral counts, in the HA-HACE1 purification when compared with
the control sample. This data reduction yielded 73 potential binding partners
(Fig. 7c and Supplementary Table 1).
Figure 7
Identification of HACE1
interacting proteins by MS analysis of HA Co-IP.
(a,b) Hace1
MEF cells were stably transfected with HA-tagged WT HACE1 (HA-HACE1) and empty vector MSCV.
(a) Immunoblot for HA shows stable expression of HA-tagged
HACE1 in
HA-HACE1 MEF cell
lysate. (b) HA-HACE1 MEF and control MSCV MEF cell lysates were
subjected to Co-IP with anti-HA antibody and coomassie blue staining shows a
couple of distinct bands only detected in HA-HACE1 MEF IP pull-down as indicated
by red arrows. (c–f) Identification of
HACE1 interacting
proteins by MS analysis of Co-IP products. (c) Hierarchical
clustering (heat) map demonstrating the clustering of proteins based on
their expression intensities in HA-HACE1 MEF and control MSCV MEF HA-IP pull-down products.
To the left of the heat map, selected annotations found to be enriched in
the protein clusters are shown. n=5 for HA-HACE1 group and n=4 for
control MSCV group. (d) Pie chart shows enriched representative
HACE1-interacting
proteins according to molecular function by GO term. (e) Selected
HACE1-interacting
proteins identified by HA-IP MS were evaluated by western blot with the
indicated antibodies (IB). HA-HACE1 denotes HA-IP pull-down from HA-HACE1 MEF; MSCV denotes HA-IP
pull-down from control MSCV MEF; and input indicates HA-HACE1 MEF lysate before IP.
(f) HA-HACE1
MEF and control MSCV MEF lysates were subjected to co-IP with an
anti-Unc-45b antibody
and the pull-down were analysed by western blot with an anti-HA antibody.
(g,h) HA-IP pull-down products from HA-HACE1 MEF (HA-HACE1) and Hace1 KO MSCV MEF (MSCV)
immortalized in HA beads were further subjected to Co-Co-IP with WT mouse
heart lysates, and the pull-down products were analysed by western blot
using the indicated antibodies. HACE1 and those proteins with which it interacts were
still detectable (g). There were also increased ubiquitinated
proteins in the Co-Co-IP heart tissues (h).
A gene ontology term enrichment analysis was performed to determine which
molecular functions and biological processes were over-represented. Gene names
corresponding to the 73 proteins found in multiple HA-HACE1 purifications were submitted for
statistical enrichment of gene ontology pathway analysis using the Gene Ontology
For Functional Analysis software tools in ArrayTrack (ArrayTrack http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/BioinformaticsTools/Arraytrack)37. Terms associated with ‘cytoskeletal binding
and organization’, ‘the unfolded protein
response’ and ‘protein complex disassembly’
were found to be statistically enriched (P≤0.05,
n≥5, E>2, Fisher’s exact test; Fig. 7d). Among them, several cytoskeletal proteins like
gelsolin38, Fhl1 (refs 39, 40, 41) and vinculin4243 were found to be the
important mediators of cardiomyopathy. Western blot analysis confirmed that
p62, gelsolin and Unc-45b are among these binding
partners of HACE1 (Fig. 7e). Moreover, when Co-IP was performed of the same MEF
lysate with anti Unc-45b
antibody, HA-HACE1 was
readily detectable (Fig. 7f). In addition, when the
HA-HACE1 MEF Co-IP
pull-down complex were further bound with whole-heart lysate (Co-Co-IP) from
HACE1 WT mice,
HACE1 and its interaction
proteins p62, Unc-45b, Hsc70, gelsolin and caldesmon 1 were still detectable
(Fig. 7g). Furthermore, there were also increased
ubiquitinated proteins in the Co-Co-IPs from heart tissues (Fig.
7h). This indicates that HACE1 is binding to these proteins in the heart in addition
to MEF.
Accumulation of Hace1
binding partners in Hace1−/− sTAC
heart
On the basis of above observations, we predicted that proteins interacting with
HACE1 would accumulate in
the hearts of sTAC-treated Hace1mice. We tested whether HACE1
deficiency results in accumulation of those proteins in the stressed myocardium
in vivo under haemodynamic stress. We observed significantly
increased accumulation of many HACE1-interacting proteins, such as Fhl1, vimentin, Unc-45b, galdesmon 1,
β-tubulin (Fig. 8a,d), gelsolin and vinculin (Fig.
8b,d) in the Hace1sTAC heart compared with Hace1 controls. Molecular
chaperones Hsp70, Hsc70 and
Hsp25 were also
significantly accumulated in the Hace1sTAC heart (Fig. 8c,d). In addition, expression levels of
control proteins that were not identified in our HACE1 Co-IP assay, like connexin 40 and connexin 43, were not affected by
Hace1 deficiency (Supplementary Fig. 7). Thus,
HACE1 deficiency leads to
the accumulation of its binding partners under haemodynamic stress in the
heart.
Figure 8
Proteins interacting with HACE1 accumulate in Hace1
sTAC heart.
(a–c) Representative western blots and (d)
quantification show increased accumulation of some of the HACE1-interacting proteins in the
Hace1
sTAC myocardium. n=3 mice per group, error bars represent s.e.m.,
P-value between KO and WT sTAC as indicated (one-way analysis of
variance). Gapdh was used as a loading control.
Discussion
Levine and colleagues recently demonstrated that the HECT domain E3 ligase
SMURF1 promotes degradation
of viral capsid proteins independently of its E3 ligase activity but requiring its
membrane-binding C2 domain44. These authors proposed that the
C2 domain of SMURF1 may
participate in the delivery of selective autophagic substrates to the nascent
autophagosome. In this manner, SMURF1 may participate in both proteasomal degradation (via its
E3 ligase activity) and autophagy (via its C2 domain). Both HACE1 and SMURF1 belong to the HECT domain E3 ligase
family. The difference is instead of the C2 domain, HACE1 has an ANK repeat domain at its N
terminal and the function of this domain in HACE1 has not been explored. We demonstrated here that
HACE1, similar to
SMURF1, is a dual function E3
ligase that can promote degradation of selective cargo by at least two independent
mechanisms that differ in their requirement for E3 ligase activity. HACE1 participates in proteasomal
degradation via its HECT domain E3 ligase activity and contributes to autophagic
degradation via its ANK domain-mediated protein–protein interactions.Remarkably, the role of HACE1 in
cellular proteostasis only becomes apparent under stress. This may indicate that
redundant pathways of protein degradation can complement for HACE1 deficiency in the basal state, and
that these pathways are impaired or inadequate during cellular stress. Our data
indicate that HACE1 deficiency
impairs autophagy in the heart during haemodynamic stress. Besides catalysing the
ubiquitination of active Rac1
(refs 13, 14, 15), the roles of HACE1 in mediating Golgi traffic16,
suppression of RAR signalling17 and the degradation of specific
proteins may underlie this autophagy defect.Many HACE1-interacting proteins
are associated with cytoskeletal function. A properly balanced cytoskeletal quality
control is essential for cellular and organismal structure and function454647. The maintenance of cardiac cytoskeletal homoeostasis
becomes even more essential in the context of disease, where appropriate remodelling
is necessary for survival. Cytoskeleton-specific chaperones and Ub ligases are
necessary for the assembly and degradation of cytoskeletal proteins and constitute
the protein quality control system in the heart45. However,
very little is known about the actual mechanisms responsible for regulating the
turnover of the cardiac cytoskeleton46. A recent study
suggested that specific Ub E3 protein ligases regulate degradation pathways for
actin (via TRIM32)46 and tubulin (via Parkin)47. There is also evidence that the
co-chaperones Unc-45 and Hsp90 are required for myosin quality control4. In the present study, we found HACE1 physically binding with Unc-45B both by IP and reverse IP (Fig. 7e–f). When we subjected the Co-IP products to
MS analysis; indeed, proteins associated with cytoskeleton binding and organization
and the unfolded protein response and protein complex disassembly were enriched
(Fig. 7c,d). This suggests that HACE1 may form a complex with Unc-45b, Hsc70, Hsp90 as well as other chaperons and
cytoskeletal binding and organization proteins to facilitate the proper organization
and turnover of cytoskeletal proteins. Thus, our data suggest that HACE1 is a stress inducible, selective
safeguard for cytoskeleton homoeostasis that is required for normal cardiac
responses to haemodynamic stress.In conclusion, we present herein for the first time that HACE1 is a key regulator of the
Ub-selective autophagy pathway. Moreover HACE1’s functions in selective autophagy is
independent of its E3 Ub ligase activity, but via protein–protein
interactions mediated by its ANK domain. We propose that HACE1 could be the missed master regulator
in the control of autophagic degradation of damaged organelle and proteins. Our
in vivo studies demonstrate that HACE1 is a novel critical regulator of cardiac hypertrophy and
remodelling. Our findings that HACE1 is upregulated in cardiac tissue of heart failurepatients
both make it an attractive candidate as a potential diagnostic biomarker for heart
failure and provide an insight into the mechanisms of cardiac remodelling.
Methods
Detection of HACE1
mRNA
The collection and use of human samples in this study were approved by the
Research Ethics Board of University Health Network and informed consent was
obtained from patients/family members. HACE1 mRNA expression in human and mouse samples was
detected by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)–PCR
analyses using standard procedures. Isolation of total RNA was performed using
the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNAs were synthesized from
1 μg total RNA with the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT–PCR
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative RT–PCR was done using SYBR green assays (Roche Applied
Science) with HACE1-specific primers and both HPRT and GAPDH as an
endogenous control. Real-time PCR reactions were carried out in 384-well plates
using a Roche-LightCycler 480 System. All primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Mice strains and creation of pressure overload mouse model
Hace1-null mice with a
mixed B6;129Ola genetic background were generated as reported previously12, subsequently backcrossed to C57BL/6J mice (Jackson
Laboratory) for more than six generations and used for all the experiments
reported in this study. GFP-LC3#53 transgenic mice21 were
imported from RIKEN Bio-Resource Center and were crossed with Hace1mice
to generate Hace1/GFP-LC3 or
Hace1/GFP-LC3
mice. Mice were genotyped by PCR12 and maintained at the
Animal Resources Centre of the University Health Network. All animal
experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the
University Health Network and performed in accordance with the institutional
guidelines.Male Hace1
and Hace1mice
(15–17-week old) with body weight from 27 to 29 g were
subjected to pressure overload by sTAC as previously described13. In brief, mice were anaesthetized with ketamine (IP;
90 mg kg−1) and
Rompun (IP;
10 mg kg−1). The chest was
opened, and a horizontal skin incision was made at the level of the two to three
intercostal space. The start of the descending aorta was identified right after
the subclavian branch. A 7-0 silk suture was placed around the beginning of the
descending aorta and tied around a 27-gauge blunt needle, which was subsequently
removed. At the end of the procedure, the chest and skin were closed. The mice
were kept on a heating pad until responsive to stimuli. Sham-operated animals
underwent the identical procedure, except that the aortic constriction was not
placed. The integrity of the sTAC operation was confirmed by measuring the
systolic pressure gradient shortly after the operation, which generated a
systematic increase in systolic pressure from sham-
(78 mm Hg) to sTAC (170 mm Hg)
-operated heart. Owing to the high early mortality rate of the Hace1mice post sTAC, the experiment was only carried out for 4 days.
Cardiac function evaluation
Cardiac function was evaluated prior to sTAC and at day 2 and day 4 after sTAC
using echocardiography as described previously 2. In brief, mice were sedated
with 1% isoflurane/oxygen, and echocardiographic images were recorded using an
Acuson Sequoia C256 System (Siemens Medical Solutions) with a 15L8 transducer.
Depth and frequency were set at 2 cm and 13 MHz,
respectively. The heart was first imaged in 2D mode in the parasternal
short-axis view. From this view, an M-mode cursor was positioned perpendicular
to the interventricular septum and posterior wall of the Left ventricular (LV)
at the level of the papillary muscles, and M-mode images were obtained for
measurement of wall thickness and chamber dimensions with the use of the
leading-edge convention adapted by the American Society of Echocardiography. LV
end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) were
measured; percentage of LV fractional shortening (%FS) was described as
[(LVEDD-LVESD)/(LVEDD) × 100%].
Histology, immunohistochemistry and TEM
For morphometry, hearts were arrested in diastole with 1 M
KCl, fixed with neutral
buffered 10% formalin solution (Sigma HT501128), embedded in paraffin and
sectioned to a thickness of 5 μm. Haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were used for
measurement of heart morphology and cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area using
SimplePCI version 6 image analysis
software (Hamamatsu Corporation). For
immunohistochemistry, samples were fixed with buffered 4% paraformaldehyde, and
paraffin sections were performed with minimal antigen retrieval (0.3% Triton
X-100) using the following antibodies: mono- and polyubiquitinylated conjugates
(FK2) (Enzo Life Science, PW8810, 1:100), p62 (Progen, GP62C, 1:100), GFP (Life Technologies, G10362,
1:200). Following overnight incubation with primary antibody, the sections were
incubated with a matching biotinylated secondary antibody and detected by using
VECTASTAIN ABC (peroxidase) system
(Vector Labs). Negative controls were performed
for all immunostaining by omission of the primary antibody. For TEM analysis,
fresh isolated LV were minced into 1–2 mm3
cubes and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for
1 h at room temperature. Finally, the tissue was cut into
70 nm sections with an ultramicrotome, placed on TEM grids and imaged
with a FEI Tecnai TEM operated at 80 kV at the Pathology Laboratory
of the Hospital for Sick Children according to standard procedures.
Immunoblotting
Whole-cell lysates from tissue and cell samples were prepared on ice with cell
lysis buffer (Cell Signaling, 9803) containing a Complete cocktail of proteases
inhibitors (Roche Applied Science, 05892791001). Lysates were cleared by
centrifugation at 12,000 r.p.m. for 10 min. The
supernatants were collected and protein concentrations determined using the
Bio-Rad Bradford protein assay kit
(Bio-Rad). Twenty micrograms of protein lysate
was separated by NuPAGE SDS–PAGE Gel
System (Life Technologies) and
electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
(Invitrogen). Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C
with antibodies reactive to the following proteins: ubiquitin (P4D1) (Cell
Signaling, 3936, 1:1,000), p62 (Progen, GP62C, 1:1,000), LC3 (Novus, NB100-2331, 1:500), GFP
(Life Technologies, A11121), HA (Monoclonal Antibody Facility, Hospital for Sick
Children, 12CA5, 1:1,000), Unc-45b (GenWay, EV0087,1:1,000), gelsolin (BD, 610412, 1:1,000),
vimentin (R28) (Cell
Signaling, 3932, 1:1,000), Fhl1 (Novus, NB100-1461, 1:1,000) vinculin (Sigma, V4505, 1:1,000),
β-tubulin (Sigma, T8328, 1:1,000), caldesmon (Abcam, ab32330,
1:1,000), Hsc70 (Abcam,
ab2788, 1:1,000), Hsp70 (Stressgen, SPA810, 1:1,000), Hsp25 (Stressgen, SPA801, 1:1,000),
connexin 40 (Life
Technologies, 36-5000, 1:1,000) and connexin
43 (Life Technologies, 71-0700, 1:1,000). Blots were
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad,
170-5046, 1:50,000), goat anti-rabbit IgG (Bio-Rad, 170-5047, 1:100,000),
monoclonal mouse anti-goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 205-032-176, 1:50,000)
or goat anti-guinea pig IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 106-035-003, 1:100,000) and
developed using ECL or ECL Plus Western Blotting
Detection System (Amersham Biosciences).
To normalize signals to total protein, blot membranes were stripped and
re-probed with antibody against Gapdh (Cell Signaling, 2118, 1:2,000). The
quantification of signals was performed by densitometry of scanned
autoradiographs with the aid of Quantity One software (version 4.6;
Bio-Rad).Proteasome activities were measured by the Chemicon Proteasome Activity Assay Kit (Millipore, APT280). In brief, freshly harvested heart samples
were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl and 1% Triton X-100) supplemented
with 2 mM ATP and
were cleared by centrifuge at 15,000 r.p.m. for 20 min at
4 °C. Equal amounts of protein (determined by Bio-Rad
Bradford protein assay) were used for preparing assay mixtures in a 96-well
fluorometer plate and the remaining steps were conducted following the
manufacturer’s instruction. Fluorescence data were collected using a
Molecular Devices Spectra Max M5 plate reader using 380 nm excitation
and 460 nm emission.
Culture of mouse neonatal ventricular cardiomyocytes
Cell culture of neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes was prepared from newborn
Hace1
and WT mouse hearts within 48 h of birth. In brief, after trimming,
left ventricles were mechanically minced in Ca2+- and
Mg2+-free Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) on
ice, and then subjected to stepwise enzymatic digestion with 0.15% trypsin
(Invitrogen) in disassociation solution
(137 mmol l−1
NaCl,
5.36 mmol l−1
KCl,
0.81 mmol l−1
MgSO4,
5.55 mmol l−1
dextrose,
0.44 mmol l−1
KH2PO4,
0.34 mmol l−1
Na2HPO47H2O and
20.06 mmol l−1
HEPES, pH 7.4). Cells
released after the first digestion were discarded, whereas cells from subsequent
digestion were transferred into GIBCO DMEM/F-12 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) until all cardiac cells were
isolated (~5 times). The resulting mixture was centrifuged for
5 min at 800 r.p.m., resuspended in DMEM/F-12 medium and
preplated for 2 h to remove non-cardiomyocytes based on the
observation that non-muscle cells attach to the substrata more rapidly. The
cardiomyocytes were then collected and plated on laminin-coated culture plates
at a density of 2 × 106
cells ml−1 in DMEM/F-12 plus 10% FBS
and 0.1 μM 5-bromodeoxyuridine (to inhibit growth of non-myocytes).
Cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a
humidified atmosphere. A confluent monolayer of spontaneously beating
cardiomyocytes was formed within 2 days and was ready for downstream gene
transfer and treatment.
Protein aggregate clearance assay
Protein aggregate clearance assays were performed with both neonatal NCMs and MEF
cell culture. MEF cells were prepared from hace1
or littermate WT E13.5 mouse embryos and were grown in DMEM (Invitrogen)
containing 10% FBS (Invitrogen),
10 units ml−1
penicillin (Invitrogen) and
0.1 μg ml−1
streptomycin (Invitrogen).
Hace1
MEF stably expressing WT HACE1, C876S E3 ligase dead mutant (HACE1C876S) and empty vector
were generated using a retroviral system as described previously11. The three GFP-tagged HACE1 plasmids used for transient transfection into
hace1
MEF were from OriGene; pCMV-AC-HACE1-GFP (RG205602), HACE1ΔHECT and
HACE1ΔAN were generated by gene synthesis and
subcloned into pCMV-AC-mGFP plasmid (OriGene). For protein aggregate
clearance assay, MEF cells were grown on Millicell EZ slides (Millipore) to
about 70% confluence and were treated with
10 μg ml−1
puromycin (Sigma, P8833) for
4 h to induce ubiquitinated protein aggregate formation, followed by
extensive washing. Aggregate clearance was followed for a further 8 h
(total 12 h) incubation with fresh medium. Non-treated MEFs were used
as negative controls. After treatment, MEF were washed three times in PBS,
followed by fixing in 4% paraformaldehyde and were subjected to fluorescence
staining for Ub-conjugated protein with an anti-FK2 antibody (Enzo Life Science,
PW8810, 1:100). In brief, fixed cells on the slides were first permeabilized for
2 min in 0.1% Triton-X 100, and then blocked for 1 h in
PBS with 3% normal goat serum and 1% BSA. Slides were next incubated overnight
at 4 °C with FK2 antibody, followed by staining with Alexa
Fluor 633 goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies, A21052, 1:1,000) for
1 h. After being nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies,
H1399), cells were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Life
Technologies, P-36934) and subjected to confocal examination on an Olympus
FluoView 1000 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope. The total fluorescence
intensity from the FK2 staining was measured using Olympus Fluoview FV1000
viewer software.
Small interference RNA and p62 immunoprecipitation
Knockdown of p62 in
Hace1+/+ and Hace1
NCMs was achieved using ON-TARGET plus SMARTpool mouseSqstm1 (p62) siRNAs (Thermo/Dhamacon
l-047628-01); ON-TARGET plus non-targeting siRNA pool (D-001810-01) were
used as control. DharmaFECT 1 Transfection Reagent (T-2001) was used to
transfect siRNAs in a final concentration of 20 nM to NCM cells and
knockdown of p62 mRNA was
confirmed by RT–PCR using p62 gene-specific primers. Forty-eight hours after
knockdown, cells were subjected to protein aggregate clearance assay as
illustrated in the above section. p62 immunoprecipitation was performed by using Pierce Classic Magnetic IP/Co-IP kit
(Thermo Scientific, 88804) with guinea pig
polyclonal anti-p62 (Progen,
GP62C 1:100) as IP antibody; and the pull-down products were analysed by western
blot with anti-mono and polyubiquitin-conjugated antibody (FK2) (Enzo Life
Sciences, BML-PW01510, 1:1,000).
Plasmid transfection and microscopy
Transient transfection of plasmid constructs into both primary mouse NCM and MEF
was carried out by using the Transfection
Reagent Xfect (Clontech, 631318) or a
Neon Transfection System (Life Technologies) according to standard protocols.
HACE1 expression plasmids
pCMV6-AC-HACE1-GFP and pCMV6-AC-HACE1-RFP were from OriGene.
The tandem tagged mRFP-GFP-LC3 reporter (tfLC3) plasmid was from Addgene.
Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were treated with either
10 μg ml−1
puromycin or
1 μM MG132 with or without 100 nM Baf for the indicated time, followed by
washing three times in PBS. Cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde,
permeabilized for 2 min in 0.1% Triton-X 100 and then blocked for
1 h in PBS with 3% normal goat serum and 1% BSA. For the tandem
tagged mRFP-GFP-LC3
reporter assay, cells were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Invitrogen, P-36931) and
subjected to confocal examination on an Olympus FluoView 1,000 Laser Scanning
Confocal Microscope. Co-localization efficiency of mRFP with GFP signals of
tfLC3 puncta was measured
using ImageJ software, and has been shown as the percentage of the total number
of mRFP puncta.For HACE1 co-localization with
p62 and Lamp1, an immunostaining step with
anti-p62 (Progen, GP62C)
and anti-Lamp1 antibody
(C-20) (Santa Cruz Biotech) was added before confocal examining. For
HA-HACE1 co-localization
with Ub+ protein aggregates, HA-HACE1 was detected with an anti-HA
mouseIgG1 monoclonal antibody prelabelled with the Zenon Alexa Fluor 488 MouseIgG1 Labeling Kit (Life Technologies, Z-25002); Ub-conjugated proteins were
labelled using an anti-FK2 antibody (Enzo Life Science, PW8810, 1:100), followed
by staining with Alexa Fluor 633goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies,
A21052,1:1,000). Fluorescence microscopy was carried out on a Nikon Eclipse
TE2000-U.
Generation of HACE-expressing MEF and immunoprecipitation
Hace1
MEF stably expressing an N-terminal HA-tagged full-length humanHACE1 cDNA (HA-HACE1) was generated using a
retroviral system as described previously11. In brief,
HA-tagged HACE1cDNA
was generated by subcloning the HACE1 coding region from the IMAGE cDNA clone number
4838835 (ATCC; GenBank accession number BC034982) into mammalian expression
vector pcDNA3-HA (Life Technologies). The HA-tagged Cys to Ser mutant (C876S) form of
HACE1 was
generated by Site directed mutagenesis using the QuickChange kit (Stratagene). HA-tagged HACE1 cDNA was subsequently subcloned into
pMSCV-hygromycin vector (Clontech) followed by transfection into the
BOSC23 ecotropic retroviral packaging cell line using calcium phosphate
precipitation. Retrovirus-containing supernatants were collected 48 h
after transfection and used to infect Hace1
MEF. To generate stably transfected MEF cells, infected cells were selected
using 200 μg ml−1
hygromycin (Life Technologies) for 48 h.The HACE1 immunoprecipitation
(IP) analysis was performed using anti-HA Affinity Matrix (Roche Applied
Science, 11 815 016 001); for Unc-45b IP, immunoprecipitation kit (Protein G) (Roche
Applied Science, 11 719 836 001) with goat polyclonal anti Unc-45b (GenWay, EV0087, 1:50) as IP
antibody. Equal amounts of cell lysate were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or
anti-Unc-45b and were
subjected to SDS–PAGE and immunoblotted with the indicated
antibodies. To confirm that HACE1 is also binding to the same proteins as in the heart,
the anti-HA Affinity Matrix that has been incubated with HA-HACE1 MEF or control MSCV MEF lysates
was further incubated with whole-heart lysate (Co-Co-IP) from HACE1 WT mice and equal amounts of
eluate were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies.
MS analysis
To map out the molecular interaction of HACE1, we examined the anti-HA Co-IP products by MS
analysis, essentially as previously described4148. In
brief, samples were subjected to an in-solution tryptic digestion and then
subjected to solid-phase extraction using OMIX
C-18 pipette tips (Varian Inc.). MS
experiments were carried out on a LTQ linear
ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher
Scientific) equipped with a nanoelectrospray source (Proxeon
Biosystems, Denmark). Peptides were eluted from the microcapillary columns using
a 2-h gradient as described41. Spectra were identified by
converting Raw MS files to m/z XML using ReAdW and searched by a locally
installed version of X!Tandem against a mouse IPI (International Protein Index;
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI)
protein sequence database created on August 2010. To estimate and minimize our
false-positive rate, the protein sequence database also contained every IPI
protein sequence in its reversed amino-acid orientation (target-decoy strategy)
as recently described4148. In this study we set the value
of total reverse spectra to total forward spectra to 0.5%, resulting in a low
number of decoy sequences in the final output. Only peptides matching these
criteria were accepted to generate the final list of identified proteins, with
further criteria set to select only those proteins identified with a minimum of
two unique peptides.
Statistical analysis
For all multiple comparisons of normally distributed data, one-way analysis of
variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-tests were
used, while for comparison of two groups of normally distributed data as shown
in Fig. 1b, unpaired two-tailed Student’s
t-tests were used. Survival rates were analysed by the
Kaplan–Meier method, and difference between groups was tested with
the log-rank χ2-test. Statistical analyses were
conducted using GraphPad Prism 5 software. All values are presented as
means±s.e.m.; n refers to the sample size. P<0.05
was considered significant.
Author contributions
L.Z. co-designed the study, analysed the data, wrote the manuscript and together with
X.C. performed most of the experimentation; F.D. performed animal surgery; M.P.N.
performed some earlier experiments; A.D.S. helped with confocal and editing of the
manuscripts; M.M. performed the quantitative PCR assay and helped with
Immunohistochemistry; P.S. and A.O.G. performed the mass spectrometry proteomic
experiments and analysis; J.W. and R.-K.L. performed echocardiographic measurement
and analysis; J.M.P., J.H.B. and P.H.S. provided ideas, reagents and data exchanges
for the project; P.P.L. supervised and co-designed the study; L.Z., J.H.B. and
P.P.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the
manuscript.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Zhang, L. et al.
HACE1-dependent protein
degradation provides cardiac protection in response to haemodynamic stress. Nat.
Commun. 5:3430 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4430 (2014).
Authors: M A Sussman; S Welch; A Walker; R Klevitsky; T E Hewett; R L Price; E Schaefer; K Yager Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Alyaa A Kotby; Khaled H Taman; Heba Tallah A Sedky; Nevin M M Habeeb; Eman S El-Hadidi; Hanan S Yosseif Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Felix W Friedrich; Brendan R Wilding; Silke Reischmann; Claudia Crocini; Patrick Lang; Philippe Charron; Oliver J Müller; Meagan J McGrath; Ingra Vollert; Arne Hansen; Wolfgang A Linke; Christian Hengstenberg; Gisèle Bonne; Stellan Morner; Thomas Wichter; Hugo Madeira; Eloisa Arbustini; Thomas Eschenhagen; Christina A Mitchell; Richard Isnard; Lucie Carrier Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Jared R Tangney; Joyce S Chuang; Matthew S Janssen; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Peter Liao; Masahiko Hoshijima; Xin Wu; Gerald A Meininger; Mariappan Muthuchamy; Alice Zemljic-Harpf; Robert S Ross; Lawrence R Frank; Andrew D McCulloch; Jeffrey H Omens Journal: Biophys J Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Allen C T Teng; Tetsuaki Miyake; Shunichi Yokoe; Liyong Zhang; Luís Mário Rezende; Parveen Sharma; David H MacLennan; Peter P Liu; Anthony O Gramolini Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 11.205