Literature DB >> 24614791

Stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors.

N K Chan1, K G Abdullah, D Lubelski, M P Steinmetz, E C Benzel, J H Shin, T E Mroz.   

Abstract

Spinal metastases invariably affect the majority of patients with cancer. Many will develop symptoms related to pain and disability from epidural spinal cord compression as well as pathologic fracture of the vertebrae. With the emergence of targeted systemic therapies and a better understanding of cancer biology, patients are living longer with bony metastases. This poses particular challenges, as palliation of pain and maintenance of local tumor control are paramount to quality of life and overall functional independence for these patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a potent primary standalone and adjuvant treatment option for spinal metastases. To date, the primary indications for SRS include 1) upfront standalone treatment for painful bony metastases in the oligometastatic patient, 2) standalone or post-operative treatment following progression or recurrence of local disease despite previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), and 3) following surgery during which epidural disease is decompressed and the spine stabilized when indicated. SRS has demonstrated a significant advantage over cEBRT for tumors traditionally regarded as relatively radioresistant such as sarcoma, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer and colon carcinoma.9 The radiobiological advantage of increased tumoricidal dose delivery and spinal cord dose sparing in SRS have made this a powerful treatment alternative to cEBRT particularly within the context of re-irradiation. Given the limitations of spinal cord dose constraints, surgery is still the first-line therapy in patients with high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). Epidural compression can be treated with SRS, however this risks radiation-induced myelopathy and challenges the safety of effective dose delivery at the dural margin.11 With increasing dose, radiation-induced vertebral fracture is the most serious and prevalent side effect of SRS.53 An overview of SRS, including the most common indications, complications, and outcomes for spinal metastases are presented here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24614791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci        ISSN: 0390-5616            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

1.  The impact of histology and delivered dose on local control of spinal metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Yoshiya Yamada; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Ilya Laufer; Michael Lovelock; Ori Barzilai; Lily A McLaughlin; Zhigang Zhang; Adam M Schmitt; Daniel S Higginson; Eric Lis; Michael J Zelefsky; James Mechalakos; Mark H Bilsky
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Outcomes in the radiosurgical management of metastatic spine disease.

Authors:  Kevin D Kelley; Rona Racareanu; Cristina P Sison; Emile Gogineni; Zaker Rana; Shashank V Gandhi; Sussan Salas; Katherine Wagner; Ahmed Latefi; Maged M Ghaly
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09

3.  Influence of internal fixation systems on radiation therapy for spinal tumor.

Authors:  Jingfeng Li; Lei Yan; Jianping Wang; Lin Cai; Dongcai Hu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  Radiation therapy for oligometastatic bone disease in breast cancer.

Authors:  Norihisa Katayama; Kuniaki Katsui; Kenta Watanabe; Ryota Nagao; Kaho Otsuki; Takao Hiraki; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.