Literature DB >> 24613769

DIEP flap for breast reconstruction: retrospective evaluation of patient satisfaction on abdominal results.

J Niddam1, R Bosc2, F Lange2, H Chader2, B Hersant2, V Bigorie2, O Hermeziu2, J-P Meningaud2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although some papers have analyzed patient satisfaction after traditional abdominoplasty, studies that have specifically assessed patient satisfaction on abdominal reconstruction after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) surgery are lacking. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess satisfaction, specifically for abdominoplasty results, in patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a single DIEP flap.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 53 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap. The patients were all clinically evaluated during a specific consultation and answered a satisfaction survey based on a four-point scale (unsatisfied, satisfied, happy, and very happy).
RESULTS: A total of 50 patients responded to the survey. The average age was 52.3 years. This study revealed that 52% of the patients were happy or very happy with the aesthetic result of their abdomen. A total of 34% of the patients confessed that they preferred their abdomen before surgery. A further analysis of the dissatisfied patients showed particular dissatisfaction with dog-ears (50%), residual abdominal overhang (18%), or the horizontal scar (12%). The average distance between the horizontal scar and vulvar anterior commissure was 10.6 cm. A total of 86% of the patients were happy or very happy with the preoperative counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors note the necessity to give detailed preoperative information to explain the final abdominal aesthetic result, which can be quite different from the patient's expectations.
Copyright © 2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominoplasty; Breast reconstruction; DIEP flap; Satisfaction survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613769     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Factors influencing postoperative abdominal pain in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Ik Hyun Seong; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

2.  The use of plasmakinetic cautery compared to conventional electrocautery for dissection of abdominal free flap for breast reconstruction: single-centre, randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Whitney T H Chow; Georgette Oni; Venkat V Ramakrishnan; Mat Griffiths
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06

3.  A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicole Lindenblatt; Lisanne Gruenherz; Jian Farhadi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08

4.  DIEAP Flap Patients Equally as Satisfied with the Abdomen as Abdominoplasty Patients.

Authors:  Christoffer Aam Ingvaldsen; Tyge Tind Tindholdt; Kim Alexander Tønseth
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-08

5.  A Meta-analysis of Clinical, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost of DIEP versus Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria; Max Prokopenko; Max Greenfield; Oliver Smith; Andrea L Pusic; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-28

6.  The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: focus on donor site morbidity.

Authors:  Laura C Siegwart; Sebastian Fischer; Yannick F Diehm; Jörg M Heil; Christoph Hirche; Ulrich Kneser; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.239

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.