F Jerome Diskin1, Teresa Camp-Rogers2, Mary Ann Peberdy3, Joseph P Ornato3, Michael Christopher Kurz4. 1. School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX, United States. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: kurzmc@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of advanced life support (ALS) termination of resuscitation (TOR) guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) seeks to improve the efficiency of scarce pre-hospital resources. However, as pre-hospital treatment for OHCA evolves and survival improves, these TOR guidelines must be reevaluated in the contemporary context of emergency medical services (EMS) providing access to advanced resuscitation care. METHODS: Retrospective review of all adult (>18 years old), non-traumatic, OHCA patients (defined as patients with absence of pulse who received either CPR and/or defibrillation) treated by EMS in Richmond, VA, from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010. In addition to standard ALS, intra-arrest cold saline, mechanical CPR, and transportation to a comprehensive post-resuscitation center (CPRC) was provided. Patient treatment and outcomes were recorded via prehospital patient care reports and data were evaluated against previously established criteria for termination of resuscitation in an ALS EMS system. According to the aforementioned previously described criteria for TOR, patients meeting a single criterion for transport are recommended to be transported emergently to a comprehensive post-resuscitation care facility. Conversely, patients failing to meet any of the TOR criteria can be presumed to be expired without exception. Survival at 180 days was presumed when death could not be verified from publically reportable sources. RESULTS: Of the 322 OHCA patients enrolled, the majority were male (59%), unwitnessed (52%), received no bystander CPR (67%), and presented in a non-shockable initial rhythm (79%), with an average age of 62.5 years. Overall survival was 17%, 14%, 12%, and 11% at 7, 14, 30, and 180 days, respectively. Of the 75 patients for which TOR guidelines recommended termination, none survived yielding both 100% specificity (95% CI 100-92.8%) and positive predictive value (95% CI 100-94.1%). However, TOR guidelines recommended transport of 208 of the 283 patients who died within 30 days, resulting in a sensitivity of 26.5% (95% CI 34.5-23.4%). CONCLUSION: The TOR guidelines continue to have a reliable positive predictive value for death even in the setting of advanced EMS resuscitation methods and access to a CPRC. However, as the potential for survival from OHCA improves, the efficiency gained from their use is impacted greatly.
BACKGROUND: The development of advanced life support (ALS) termination of resuscitation (TOR) guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) seeks to improve the efficiency of scarce pre-hospital resources. However, as pre-hospital treatment for OHCA evolves and survival improves, these TOR guidelines must be reevaluated in the contemporary context of emergency medical services (EMS) providing access to advanced resuscitation care. METHODS: Retrospective review of all adult (>18 years old), non-traumatic, OHCA patients (defined as patients with absence of pulse who received either CPR and/or defibrillation) treated by EMS in Richmond, VA, from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010. In addition to standard ALS, intra-arrest cold saline, mechanical CPR, and transportation to a comprehensive post-resuscitation center (CPRC) was provided. Patient treatment and outcomes were recorded via prehospital patient care reports and data were evaluated against previously established criteria for termination of resuscitation in an ALS EMS system. According to the aforementioned previously described criteria for TOR, patients meeting a single criterion for transport are recommended to be transported emergently to a comprehensive post-resuscitation care facility. Conversely, patients failing to meet any of the TOR criteria can be presumed to be expired without exception. Survival at 180 days was presumed when death could not be verified from publically reportable sources. RESULTS: Of the 322 OHCA patients enrolled, the majority were male (59%), unwitnessed (52%), received no bystander CPR (67%), and presented in a non-shockable initial rhythm (79%), with an average age of 62.5 years. Overall survival was 17%, 14%, 12%, and 11% at 7, 14, 30, and 180 days, respectively. Of the 75 patients for which TOR guidelines recommended termination, none survived yielding both 100% specificity (95% CI 100-92.8%) and positive predictive value (95% CI 100-94.1%). However, TOR guidelines recommended transport of 208 of the 283 patients who died within 30 days, resulting in a sensitivity of 26.5% (95% CI 34.5-23.4%). CONCLUSION: The TOR guidelines continue to have a reliable positive predictive value for death even in the setting of advanced EMS resuscitation methods and access to a CPRC. However, as the potential for survival from OHCA improves, the efficiency gained from their use is impacted greatly.
Authors: Haewon Jung; Mi Jin Lee; Jae Wan Cho; Sang Hun Lee; Suk Hee Lee; You Ho Mun; Han-Sol Chung; Yang Hun Kim; Gyun Moo Kim; Sin-Youl Park; Jae Cheon Jeon; Changho Kim Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 2.953