Virag Dandekar1, Tiffany Morgan2, Julius Turian3, Mary Jo Fidler4, John Showel4, Thomas Nielsen5, Joy Coleman6, Aidnag Diaz3, David J Sher3. 1. Rush University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: virag_dandekar@rush.edu. 2. Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, United States. 3. Rush University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chicago, IL, United States. 4. Rush University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Chicago, IL, United States. 5. Rush University Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Chicago, IL, United States. 6. Advocate Condell Medical Center, Libertyville, IL, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is debate about the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) expansion and prophylactic nodal dose (PND) in head and neck IMRT. We evaluated our patterns-of-failure (POF) after helical tomotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to assess the oncologic safety of reducing the CTV, PND, and bilateral parotid sparing (BPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with curative intent CCRT between January 2007 and April 2013 at a single institution were included in this retrospective study. Locoregional recurrences (LRR) were overlaid on the treatment plan, and POF was determined relative to planned dose. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients treated with CCRT were evaluated, 74% of whom underwent BPS. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 29.3 months. The 3-year cumulative incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, progression-free and overall survival were 20%, 20%, 56% and 73% respectively. The local failures (n = 12) were either entirely contained within or centered on the original gross tumor volume (GTV), and all but 2 regional recurrences were in GTV. There were no nodal failures in the low-dose or peri-parotid neck (including ipsilateral neck). DISCUSSION: Nearly all LRR were located within the GTV suggesting that minimal-to-zero margin is required for CTV 70. The nodal recurrence pattern suggests the safety of routine bilateral parotid sparing and relatively low biologically equivalent dose (54 Gy in 33fx) to the low-risk neck.
OBJECTIVES: There is debate about the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) expansion and prophylactic nodal dose (PND) in head and neck IMRT. We evaluated our patterns-of-failure (POF) after helical tomotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to assess the oncologic safety of reducing the CTV, PND, and bilateral parotid sparing (BPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with curative intent CCRT between January 2007 and April 2013 at a single institution were included in this retrospective study. Locoregional recurrences (LRR) were overlaid on the treatment plan, and POF was determined relative to planned dose. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients treated with CCRT were evaluated, 74% of whom underwent BPS. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 29.3 months. The 3-year cumulative incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, progression-free and overall survival were 20%, 20%, 56% and 73% respectively. The local failures (n = 12) were either entirely contained within or centered on the original gross tumor volume (GTV), and all but 2 regional recurrences were in GTV. There were no nodal failures in the low-dose or peri-parotid neck (including ipsilateral neck). DISCUSSION: Nearly all LRR were located within the GTV suggesting that minimal-to-zero margin is required for CTV 70. The nodal recurrence pattern suggests the safety of routine bilateral parotid sparing and relatively low biologically equivalent dose (54 Gy in 33fx) to the low-risk neck.
Authors: Mischa de Ridder; Pieter D de Veij Mestdagh; Joris B W Elbers; Arash Navran; Charlotte L Zuur; Ludi E Smeele; Abrahim Al-Mamgani Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Adam R Burr; Paul M Harari; Huaising C Ko; Justine Y Bruce; Randall J Kimple; Matthew E Witek Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: M de Ridder; Z A R Gouw; J J Sonke; A Navran; B Jasperse; J Heukelom; M E T Tesselaar; W M C Klop; M W M van den Brekel; Abrahim Al-Mamgani Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Patrick D Maguire; Charles R Neal; Stuart M Hardy; Andrew M Schreiber Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jonathan E Leeman; Jin-Gao Li; Xin Pei; Praveen Venigalla; Zachary S Zumsteg; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Eitan Lupovitch; Sean M McBride; Chiaojung J Tsai; Jay O Boyle; Benjamin R Roman; Luc G T Morris; Lara A Dunn; Eric J Sherman; Nancy Y Lee; Nadeem Riaz Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777