Literature DB >> 24613499

Response shift recalibration and reprioritization in health-related quality of life was identified prospectively in older men with and without stroke.

Ruth Barclay1, Robert B Tate2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively consider evidence for response shift (RS) in health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older men who experienced stroke or remained stroke free. RS is a change in the meaning of self-evaluation; this includes recalibration, reprioritization, and reconceptualization. STUDY
DESIGN: A cohort of 3,983 male World War II Royal Canadian Air Force recruits has been followed since 1948. There were three prospectively determined groups: stroke survivors (n = 168; mean age, 80.1 years); older stroke-free group (n = 254; mean age, 82.8 years); and younger stroke-free group (n = 323; mean age, 74.7 years). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) was used to evaluate HRQL. Longitudinal structural equation models were developed using SF-36 subscales and three latent variables. Measurement invariance over two time points for each of the three groups was evaluated to identify RS.
RESULTS: All RS models had reasonable fit: stroke [root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), 0.069; 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.052, 0.086], older (RMSEA, 0.055; 90% CI: 0.041, 0.068), and younger (RMSEA, 0.062; 90% CI: 0.051, 0.074). Recalibration of physical function occurred in all three groups. Reprioritization of role limitations due to physical health happened in both stroke-free groups.
CONCLUSION: This study is unique in our ability to prospectively identify RS recalibration and reprioritization in HRQL in aging men with stroke and remaining free of stroke. Changes in the meaning of self-evaluation of HRQL occur not only with stroke but also in men who remain free of stroke.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community-dwelling older adults; Health-related quality of life; Men; Prospective study; Response shift; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613499     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  11 in total

1.  Curb Your Enthusiasm: Definitions, Adaptation, and Expectations for Quality of Life in ICU Survivorship.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Michael S Hurley; Ian M Oppenheim; Megan M Hosey; Ann M Parker
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-04

Review 2.  Patient-Perceived Outcomes and Quality of Life in ALS.

Authors:  Zachary Simmons
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Determinants of Health Status After Stroke: A Cohort Study with Repeated Measurements.

Authors:  Louise Pape Larsen; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Grethe Andersen; Niels Henrik Hjollund
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Patient-reported problematic symptoms in an ALS treatment trial.

Authors:  Divisha Raheja; Helen E Stephens; Erik Lehman; Susan Walsh; Chengwu Yang; Zachary Simmons
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.092

5.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of Persian diabetes self-management education in older adults with type 2 diabetes at a diabetes outpatient clinic in Tehran: a pilot randomized control trial.

Authors:  Arezoo Saghaee; Setareh Ghahari; Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani; Farshad Sharifi; Mahtab Alizadeh-Khoei; Mehdi Rezaee
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  Health-related quality of life in stroke patients questionnaire, short version (HRQOLISP-40): validation for its use in Colombia.

Authors:  Yahira Rossini Guzmán Sabogal; Jorge Pla Vidal; Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza; Felipe Ortuño Sánchez-Pedreño; María Catalina Gómez Guevara
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  Making healthcare decisions in a person's best interests when they lack capacity: clinical guidance based on a review of evidence.

Authors:  Derick T Wade; Celia Kitzinger
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Testing for response shift in treatment evaluation of change in self-reported psychopathology amongst secondary psychiatric care outpatients.

Authors:  Ingrid V E Carlier; Wessel A van Eeden; Kim de Jong; Erik J Giltay; Martijn S van Noorden; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Frans G Zitman; Henk Kelderman; Albert M van Hemert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples.

Authors:  Ruixuan Jiang; M F Bas Janssen; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Jae-Yung Kwon; Ruth Barclay; Cynthia Chauhan; Lori Frank; Wilbert B van den Hout; Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen; Sandra Nolte; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.