Literature DB >> 24613051

siRNA delivery from triblock copolymer micelles with spatially-ordered compartments of PEG shell, siRNA-loaded intermediate layer, and hydrophobic core.

Hyun Jin Kim1, Kanjiro Miyata2, Takahiro Nomoto3, Meng Zheng2, Ahram Kim3, Xueying Liu2, Horacio Cabral3, R James Christie2, Nobuhiro Nishiyama4, Kazunori Kataoka5.   

Abstract

Hydrophobized block copolymers have widely been developed for construction of polymeric micelles for stable delivery of nucleic acids as well as anticancer drugs. Herein, we elaborated an A-B-C type of triblock copolymer featuring shell-forming A-segment, nucleic acid-loading B-segment, and stable core-forming C-segment, directed toward construction of a three-layered polymeric micelle as a small interfering RNA (siRNA) vehicle. The triblock copolymer was prepared with nonionic and hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), cationic poly(l-lysine) (PLys), and poly{N-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl]aspartamide} [PAsp(DET)] bearing a hydrophobic dimethoxy nitrobenzyl ester (DN) moiety in the side chain [PEG-PLys-PAsp(DET-DN)]. The resulting triblock copolymers spontaneously formed sub-100 nm-sized polymeric micelles with a hydrophobic PAsp(DET-DN) core as well as PEG shell in an aqueous solution. This micelle was able to incorporate siRNA into the intermediate PLys layer, associated with slightly reduced size and a narrow size distribution. The triblock copolymer micelles (TCMs) stably encapsulated siRNA in serum-containing medium, whereas randomly hydrophobized triblock copolymer [PEG-PLys(DN)-PAsp(DET-DN)] control micelles (RCMs) gradually released siRNA with time and non-PEGylated diblock copolymer [PLys-PAsp(DET-DN)] control micelles (DCMs) immediately formed large aggregates. The TCMs thus induced appreciably stronger sequence-specific gene silencing in cultured cancer cells, compared to those control micelles. The siRNA delivery with TCMs was further examined in terms of cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking. The flow cytometric analysis revealed that the cellular uptake of TCMs was more efficient than that of RCMs, but less efficient than that of DCMs. The intracellular trafficking study using confocal laser scanning microscopy combined with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) revealed that the TCMs could readily release the siRNA payload within cells, which was in contrast to the DCMs exhibiting much slower release profile. This result indicates that PEG shell contributed to the smooth release of siRNA from TCMs within the cells, presumably due to avoiding irreversible aggregate formation. The obtained results demonstrated that the design of separately functionalized polymer segments expanded the performance of polymeric micelles for successful siRNA delivery.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrophobic interaction; Polyion complex micelle; Triblock copolymer; siRNA delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613051     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  10 in total

1.  Anionic Polymer and Quantum Dot Excipients to Facilitate siRNA Release and Self-Reporting of Disassembly in Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarrier Formulations.

Authors:  Chad T Greco; Jason C Andrechak; Thomas H Epps; Millicent O Sullivan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Efficient tuning of siRNA dose response by combining mixed polymer nanocarriers with simple kinetic modeling.

Authors:  Chad T Greco; Victoria G Muir; Thomas H Epps; Millicent O Sullivan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  RGD-decorated cholesterol stabilized polyplexes for targeted siRNA delivery to glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Bo Lou; Kate Connor; Kieron Sweeney; Ian S Miller; Alice O'Farrell; Eduardo Ruiz-Hernandez; David M Murray; Garry P Duffy; Alan Wolfe; Enrico Mastrobattista; Annette T Byrne; Wim E Hennink
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Tuning PEGylation of mixed micelles to overcome intracellular and systemic siRNA delivery barriers.

Authors:  Martina Miteva; Kellye C Kirkbride; Kameron V Kilchrist; Thomas A Werfel; Hongmei Li; Christopher E Nelson; Mukesh K Gupta; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Micelle-like nanoparticles as carriers for DNA and siRNA.

Authors:  Gemma Navarro; Jiayi Pan; Vladimir P Torchilin
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Codelivery of small molecule hedgehog inhibitor and miRNA for treating pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Virender Kumar; Goutam Mondal; Paige Slavik; Satyanarayna Rachagani; Surinder K Batra; Ram I Mahato
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Dual carrier-cargo hydrophobization and charge ratio optimization improve the systemic circulation and safety of zwitterionic nano-polyplexes.

Authors:  Meredith A Jackson; Sean K Bedingfield; Fang Yu; Mitchell E Stokan; Rachel E Miles; Elizabeth J Curvino; Ella N Hoogenboezem; Rachel H Bonami; Shrusti S Patel; Peggy L Kendall; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Synthesis and evaluation of cationic polymeric micelles as carriers of lumbrokinase for targeted thrombolysis.

Authors:  Yang Pan; Xiahui Wang; Zongning Yin
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 6.598

9.  Modulating Polymer-siRNA Binding Does Not Promote Polyplex-Mediated Silencing.

Authors:  R Chauncey Splichal; Joseph A Gredell; Erin B Vogel; Amanda Malefyt; Georgina Comiskey; Milton R Smith; Christina Chan; S Patrick Walton
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 10.  The Efficacy of Cholesterol-Based Carriers in Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Ngonidzashe Ruwizhi; Blessing Atim Aderibigbe
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.