Literature DB >> 24612994

Making sense of early false-belief understanding.

Katharina A Helming1, Brent Strickland2, Pierre Jacob3.   

Abstract

We address the puzzle about early belief ascription: young children fail elicited-response false-belief tasks, but they demonstrate spontaneous false-belief understanding. Based on recent converging evidence, we articulate a pragmatic framework to solve this puzzle. Young children do understand the contents of others' false belief, but they are overwhelmed when they must simultaneously make sense of two distinct actions: the instrumental action of a mistaken agent and the experimenter's communicative action.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612994     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  18 in total

1.  Two-and-a-half-year-olds succeed at a traditional false-belief task with reduced processing demands.

Authors:  Peipei Setoh; Rose M Scott; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Why are bilinguals better than monolinguals at false-belief tasks?

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernández
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Do complement clauses really support false-belief reasoning? A longitudinal study with English-speaking 2- to 3-year-olds.

Authors:  Ditte Boeg Thomsen; Anna Theakston; Birsu Kandemirci; Silke Brandt
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2021-08

4.  Epistemology for Beginners: Two- to Five-Year-Old Children's Representation of Falsity.

Authors:  Olivier Mascaro; Olivier Morin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Rethinking the Relationship between Social Experience and False-Belief Understanding: A Mentalistic Account.

Authors:  Erin Roby; Rose M Scott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-03

6.  Investigation of autistic traits through strategic decision-making in games with adaptive agents.

Authors:  Alexis B Craig; Emily Grossman; Jeffrey L Krichmar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Five-Year-Olds' Systematic Errors in Second-Order False Belief Tasks Are Due to First-Order Theory of Mind Strategy Selection: A Computational Modeling Study.

Authors:  Burcu Arslan; Niels A Taatgen; Rineke Verbrugge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-28

8.  Theory of mind: a new perspective on the puzzle of belief ascription.

Authors:  Gabriella Airenti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-14

9.  Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds' Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding.

Authors:  Rose M Scott; Erin Roby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Development of Theory of Mind and Positive and Negative Reciprocity in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Joanna Schug; Haruto Takagishi; Catalina Benech; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.