Literature DB >> 2461278

Cytological evidence of defective template in the fragile X chromosome.

B Kerem1, R Goitein, T Schaap.   

Abstract

In cells of fragile X patients, the changed X segment may appear as a poorly staining region or a gap, or as a deletion, involving one or both chromatids. To find out whether the fragile site represents an incompletely replicated DNA sequence, as has been suggested recently, we analyzed the four chromatids of methotrexate-induced endoreduplicated fragile X chromosomes. Our main observations were: (1) a deleted chromatid was never internal to a poorly staining one; (2) an endoreduplicated X chromosome with a fragile site never included a normal chromatid. These results can be explained by assuming that DNA at the fragile site, when replicated in the presence of methotrexate, may undergo defective replication and give rise to improperly packaged chromatin, appearing as a chromatid with a poorly staining region or a gap in the following metaphase. The same DNA may fail to function as a template in the following S-phase and give rise to a chromatid with a single-stranded segment, appearing as a deleted chromatid in the following metaphase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2461278     DOI: 10.1007/bf00331789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  28 in total

1.  Endomitotic reduplication mechanisms in ascites tumors of the mouse.

Authors:  A LEVAN; T S HAUSCHKA
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1953-08       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Fragile X syndrome: a unique mutation in man.

Authors:  R L Nussbaum; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Insights on diplochromosome structure and behaviour.

Authors:  V J Goyanes; J B Schvartzman
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Proliferation of PHA-stimulated lymphocytes measured by combined autoradiography sister chromatid differential staining.

Authors:  P E Crossen; W F Morgan
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Screening for fra(X)(q) in a population of mentally retarded males.

Authors:  U Froster-Iskenius; G Felsch; C Schirren; E Schwinger
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  High resolution banding and the locus of the Xq fragile site.

Authors:  R Brookwell; G Turner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  [Chromatid exchanges in human mitotic cells. BUDR Treatment and bichromatic fluorescence by aridine orange (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Dutrillauz; A M Fosse; M Prieur; J Lejeune
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes.

Authors:  T W Glover; C Berger; J Coyle; B Echo
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  On the nature of folic-acid-sensitive fragile sites in human chromosomes: an hypothesis.

Authors:  C L Krumdieck; P N Howard-Peebles
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-09

10.  Effects of nucleotides on expression of the folate sensitive fragile sites.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; E Baker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb
View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of recombination in the evolvement of the fragile X mutation.

Authors:  T Schaap
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.132

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.