Michele Shields1, Allison Kestenbaum2, Laura B Dunn1. 1. Spiritual Care Services Department,University of California San Francisco Medical Center and Benioff Children's Hospital,San Francisco,California. 2. Center for Pastoral Education,Jewish Theological Seminary, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Distinguishing the unique contributions and roles of chaplains as members of healthcare teams requires the fundamental step of articulating and critically evaluating conceptual models that guide practice. However, there is a paucity of well-described spiritual assessment models. Even fewer of the extant models prescribe interventions and describe desired outcomes corresponding to spiritual assessments. METHOD: This article describes the development, theoretical underpinnings, and key components of one model, called the Spiritual Assessment and Intervention Model (Spiritual AIM). Three cases are presented that illustrate Spiritual AIM in practice. Spiritual AIM was developed over the past 20 years to address the limitations of existing models. The model evolved based in part on observing how different people respond to a health crisis and what kinds of spiritual needs appear to emerge most prominently during a health crisis. RESULTS: Spiritual AIM provides a conceptual framework for the chaplain to diagnose an individual's primary unmet spiritual need, devise and implement a plan for addressing this need through embodiment/relationship, and articulate and evaluate the desired and actual outcome of the intervention. Spiritual AIM's multidisciplinary theory is consistent with the goals of professional chaplaincy training and practice, which emphasize the integration of theology, recognition of interpersonal dynamics, cultural humility and competence, ethics, and theories of human development. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Further conceptual and empirical work is needed to systematically refine, evaluate, and disseminate well-articulated spiritual assessment models such as Spiritual AIM. This foundational work is vital to advancing chaplaincy as a theoretically grounded and empirically rigorous healthcare profession.
OBJECTIVE: Distinguishing the unique contributions and roles of chaplains as members of healthcare teams requires the fundamental step of articulating and critically evaluating conceptual models that guide practice. However, there is a paucity of well-described spiritual assessment models. Even fewer of the extant models prescribe interventions and describe desired outcomes corresponding to spiritual assessments. METHOD: This article describes the development, theoretical underpinnings, and key components of one model, called the Spiritual Assessment and Intervention Model (Spiritual AIM). Three cases are presented that illustrate Spiritual AIM in practice. Spiritual AIM was developed over the past 20 years to address the limitations of existing models. The model evolved based in part on observing how different people respond to a health crisis and what kinds of spiritual needs appear to emerge most prominently during a health crisis. RESULTS: Spiritual AIM provides a conceptual framework for the chaplain to diagnose an individual's primary unmet spiritual need, devise and implement a plan for addressing this need through embodiment/relationship, and articulate and evaluate the desired and actual outcome of the intervention. Spiritual AIM's multidisciplinary theory is consistent with the goals of professional chaplaincy training and practice, which emphasize the integration of theology, recognition of interpersonal dynamics, cultural humility and competence, ethics, and theories of human development. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Further conceptual and empirical work is needed to systematically refine, evaluate, and disseminate well-articulated spiritual assessment models such as Spiritual AIM. This foundational work is vital to advancing chaplaincy as a theoretically grounded and empirically rigorous healthcare profession.
Authors: Allison Kestenbaum; Michele Shields; Jennifer James; Will Hocker; Stefana Morgan; Shweta Karve; Michael W Rabow; Laura B Dunn Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Saneta Maiko; Shelley A Johns; Paul R Helft; James E Slaven; Ann H Cottingham; Alexia M Torke Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Linda Emanuel; George Handzo; George Grant; Kevin Massey; Angelika Zollfrank; Diana Wilke; Richard Powell; Walter Smith; Kenneth Pargament Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Allison Kestenbaum; Jennifer James; Stefana Morgan; Michele Shields; Will Hocker; Michael Rabow; Laura B Dunn Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Fiona Timmins; Michael Connolly; Stefania Palmisano; Daniel Burgos; Lorenzo Mariano Juárez; Alessandro Gusman; Vicente Soriano; Marcin Jewdokimow; Wojciech Sadłoń; Aída López Serrano; David Conde Caballero; Sara Campagna; José María Vázquez García-Peñuela Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2022-05-05