Literature DB >> 24612656

Sexual function, relationship adjustment, and the relational impact of pain in male partners of women with provoked vulvar pain.

Kelly B Smith1, Caroline F Pukall.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the impact of provoked vulvar pain on women's sexuality and the partnered sexual context in which the pain typically occurs, partners have not been included widely in research. AIMS: To examine sexual and relationship functioning of male partners of women with provoked vulvar pain symptoms using a controlled design and to assess the impact of the pain on their relationship.
METHODS: Fifty male pain partners and 56 male controls completed questionnaires to assess sexual communication, sexual functioning/satisfaction, sexual esteem, relationship adjustment, and psychological health. Participants also completed numeric rating scales to assess the importance of sex to them and the extent to which they felt their relationship matched a satisfying relationship. To assess the relational impact of vulvar pain, pain partners were asked to indicate whether the pain had impacted their relationship, and, if yes, rated this impact. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale, the International Index of Erectile Function, the Sexuality Scale, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and numeric rating scales.
RESULTS: Pain partners reported significantly poorer sexual communication and erectile function and less sexual satisfaction compared with controls. They also reported significantly less affectional expression within their relationships and were more likely than controls to report a discrepancy between their relationship and their idea of a satisfying relationship. Almost 73% (n = 32/44) of pain partners reported a negative relational impact of vulvar pain. No significant differences in sexual desire, orgasmic function, sexual esteem, relationship satisfaction and consensus, psychological health, or importance of sex were found between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Provoked vulvar pain partners appear negatively impacted with regard to some sexual and physical aspects of their relationship. As one of the few controlled studies to investigate partner functioning in the context of provoked vulvar pain, this study has future research implications and supports the involvement of partners in treatment.
© 2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Dyspareunia; Pain; Partners; Provoked Vestibulodynia; Relationship Satisfaction; Sexual Function; Sexual Satisfaction; Vulvodynia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612656     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  6 in total

Review 1.  A psychosocial approach to female genital pain.

Authors:  Marieke Dewitte; Charmaine Borg; Lior Lowenstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Couples' Sexual Communication and Dimensions of Sexual Function: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Allen B Mallory; Amelia M Stanton; Ariel B Handy
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2019-02-19

3.  Understanding Women's Responses to Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting: An Integrative Psychological Pain Response Model.

Authors:  Jennifer Jo Connor; Sonya S Brady; Nicole Chaisson; Fatima Sharif Mohamed; Beatrice Bean E Robinson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-04-22

4.  What Do Patients Want? A Needs Assessment of Vulvodynia Patients Attending a Vulvar Diseases Clinic.

Authors:  Katherine LePage; Amanda Selk
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.491

5.  Decreased Sexual Desire among Middle-Aged and Old Women in China and Factors Influencing It: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Authors:  Ye Zhu; Xin Yang; Xiangling Fan; Yange Sun; Cheng Tan; Yanjie Wang; Wei Zhu; Dandan Ren
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 6.  Vulvodynia: a consideration of clinical and methodological research challenges and recommended solutions.

Authors:  Serena Corsini-Munt; Kate M Rancourt; Justin P Dubé; Meghan A Rossi; Natalie O Rosen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.