| Literature DB >> 24612643 |
Frédéric Habouzit1, Jérôme Hamelin, Gaëlle Santa-Catalina, Jean-P Steyer, Nicolas Bernet.
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of the nature of the support material on its colonization by a methanogenic consortium, four substrata made of different materials: polyvinyl chloride, 2 polyethylene and polypropylene were tested during the start-up of lab-scale fixed-film reactors. The reactor performances were evaluated and compared together with the analysis of the biofilms. Biofilm growth was quantified and the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities were characterized by molecular fingerprinting profiles (capillary electrophoresis-single strand conformation polymorphism). The composition of the inoculum was shown to have a major impact on the bacterial composition of the biofilm, whatever the nature of the support material or the organic loading rate applied to the reactors during the start-up period. In contrast, the biofilm archaeal populations were independent of the inoculum used but highly dependent on the support material. Supports favouring Archaea colonization, the limiting factor in the overall process, should be preferred.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24612643 PMCID: PMC3992021 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Quantitative parameters for the fixed-bed comparison
| C 1 | C 2 | C 3 | C 4 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period | PE | PP | Bf30 | PVC | PP | PVC | PE | Bf30 | Unit | |
| Adaptation | Duration | 28 | 33 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 11 | day |
| CODrem. Rate | 1.5 | 2.25 | 1.1 | 0.97 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 0.63 | 0.67 | gCODrem L−1 d−1 | |
| (VSS) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | g L−1 | |
| (VFA) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.75 | 0.1 | 0.1 | g L−1 | |
| Start-up | Duration | 35 | 55 | 11 | 34 | 31 | 31 | 19 | 13 | day |
| CODrem. Rate | 2.6 | 10 | 1.9 | 21.3 | 30 | 30 | 1.1 | 1 | gCODrem L−1 d−1 | |
| (VSS) | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.15 | g L−1 | |
| (VFA) | 0.2 | 0. | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | g L−1 | |
| Removal efficiency | 83 | 88 | 80 | 96 | 97 | 97 | 82 | 80 | % COD | |
Values measured at the end of each period.
Characterization of attached and suspended biomass at the end of the experiments
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | Unit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE | PP | Bf30 | PVC | PP | PVC | PE | Bf30 | ||
| Attached biomass | 18.39 | 78.37 | 9.97 | 98.38 | 169.9 | 176.2 | 4.31 | 6.71 | gVSS |
| Suspended biomass | 12.95 | 6.35 | 34.2 | 26.80 | 61.38 | 52.39 | 11.83 | 5.36 | gVSS |
| CODrem. rate | 2.60 | 10.00 | 1.90 | 21.26 | 30.00 | 30.00 | 1.14 | 1.02 | gCODrem L−1 d−1 |
| Biofilm production | 11.06 | 41.41 | 27.50 | 31.44 | 37.85 | 41.91 | 8.45 | 19.72 | gbiofilm kgCODrem−1 |
Figure 1Evolution over time of methane yield during experiments C1 (A: •, PE; ▴, PP; , Gompertz PE; , Gompertz PP), C2 (B: ▴, PVC; •, Bf30; , Gompertz PVC; , Gompertz Bf30), C3 (C: ▴, PVC bis; •, PP bis; , Gompertz PVC bis; , Gompertz PP bis) and C4 (D: ▴, PE bis; •, Bf30 bis; , Gompertz PE bis; , Gompertz Bf30 bis).
Gompertz parameters calculated to model YCH4 progress in the four experiments
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE | PP | Bf30 | PVC | PP | PVC | PE | Bf30 | |
| Maximum YCH4 | 0.335 | 0.322 | 0.315 | 0.308 | 0.298 | 0.331 | 0.233 | 0.225 |
| (LCH4 g CODrem−1) | ±0.010 | ±0.006 | ±0.034 | ±0.012 | ±0.006 | ±0.007 | ±0.011 | ±0.012 |
| Time for maximum YCH4 | 30 | 23 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 9 | ∞ | ∞ |
| (Days) | ||||||||
| MIR | 0.017 | 0.045 | 0.02 | 0.033 | 0.089 | 0.076 | 0.0322 | 0.026 |
| (LCH4 g CODrem−1) | ±0.002 | ±0.009 | ±0.003 | ±0.006 | ±0.022 | ±0.013 | ±0.002 | ±0.004 |
| λ | 11.4352 | 10.004 | 1.637 | 0.926 | 4.287 | 1.612 | 6.761 | 11.615 |
| (days) | ±1.1043 | ±0.846 | ±1.208 | ±0.849 | ±0.246 | ±0.362 | ±0.515 | ±0.5920 |
| R2 | 0.965 | 0.956 | 0.951 | 0.948 | 0.994 | 0.989 | 0.995 | 0.992 |
| (%) | ||||||||
MIR, maximum increase rate of the methane yield.
Lag-phase time.
Figure 2Principal component analysis ordination plot from archaeal (A) and bacterial (B) CE-SSCP profiles of adhered communities. The physical distances between points are proportional to the genetic distances of community profiles.
Sequences and target positions of the primers used in this study
| Primer | Direction | Sequence (5′–3′) | Targeted 16S rRNA |
|---|---|---|---|
| W274 | Forward Reverse | CCC TAC GGG GCG CAG CAG | |
| W275 | Reverse | 6-FAM-TTA CCG CGG CGG CTG | |
| W104 | Reverse | TTA CCG CGG CTG CTG GCA C | Universal |
| W49 | Forward | 6-FAM-AGG TCC AGA CTC CTA CGG G |