Francis Lovecchio1, Rebecca Farmer1, Jason Souza1, Nima Khavanin1, Gregory A Dumanian1, John Y S Kim2. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 2. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: jokim@nmh.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR), an increasingly common procedure, may have a greater impact on health care costs than is currently appreciated. Readmissions have the potential to further increase these costs and negatively impact patient outcomes. New national registry data allows for an in-depth look at the predictors and rates of readmission after VHR. METHODS: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients who underwent only an incisional or VHR in 2011. Patients who had any concomitant procedure were excluded. Using readmission as the dependent variable, a multivariate logistic regression model was created to identify independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS: VHR had a 4.9% 30-day readmission rate in 2011. Deep/incisional (12.6%) and superficial site infections (10.5%) were the most common wound complications seen in readmitted patients (both P < .001), whereas sepsis/septic shock (10.14%; P < .001) was the most common systemic complication. Higher class body mass index is not associated with readmission (P = .320). Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease function as predictors of readmission independently from their association with complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.6; and OR, 1.6, 95% CI, 1.1-2.3, respectively). Operative factors such as the use of mesh (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.995-1.7) or laparoscopy (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.96-1.6) do not increase likelihood of readmission. CONCLUSION: There is room for improvement in VHR readmission rates. Although complications are the main driver of readmission, surgeons must be aware of comorbidities that independently increase the odds of readmission, even when a complication does not occur.
BACKGROUND:Ventral hernia repair (VHR), an increasingly common procedure, may have a greater impact on health care costs than is currently appreciated. Readmissions have the potential to further increase these costs and negatively impact patient outcomes. New national registry data allows for an in-depth look at the predictors and rates of readmission after VHR. METHODS: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients who underwent only an incisional or VHR in 2011. Patients who had any concomitant procedure were excluded. Using readmission as the dependent variable, a multivariate logistic regression model was created to identify independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS: VHR had a 4.9% 30-day readmission rate in 2011. Deep/incisional (12.6%) and superficial site infections (10.5%) were the most common wound complications seen in readmitted patients (both P < .001), whereas sepsis/septic shock (10.14%; P < .001) was the most common systemic complication. Higher class body mass index is not associated with readmission (P = .320). Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease function as predictors of readmission independently from their association with complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.6; and OR, 1.6, 95% CI, 1.1-2.3, respectively). Operative factors such as the use of mesh (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.995-1.7) or laparoscopy (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.96-1.6) do not increase likelihood of readmission. CONCLUSION: There is room for improvement in VHR readmission rates. Although complications are the main driver of readmission, surgeons must be aware of comorbidities that independently increase the odds of readmission, even when a complication does not occur.
Authors: P A Baltodano; Y Webb-Vargas; K C Soares; C W Hicks; C M Cooney; P Cornell; K K Burce; T M Pawlik; F E Eckhauser Journal: Hernia Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Kathleen B Cartmell; Mary Dooley; Martina Mueller; Georges J Nahhas; Clara E Dismuke; Graham W Warren; Vince Talbot; K Michael Cummings Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Benedict Morath; Tanja Mayer; Alexander Francesco Josef Send; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Walter Emil Haefeli; Hanna Marita Seidling Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Anna C Beck; Paolo Goffredo; Imran Hassan; Sonia L Sugg; Geeta Lal; James R Howe; Ronald J Weigel Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Edward W Swanson; Hsu-Tang Cheng; Srinivas M Susarla; Denver M Lough; Anand R Kumar Journal: Plast Surg (Oakv) Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 0.947