BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is the standard treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events (CVEs). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is a risk factor for secondary CVEs in patients prescribed aspirin and/or clopidogrel. The present review and meta-analysis was aimed at assessing the ability of individual platelet-function tests to reliably identify patients at risk of developing secondary CVEs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies on platelet-reactivity measurements and CVEs. The main inclusion criteria were: (i) prospective study design; (ii) study medication, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel; and (iii) a platelet-function test being performed at baseline, before follow-up started. Of 3882 identified studies, 102 (2.6%; reporting on 44 098 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. With regard to high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR), 22 different tests were discussed in 55 studies (22 441 patients). Pooled analysis showed that HAPR was diagnosed in 22.2% of patients, and was associated with an increased CVE risk (relative risk [RR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-2.47). Eleven HAPR tests independently showed a significantly increased CVE risk in patients with HAPR as compared with those with normal on-aspirin platelet reactivity. As regards high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR), 59 studies (34 776 patients) discussed 15 different tests, and reported that HCPR was present in 40.4% of patients and was associated with an increased CVE risk (RR 2.80; 95% CI 2.40-3.27). Ten tests showed a significantly increased CVE risk. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HPR are suboptimally protected against future cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, not all of the numerous platelet tests proved to be able to identify patients at increased cardiovascular risk.
BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is the standard treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events (CVEs). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is a risk factor for secondary CVEs in patients prescribed aspirin and/or clopidogrel. The present review and meta-analysis was aimed at assessing the ability of individual platelet-function tests to reliably identify patients at risk of developing secondary CVEs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies on platelet-reactivity measurements and CVEs. The main inclusion criteria were: (i) prospective study design; (ii) study medication, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel; and (iii) a platelet-function test being performed at baseline, before follow-up started. Of 3882 identified studies, 102 (2.6%; reporting on 44 098 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. With regard to high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR), 22 different tests were discussed in 55 studies (22 441 patients). Pooled analysis showed that HAPR was diagnosed in 22.2% of patients, and was associated with an increased CVE risk (relative risk [RR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-2.47). Eleven HAPR tests independently showed a significantly increased CVE risk in patients with HAPR as compared with those with normal on-aspirin platelet reactivity. As regards high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR), 59 studies (34 776 patients) discussed 15 different tests, and reported that HCPR was present in 40.4% of patients and was associated with an increased CVE risk (RR 2.80; 95% CI 2.40-3.27). Ten tests showed a significantly increased CVE risk. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with HPR are suboptimally protected against future cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, not all of the numerous platelet tests proved to be able to identify patients at increased cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Tesse C Leunissen; Crystel M Gijsberts; Peter Paul Wisman; Albert Huisman; Maarten Ten Berg; Folkert W Asselbergs; Imo E Hoefer; Gerard Pasterkamp; Frans L Moll; Gert Jan de Borst; Mark Roest Journal: Int J Angiol Date: 2016-10-24
Authors: Peter Paul Wisman; Martin Teraa; Gert Jan de Borst; Marianne C Verhaar; Mark Roest; Frans L Moll Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Janine Dretzke; Joie Ensor; Sue Bayliss; James Hodgkinson; Marie Lordkipanidzé; Richard D Riley; David Fitzmaurice; David Moore Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2014-12-03
Authors: J W Zhang; W W Liu; Timothy A McCaffrey; X Q He; W Y Liang; X H Chen; X R Feng; Sidney W Fu; M L Liu Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Krzysztof Kukula; Mariusz Klopotowski; Joanna Was; Aleksandra Wrobel; Jacek Jamiolkowski; Artur Debski; Pawel Bekta; Zbigniew Chmielak; Adam Witkowski Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 1.426