Literature DB >> 24611643

Dogs (Canis familiaris) account for body orientation but not visual barriers when responding to pointing gestures.

Evan L MacLean1, Christopher Krupenye1, Brian Hare1.   

Abstract

In a series of four experiments we investigated whether dogs use information about a human's visual perspective when responding to pointing gestures. While there is evidence that dogs may know what humans can and cannot see, and that they flexibly use human communicative gestures, it is unknown if they can integrate these two skills. In Experiment 1 we first determined that dogs were capable of using basic information about a human's body orientation (indicative of her visual perspective) in a point following context. Subjects were familiarized with experimenters who either faced the dog and accurately indicated the location of hidden food, or faced away from the dog and (falsely) indicated the unbaited container. In test trials these cues were pitted against one another and dogs tended to follow the gesture from the individual who faced them while pointing. In Experiments 2-4 the experimenter pointed ambiguously toward two possible locations where food could be hidden. On test trials a visual barrier occluded the pointer's view of one container, while dogs could always see both containers. We predicted that if dogs could take the pointer's visual perspective they should search in the only container visible to the pointer. This hypothesis was supported only in Experiment 2. We conclude that while dogs are skilled both at following human gestures, and exploiting information about others' visual perspectives, they may not integrate these skills in the manner characteristic of human children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24611643      PMCID: PMC4138301          DOI: 10.1037/a0035742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  48 in total

1.  The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs.

Authors:  Márta Gácsi; Edina Kara; Bea Belényi; József Topál; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Comprehension and utilisation of pointing gestures and gazing in dog-human communication in relatively complex situations.

Authors:  Gabriella Lakatos; Márta Gácsi; József Topál; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food.

Authors:  Julia Riedel; David Buttelmann; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children.

Authors:  M Tomasello; J Call; A Gluckman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1997-12

5.  How dogs know when communication is intended for them.

Authors:  Juliane Kaminski; Linda Schulz; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-11-24

6.  Infants use shared experience to interpret pointing gestures.

Authors:  Kristin Liebal; Tanya Behne; Malinda Carpenter; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-03

7.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food.

Authors:  Monique A R Udell; Robson F Giglio; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Size and reversal learning in the beagle dog as a measure of executive function and inhibitory control in aging.

Authors:  P Dwight Tapp; Christina T Siwak; Jimena Estrada; Elizabeth Head; Bruce A Muggenburg; Carl W Cotman; Norton W Milgram
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Testing the social dog hypothesis: are dogs also more skilled than chimpanzees in non-communicative social tasks?

Authors:  Victoria Wobber; Brian Hare
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Vocabulary learning in a Yorkshire terrier: slow mapping of spoken words.

Authors:  Ulrike Griebel; D Kimbrough Oller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Citizen Science as a New Tool in Dog Cognition Research.

Authors:  Laughlin Stewart; Evan L MacLean; David Ivy; Vanessa Woods; Eliot Cohen; Kerri Rodriguez; Matthew McIntyre; Sayan Mukherjee; Josep Call; Juliane Kaminski; Ádám Miklósi; Richard W Wrangham; Brian Hare
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Is cognition the secret to working dog success?

Authors:  Brian Hare; Morgan Ferrans
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.084

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.