Literature DB >> 24610192

Shared decision making in the safety net: where do we go from here?

Angelique B Bouma1, Kristina Tiedje, Sara Poplau, Deborah H Boehm, Nilay D Shah, Matthew J Commers, Mark Linzer, Victor M Montori.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an interactive process between clinicians and patients in which both share information, deliberate together, and make clinical decisions. Clinics serving safety net patients face special challenges, including fewer resources and more challenging work environments. The use of SDM within safety net institutions has not been well studied.
METHODS: We recruited a convenience sample of 15 safety net primary care clinicians (13 physicians, 2 nurse practitioners). Each answered a 9-item SDM questionnaire and participated in a semistructured interview. From the transcribed interviews and questionnaire data, we identified themes and suggestions for introducing SDM into a safety net environment.
RESULTS: Clinicians reported only partially fulfilling the central components of SDM (sharing information, deliberating, and decision making). Most clinicians expressed interest in SDM by stating that they "selected a treatment option together" with patients (8 of 15 in strong or complete agreement), but only a minority (3 of 15) "thoroughly weighed the different treatment options" together with patients. Clinicians attributed this gap to many barriers, including time pressure, overwhelming visit content, patient preferences, and lack of available resources. All clinicians believed that lack of time made it difficult to practice SDM.
CONCLUSIONS: To increase use of SDM in the safety net, efficient SDM interventions designed for this environment, team care, and patient engagement in SDM will need further development. Future studies should focus on adapting SDM to safety net settings and determine whether SDM can reduce health care disparities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Preference; Safety Net Clinics; Shared Decision Making

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24610192     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  4 in total

1.  Elucidating patient-perceived role in "decision-making" among African Americans receiving lung cancer care through a county safety-net system.

Authors:  Simon Craddock Lee; Emily G Marks; Joanne M Sanders; Deborah J Wiebe
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Stephen K Williams; Melanie Applegate; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Ronald S Braithwaite
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Health perceptions and symptom burden in primary care: measuring health using audio computer-assisted self-interviews.

Authors:  Keiki Hinami; Jennifer Smith; Catherine D Deamant; Romina Kee; Diana Garcia; William E Trick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The importance of patient engagement to quality of breast cancer care and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study among Latina breast cancer survivors in rural and urban communities.

Authors:  Jackie Bonilla; Cristian Escalera; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Cathy Samayoa; Carmen Ortiz; Anita L Stewart; Anna María Nápoles
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.