Stephen Babb1, Carrie McNeil2, Judy Kruger1, Michael A Tynan1. 1. Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Global Environmental Health Department, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is no safe level of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Most US casinos continue to allow smoking, thus exposing workers and patrons to the hazards of SHS. This paper reviews the scientific literature on air quality, SHS exposure, health effects and economic outcomes related to SHS and smoking restrictions in casinos, as well as on smoking prevalence among casino patrons and problem gamblers. DATA SOURCES: Peer reviewed studies published from January 1998 to March 2011. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence from air quality, biomarker and survey studies indicates that smoking in casinos is a significant public health problem. Workers and patrons in casinos that allow smoking are exposed to high levels of SHS, as documented by elevated levels of SHS constituents in the air of casinos and by elevated levels of tobacco-specific biomarkers in non-smokers' blood, urine and saliva. Partial smoking restrictions in casinos do not effectively protect non-smokers from SHS. Findings suggest that the smoking prevalence of casino patrons is comparable with that of the general public, although this prevalence may be higher among problem gamblers. Few studies have examined the economic impact of smoke-free policies in casinos, and the results of these studies are mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Employees and patrons are exposed to SHS in casinos, posing a significant, preventable risk to their health. Policies completely prohibiting smoking in casinos would be expected to greatly reduce or eliminate SHS exposure in casinos, thereby protecting the health of casino workers and patrons. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: There is no safe level of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Most US casinos continue to allow smoking, thus exposing workers and patrons to the hazards of SHS. This paper reviews the scientific literature on air quality, SHS exposure, health effects and economic outcomes related to SHS and smoking restrictions in casinos, as well as on smoking prevalence among casino patrons and problem gamblers. DATA SOURCES: Peer reviewed studies published from January 1998 to March 2011. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence from air quality, biomarker and survey studies indicates that smoking in casinos is a significant public health problem. Workers and patrons in casinos that allow smoking are exposed to high levels of SHS, as documented by elevated levels of SHS constituents in the air of casinos and by elevated levels of tobacco-specific biomarkers in non-smokers' blood, urine and saliva. Partial smoking restrictions in casinos do not effectively protect non-smokers from SHS. Findings suggest that the smoking prevalence of casino patrons is comparable with that of the general public, although this prevalence may be higher among problem gamblers. Few studies have examined the economic impact of smoke-free policies in casinos, and the results of these studies are mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Employees and patrons are exposed to SHS in casinos, posing a significant, preventable risk to their health. Policies completely prohibiting smoking in casinos would be expected to greatly reduce or eliminate SHS exposure in casinos, thereby protecting the health of casino workers and patrons. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cotinine; Public policy; Secondhand smoke
Authors: Michael A Tynan; Teresa W Wang; Kristy L Marynak; Pamela Lemos; Stephen D Babb Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Jennifer B Unger; Frank J Chaloupka; Donna Vallone; James F Thrasher; Destiney S Nettles; Tabitha P Hendershot; Gary E Swan Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Stephen Babb; Benmei Liu; Brandon Kenemer; Carissa Baker Holmes; Anne M Hartman; James T Gibson; Brian A King Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Fernando Diaz Del Valle; Jonathan K Zakrajsek; Sung-Joon Min; Patricia B Koff; Harold W Bell; Keegan A Kincaid; Daniel N Frank; Vijay Ramakrishnan; Moumita Ghosh; R William Vandivier Journal: Chest Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 10.262
Authors: Neil E Klepeis; Narinder Dhaliwal; Gary Hayward; Viviana Acevedo-Bolton; Wayne R Ott; Nathan Read; Steve Layton; Ruoting Jiang; Kai-Chung Cheng; Lynn M Hildemann; James L Repace; Stephanie Taylor; Seow-Ling Ong; Francisco O Buchting; Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 3.390