PURPOSE: To report feasibility and reliability of a semi-automated image analysis method for retinal vessel diameter measurements in subjects with papilledema before and after treatment. METHODS: Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) was performed in seven normal, five pseudopapilledema, and seven papilledema subjects. In four papilledema subjects, SLO was performed both before and following treatment. Two observers measured diameters of superior and inferior retinal arteries and veins from SLO images using two methods: manual analysis and semi-automated customized analysis. Vessel measurements were compared between observers and between image analysis methods. Retinal vein and artery diameters for each subject were compared between papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and normal subjects, and before and following treatment for papilledema subjects. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was 0.97 (Pearson's correlation, r) and 0.90 for semi-automated and manual measurements, respectively. Correlation coefficient of manual and semi-automated measurements was 0.85. Retinal vein diameter in papilledema subjects was larger than in pseudopapilledema and normal subjects (P = 0.03, 0.04, Mann-Whitney). Papilledema subjects had a decrease in retinal vein diameter following treatment for and resolution of papilledema (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed rank). Retinal artery diameters were not significantly different between papilledema and pseudopapilledema or normal groups, and did not significantly change following papilledema treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A feasible and reliable semi-automated image analysis method for measurement of retinal artery and vein diameters from SLO images of elevated optic nerves is reported. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of retinal vein diameter measurements as a marker for diagnosis and treatment of papilledema.
PURPOSE: To report feasibility and reliability of a semi-automated image analysis method for retinal vessel diameter measurements in subjects with papilledema before and after treatment. METHODS: Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) was performed in seven normal, five pseudopapilledema, and seven papilledema subjects. In four papilledema subjects, SLO was performed both before and following treatment. Two observers measured diameters of superior and inferior retinal arteries and veins from SLO images using two methods: manual analysis and semi-automated customized analysis. Vessel measurements were compared between observers and between image analysis methods. Retinal vein and artery diameters for each subject were compared between papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and normal subjects, and before and following treatment for papilledema subjects. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was 0.97 (Pearson's correlation, r) and 0.90 for semi-automated and manual measurements, respectively. Correlation coefficient of manual and semi-automated measurements was 0.85. Retinal vein diameter in papilledema subjects was larger than in pseudopapilledema and normal subjects (P = 0.03, 0.04, Mann-Whitney). Papilledema subjects had a decrease in retinal vein diameter following treatment for and resolution of papilledema (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed rank). Retinal artery diameters were not significantly different between papilledema and pseudopapilledema or normal groups, and did not significantly change following papilledema treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A feasible and reliable semi-automated image analysis method for measurement of retinal artery and vein diameters from SLO images of elevated optic nerves is reported. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of retinal vein diameter measurements as a marker for diagnosis and treatment of papilledema.
Authors: L D Hubbard; R J Brothers; W N King; L X Clegg; R Klein; L S Cooper; A R Sharrett; M D Davis; J Cai Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: M Haan; M A Espeland; B E Klein; R Casanova; S A Gaussoin; R D Jackson; A E Millen; S M Resnick; J E Rossouw; S A Shumaker; R Wallace; K Yaffe Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Harry Leung; Jie Jin Wang; Elena Rochtchina; Ava G Tan; Tien Y Wong; Ronald Klein; Larry D Hubbard; Paul Mitchell Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: William S Fischer; Michael Wall; Michael P McDermott; Mark J Kupersmith; Steven E Feldon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Karel Van Keer; Jan Van Keer; João Barbosa Breda; Vahid Nassiri; Cathy De Deyne; Cornelia Genbrugge; Luís Abegão Pinto; Ingeborg Stalmans; Evelien Vandewalle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mahnaz Shahidi; Anthony E Felder; Ou Tan; Norman P Blair; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Selin L Auvazian; Jennifer Cano; Sophie Leahy; Preny Karamian; Amir Kashani; Andrew Moshfeghi; Hossein Ameri; Norman P Blair; Mahnaz Shahidi Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Norman P Blair; Justin Wanek; Anthony E Felder; Charlotte E Joslin; Jacob K Kresovich; Jennifer I Lim; Felix Y Chau; Yannek Leiderman; Mahnaz Shahidi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799