Literature DB >> 24608298

Does reevaluation of colorectal cancers with inadequate nodal yield lead to stage migration or the identification of metastatic lymph nodes?

Lilian Chen1, Matthew F Kalady, John Goldblum, Dilara Seyidova-Khoshknabi, Eric J Burks, Patricia L Roberts, Rocco Ricciardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends routine reevaluation of all stage II colon cancer specimens with fewer than 12 lymph nodes. However, there are few data demonstrating the effect of reevaluation on stage.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effect of pathologic reevaluation for colorectal cancers with fewer than 12 lymph nodes on stage.
DESIGN: This study entailed a retrospective review of pathology reports. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 2 large multispecialty referral centers.
INTERVENTIONS: Pathologic reevaluation was performed to look for additional lymph nodes. PATIENTS: All patients with stage I through III colorectal cancers with inadequate lymph node yields who underwent reevaluation from January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2011 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We recorded initial pathologic stage and new stage following reevaluation. The following variables before and after reevaluation were also recorded: 1) total lymph node count, 2) metastatic node count, 3) negative node count, and 4) lymph node ratio.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent pathologic reevaluation from a total of 1682 cancer specimens. Mean nodal yields were 7.2 ± 2.6 on the first pathologic review. On reevaluation, 80% of patients had one or more newly identified nodes. On average, 6.9 ± 9.6 more lymph nodes were identified with a metastatic node detected in 4 of 83 patients (4.8%). After pathologic reevaluation, 1 patient (1.2%) had a change in TNM stage from N1 to N2 disease. The lymph node ratio changed in 13 of 15 patients (87% of stage III cancers). Only 4 of these had a change in lymph node quartile. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective nature and small sample size.
CONCLUSION: Few patients have a newly discovered metastatic node or stage change following pathologic reevaluation. The effect of pathologic reevaluation on treatment and outcome should be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24608298     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  3 in total

1.  A Nomogram to Predict Adequate Lymph Node Recovery before Resection of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Cong Li; Wei Gao; Xiao-Wei Yin; Qi-Feng Luo; Nan Liu; Shiva Basnet; Zhen-Ling Dai; Hai-Yan Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Modified Tumor-Node-Metastasis Classification for Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chundong Zhang; Zubing Mei; Junpeng Pei; Masanobu Abe; Xiantao Zeng; Qiao Huang; Kazuhiro Nishiyama; Naohiko Akimoto; Koichiro Haruki; Hongmei Nan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Rui Zhang; Xinxiang Li; Shuji Ogino; Tomotaka Ugai
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-10-16

3.  Fat clearance and conventional fixation identified ypN0 rectal cancers following intermediate neoadjuvant radiotherapy have similar long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Nan Chen; Ting-Ting Sun; Zhong-Wu Li; Yun-Feng Yao; Lin Wang; Ai-Wen Wu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.