Literature DB >> 24607801

Immediate therapeutic effect of interferential current therapy on spasticity, balance, and gait function in chronic stroke patients: a randomized control trial.

Hye Rim Suh1, Hee Chul Han1, Hwi-Young Cho2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a single trial of interferential current therapy (ICT) can immediately alleviate spasticity and improve balance and gait performance in patients with chronic stroke.
DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation in a local center.
SUBJECTS: A total of 42 adult patients with chronic stroke with plantar flexor spasticity of the lower limb. INTERVENTION: The ICT group received a single 60-minute ICT stimulation of the gastrocnemius in conjunction with air-pump massage. In the placebo-ICT group, electrodes were placed and air-pump massage performed without electrical stimulation. MAIN MEASURES: After a single ICT application, spasticity was measured immediately using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and balance and functional gait performance were assessed using the following clinical tools: Functional Reach Test (FRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and 10-m Walk Test (10MWT).
RESULTS: Gastrocnemius spasticity significantly decreased in the ICT group than in the placebo-ICT group (MAS: ICT vs placebo-ICT: 1.55±0.76 vs 0.40±0.50). The ICT group showed significantly greater improvement in balance and gait abilities than the placebo-ICT group (FRT: 2.62±1.21 vs 0.61±1.34, BBS: 1.75±1.52 vs 0.40±0.88, TUG: 6.07±6.11 vs 1.68±2.39, 10MWT: 7.02±7.02 vs 1.96±3.13). Spasticity correlated significantly with balance and gait abilities (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: A single trial of ICT is a useful intervention for immediately improving spasticity, balance, and gait abilities in chronic stroke patients, but not for long-term effects. Further study on the effects of repeated ICT is needed.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; balance; gait; interferential current therapy (ICT); spasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24607801     DOI: 10.1177/0269215514523798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of kinematic variables obtained by inertial sensors among stroke survivors and healthy older adults in the Functional Reach Test: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  José Antonio Merchán-Baeza; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Determination of effective treatment duration of interferential current therapy using electromyography.

Authors:  Jong-In Youn; Ho Sub Lee; Sangkwan Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 3.  Neuromodulation via Interferential Electrical Stimulation as a Novel Therapy in Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders.

Authors:  Judith S Moore; Peter R Gibson; Rebecca E Burgell
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

4.  The effects of abdominal interferential current therapy on waist circumference and visceral fat distance in obese women.

Authors:  Young-Han Park; Jung-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-09-15

5.  Effectiveness of Somatosensory Stimulation for the Lower Limb and Foot to Improve Balance and Gait after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison M Aries; Poppy Downing; Julius Sim; Susan M Hunter
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.