Literature DB >> 24607741

Distinguishing between mechanisms of cell aggregation using pair-correlation functions.

D J G Agnew1, J E F Green1, T M Brown1, M J Simpson2, B J Binder3.   

Abstract

Many cell types form clumps or aggregates when cultured in vitro through a variety of mechanisms including rapid cell proliferation, chemotaxis, or direct cell-to-cell contact. In this paper we develop an agent-based model to explore the formation of aggregates in cultures where cells are initially distributed uniformly, at random, on a two-dimensional substrate. Our model includes unbiased random cell motion, together with two mechanisms which can produce cell aggregates: (i) rapid cell proliferation and (ii) a biased cell motility mechanism where cells can sense other cells within a finite range, and will tend to move towards areas with higher numbers of cells. We then introduce a pair-correlation function which allows us to quantify aspects of the spatial patterns produced by our agent-based model. In particular, these pair-correlation functions are able to detect differences between domains populated uniformly at random (i.e. at the exclusion complete spatial randomness (ECSR) state) and those where the proliferation and biased motion rules have been employed - even when such differences are not obvious to the naked eye. The pair-correlation function can also detect the emergence of a characteristic inter-aggregate distance which occurs when the biased motion mechanism is dominant, and is not observed when cell proliferation is the main mechanism of aggregate formation. This suggests that applying the pair-correlation function to experimental images of cell aggregates may provide information about the mechanism associated with observed aggregates. As a proof of concept, we perform such analysis for images of cancer cell aggregates, which are known to be associated with rapid proliferation. The results of our analysis are consistent with the predictions of the proliferation-based simulations, which supports the potential usefulness of pair correlation functions for providing insight into the mechanisms of aggregate formation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agent-based model; Cell proliferation; Cell–cell interaction; Spatial patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24607741     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  14 in total

1.  Quantifying trophoblast migration: In vitro approaches to address in vivo situations.

Authors:  Joanna James; Win Tun; Alys Clark
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Spatial moment dynamics for collective cell movement incorporating a neighbour-dependent directional bias.

Authors:  Rachelle N Binny; Michael J Plank; Alex James
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Identifying the necrotic zone boundary in tumour spheroids with pair-correlation functions.

Authors:  S Dini; B J Binder; S C Fischer; C Mattheyer; A Schmitz; E H K Stelzer; N G Bean; J E F Green
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Quantifying the dominant growth mechanisms of dimorphic yeast using a lattice-based model.

Authors:  Hayden Tronnolone; Jennifer M Gardner; Joanna F Sundstrom; Vladimir Jiranek; Stephen G Oliver; Benjamin J Binder
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Growth kinetics and power laws indicate distinct mechanisms of cell-cell interactions in the aggregation process.

Authors:  Debangana Mukhopadhyay; Rumi De
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Detection and characterization of chemotaxis without cell tracking.

Authors:  Jack D Hywood; Gregory Rice; Sophie V Pageon; Mark N Read; Maté Biro
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Spectral analysis of pair-correlation bandwidth: application to cell biology images.

Authors:  Benjamin J Binder; Matthew J Simpson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Quantifying two-dimensional filamentous and invasive growth spatial patterns in yeast colonies.

Authors:  Benjamin J Binder; Joanna F Sundstrom; Jennifer M Gardner; Vladimir Jiranek; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Assessing the role of spatial correlations during collective cell spreading.

Authors:  Katrina K Treloar; Matthew J Simpson; Benjamin J Binder; D L Sean McElwain; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Challenges and Opportunities in the Statistical Analysis of Multiplex Immunofluorescence Data.

Authors:  Christopher M Wilson; Oscar E Ospina; Mary K Townsend; Jonathan Nguyen; Carlos Moran Segura; Joellen M Schildkraut; Shelley S Tworoger; Lauren C Peres; Brooke L Fridley
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.