Literature DB >> 24607006

Investigation of different cage designs and mechano-regulation algorithms in the lumbar interbody fusion process - a finite element analysis.

Sergio Postigo1, Hendrik Schmidt2, Antonius Rohlmann2, Michael Putzier3, Antonio Simón4, Georg Duda2, Sara Checa2.   

Abstract

Lumbar interbody fusion cages are commonly used to treat painful spinal degeneration and instability by achieving bony fusion. Many different cage designs exist, however the effect of cage morphology and material properties on the fusion process remains largely unknown. This finite element model study aims to investigate the influence of different cage designs on bone fusion using two mechano-regulation algorithms of tissue formation. It could be observed that different cages play a distinct key role in the mechanical conditions within the fusion region and therefore regulate the time course of the fusion process.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cage designs; Finite element method; Lumbar spinal fusion; Mechano-differentiation model

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24607006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Long-term effects of placing one or two cages in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mingzheng Zhang; Fang Pu; Liqiang Xu; Linlin Zhang; Jie Yao; Deyu Li; Yu Wang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Grade I Versus Grade II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Gregory D Lopez; Grant D Shifflett; Bryce A Basques; Philip K Louie; Daniel D Bohl; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  A UK-based pilot study of current surgical practice and implant preferences in lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Elena Provaggi; Claudio Capelli; Julian J H Leong; Deepak M Kalaskar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  PCL strut-like scaffolds appear superior to gyroid in terms of bone regeneration within a long bone large defect: An in silico study.

Authors:  Mahdi Jaber; Patrina S P Poh; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration - an in silico analysis.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-06-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.