Literature DB >> 24606277

The effects of rhythm and melody on auditory stream segregation.

Orsolya Szalárdy1, Alexandra Bendixen2, Tamás M Böhm1, Lucy A Davies3, Susan L Denham3, István Winkler1.   

Abstract

While many studies have assessed the efficacy of similarity-based cues for auditory stream segregation, much less is known about whether and how the larger-scale structure of sound sequences support stream formation and the choice of sound organization. Two experiments investigated the effects of musical melody and rhythm on the segregation of two interleaved tone sequences. The two sets of tones fully overlapped in pitch range but differed from each other in interaural time and intensity. Unbeknownst to the listener, separately, each of the interleaved sequences was created from the notes of a different song. In different experimental conditions, the notes and/or their timing could either follow those of the songs or they could be scrambled or, in case of timing, set to be isochronous. Listeners were asked to continuously report whether they heard a single coherent sequence (integrated) or two concurrent streams (segregated). Although temporal overlap between tones from the two streams proved to be the strongest cue for stream segregation, significant effects of tonality and familiarity with the songs were also observed. These results suggest that the regular temporal patterns are utilized as cues in auditory stream segregation and that long-term memory is involved in this process.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606277     DOI: 10.1121/1.4865196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Auditory streaming of tones of uncertain frequency, level, and duration.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert A Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Schema learning for the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Kevin J P Woods; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  EEG signatures accompanying auditory figure-ground segregation.

Authors:  Brigitta Tóth; Zsuzsanna Kocsis; Gábor P Háden; Ágnes Szerafin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; István Winkler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  A Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Auditory Streaming and Its Relation to Auditory Masking.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert Lutfi; Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 6.  Computational Models of Auditory Scene Analysis: A Review.

Authors:  Beáta T Szabó; Susan L Denham; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Do audio-visual motion cues promote segregation of auditory streams?

Authors:  Lidia Shestopalova; Tamás M Bőhm; Alexandra Bendixen; Andreas G Andreou; Julius Georgiou; Guillaume Garreau; Botond Hajdu; Susan L Denham; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.