Literature DB >> 24605839

Radiosurgery for low-grade intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Dale Ding1, Chun-Po Yen, Zhiyuan Xu, Robert M Starke, Jason P Sheehan.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Low-grade, or Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grades I and II, arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are associated with lower surgical morbidity rates than higher-grade lesions. While radiosurgery is now widely accepted as an effective treatment approach for AVMs, the risks and benefits of the procedure for low-grade AVMs, as compared with microsurgery, remain poorly understood. The authors of this study present the outcomes for a large cohort of low-grade AVMs treated with radiosurgery.
METHODS: From an institutional radiosurgery database comprising approximately 1450 AVM cases, all patients with SM Grade I and II lesions were identified. Patients with less than 2 years of radiological follow-up, except those with complete AVM obliteration, were excluded from analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards and logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with obliteration, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and hemorrhage following radiosurgery.
RESULTS: Five hundred two patients harboring low-grade AVMs were eligible for analysis. The median age was 35 years, 50% of patients were male, and the most common presentation was hemorrhage (47%). The median AVM volume and prescription dose were 2.4 cm(3) and 23 Gy, respectively. The median radiological and clinical follow-up intervals were 48 and 62 months, respectively. The cumulative obliteration rate was 76%. The median time to obliteration was 40 months, and the actuarial obliteration rates were 66% and 80% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Independent predictors of obliteration were no preradiosurgery embolization (p < 0.001), decreased AVM volume (p = 0.005), single draining vein (p = 0.013), lower radiosurgery-based AVM scale score (p = 0.016), and lower Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale (Virginia RAS) score (p = 0.001). The annual postradiosurgery hemorrhage rate was 1.4% with increased AVM volume (p = 0.034) and lower prescription dose (p = 0.006) as independent predictors. Symptomatic and permanent RICs were observed in 8.2% and 1.4% of patients, respectively. No preradiosurgery hemorrhage (p = 0.011), a decreased prescription dose (p = 0.038), and a higher Virginia RAS score (p = 0.001) were independently associated with postradiosurgery RICs.
CONCLUSIONS: Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II AVMs are very amenable to successful treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery. While patient, physician, and institutional preferences frequently dictate the final course of treatment, radiosurgery offers a favorable risk-to-benefit profile for the management of low-grade AVMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVM = arteriovenous malformation; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; Gamma Knife; RBAS = radiosurgery-based AVM scale; RIC = radiation-induced change; SM = Spetzler-Martin; Virginia RAS = Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale; intracranial arteriovenous malformation; low Spetzler-Martin grade; stereotactic radiosurgery; stroke; vascular disorders; vascular malformation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24605839     DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  15 in total

Review 1.  The biology of radiosurgery and its clinical applications for brain tumors.

Authors:  Douglas Kondziolka; Samuel M Shin; Andrew Brunswick; Irene Kim; Joshua S Silverman
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Surgical Approaches for Symptomatic Cerebral Cavernous Malformations of the Thalamus and Brainstem.

Authors:  Dale Ding; Robert M Starke; R Webster Crowley; Kenneth C Liu
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2017-03-31

3.  Acute management of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Andreas Hartmann; J P Mohr
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  Modern radiosurgical and endovascular classification schemes for brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Endovascular Treatment for Low-Grade (Spetzler-Martin I-II) Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  H Baharvahdat; R Blanc; R Fahed; S Smajda; G Ciccio; J-P Desilles; H Redjem; S Escalard; M Mazighi; D Chauvet; T Robert; P Sasannejad; M Piotin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Current surgical results with low-grade brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Matthew B Potts; Darryl Lau; Adib A Abla; Helen Kim; William L Young; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Spatiotemporal Fractionation Schemes for Irradiating Large Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Marc R Bussière; Paul H Chapman; Jay S Loeffler; Helen A Shih
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Diagnosis and evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Andrew Conger; Charles Kulwin; Michael T Lawton; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-12

9.  Using a Machine Learning Approach to Predict Outcomes after Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Eric Karl Oermann; Alex Rubinsteyn; Dale Ding; Justin Mascitelli; Robert M Starke; Joshua B Bederson; Hideyuki Kano; L Dade Lunsford; Jason P Sheehan; Jeffrey Hammerbacher; Douglas Kondziolka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Predictive Factors of Radiation-Induced Changes Following Single-Session Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Myung Ji Kim; Kyung Won Chang; So Hee Park; Won Seok Chang; Jong Hee Chang; Jin Woo Chang; Hyun Ho Jung
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.