Literature DB >> 24604997

A study on provisional cements, cementation techniques, and their effects on bonding of porcelain laminate veneers.

G Vinod Kumar1, T Soorya Poduval2, P Shesha Reddy3.   

Abstract

Minimal tooth preparation is required for porcelain laminate veneers, but interim restorations are a must to protect their teeth against thermal insult, chemical irritation, and to provide aesthetics. Cement remaining after the removal of the provisional restoration can impair the etching quality of the tooth surface and fit and final bonding of the porcelain laminate veneer. This in vitro study examined the tooth surface for remaining debris of cement after removal of a provisional restoration. Determine the presence of cement debris on prepared tooth surface subsequent to the removal of provisional restoration. Determine the cement with the least residue following the cleansing procedures. Determine the effect of smear layer on the amount of residual luting cement. Eighty-four extracted natural anterior teeth were prepared for porcelain laminate veneers. For half of the teeth, the smear layer was removed before luting provisional restorations. Veneer provisional restorations were fabricated and luted to teeth with six bonding methods: varnish combined with glass ionomer cement (GIC), varnish combined with resin modified GIC, varnish, spot etching combined with dual-cure luting cement, adhesive combined with GIC, adhesive combined with resin modified GIC, and adhesive, spot etching combined with dual-cure luting cement. After removal of provisional restorations 1 week later, the tooth surface was examined for residual luting material with SEM. Traces of cement debris were found on all the prepared teeth surfaces for all six groups which were cemented with different methods. Cement debris was seen on teeth subsequent to the removal of provisional's. Dual-cure cement had the least residue following the cleansing procedures. Presence of smear layer had no statistical significance in comparison with cement residue. With the use of adhesive the cement debris was always found to be more than with the use of varnish. GIC showed maximum residual cement followed by dual-cure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Luting cements; Porcelain laminates veneers; Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

Year:  2013        PMID: 24604997      PMCID: PMC3935056          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0219-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation.

Authors:  D M Z Guerisoli; M A Marchesan; A D Walmsley; P J Lumley; J D Pecora
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.264

2.  A provisional restoration technique for laminate veneer preparations.

Authors:  D A Elledge; J K Hart; B L Schorr
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Porcelain laminate veneer provisionalization using visible light-curing acrylic resin.

Authors:  R E Rada; B J Jankowski
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.677

4.  Laminate veneer provisional restorations: a clinical report.

Authors:  M Zalkind; N Hochman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Effect of provisional cementing agents on provisional resins.

Authors:  S F Rosenstiel; A G Gegauff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  The efficacy of resin-compatible cavity varnishes in reducing dentin permeability to free monomer.

Authors:  A H Tjan; B E Grant; H Nemetz
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements.

Authors:  X Lepe; D J Bales; G H Johnson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.

Authors:  F H Takeda; T Harashima; Y Kimura; K Matsumoto
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.264

9.  Constructing direct porcelain laminate veneer provisionals.

Authors:  K S Kurtz
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Effect of a fluoride varnish on the margin leakage and retention of luted provisional crowns.

Authors:  Israel Lewinstein; Nitzan Fuhrer; Yehuda Ganor
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.