Literature DB >> 24604864

Antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of selected food preservatives against Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken samples.

Buket Er1, Burak Demirhan, Fatma Kaynak Onurdag, Selda Özgen Ozgacar, Aysel Bayhan Oktem.   

Abstract

Salmonella spp. are widespread foodborne pathogens that contaminate egg and poultry meats. Attachment, colonization, as well as biofilm formation capacity of Salmonella spp. on food and contact surfaces of food may cause continuous contamination. Biofilm may play a crucial role in the survival of salmonellae under unfavorable environmental conditions, such as in animal slaughterhouses and processing plants. This could serve as a reservoir compromising food safety and human health. Addition of antimicrobial preservatives extends shelf lives of food products, but even when products are supplemented with adequate amounts of preservatives, it is not always possible to inhibit the microorganisms in a biofilm community. In this study, our aims were i) to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBIC) of selected preservatives against planktonic and biofilm forms of Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken samples and Salmonella Typhimurium SL1344 standard strain, ii) to show the differences in the susceptibility patterns of same strains versus the planktonic and biofilm forms to the same preservative agent, and iii) to determine and compare antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of selected food preservatives against Salmonella spp. For this purpose, Salmonella Typhimurium SL1344 standard strain and 4 Salmonella spp. strains isolated from chicken samples were used. Investigation of antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of selected food preservatives against Salmonella spp. was done according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100-S18 guidelines and BioTimer assay, respectively. As preservative agents, pure ciprofloxacin, sodium nitrite, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate, methyl paraben, and propyl paraben were selected. As a result, it was determined that MBIC values are greater than the MIC values of the preservatives. This result verified the resistance seen in a biofilm community to food preservatives and highlighted this subject, not to be ignored in food applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salmonellaspp.; antibiofilm; antimicrobial; biofilm; food preservative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604864     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2013-03404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Hydrosol of Thymbra capitata Is a Highly Efficient Biocide against Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Biofilms.

Authors:  Foteini Karampoula; Efstathios Giaouris; Julien Deschamps; Agapi I Doulgeraki; George-John E Nychas; Florence Dubois-Brissonnet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of butyl paraben on the development and microbial composition of periphyton.

Authors:  Chaofeng Song; Juan Lin; Xiaolong Huang; Yonghong Wu; Jiantong Liu; Chenxi Wu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  An Evaluation of Alternatives to Nitrites and Sulfites to Inhibit the Growth of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in Meat Products.

Authors:  Alexandre Lamas; José Manuel Miranda; Beatriz Vázquez; Alberto Cepeda; Carlos Manuel Franco
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2016-10-31

4.  Antimicrobial Activity and Antibiofilm Potential of Coenzyme Q0 against Salmonella Typhimurium.

Authors:  Zhuokai Yang; Xiaoyu Ma; Yan Li; Huidong Xu; Xinyi Han; Ruixia Wang; Pengyu Zhao; Ziyi Li; Chao Shi
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-27

5.  Interaction between Different Pharmaceutical Excipients in Liquid Dosage Forms-Assessment of Cytotoxicity and Antimicrobial Activity.

Authors:  Dániel Nemes; Renátó Kovács; Fruzsina Nagy; Mirtill Mező; Nikolett Poczok; Zoltán Ujhelyi; Ágota Pető; Pálma Fehér; Ferenc Fenyvesi; Judit Váradi; Miklós Vecsernyés; Ildikó Bácskay
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.