PURPOSE: High resolution three-dimensional (3D) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging is performed with single R-wave gating to minimize lengthy acquisition durations. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), heart rate variability results in variable magnetization recovery between sequence repeats, and image quality is often poor. In this study, we implemented and tested a dynamic inversion time (dynamic-TI) scheme designed to reduce sequence sensitivity to heart rate variations. METHODS: An inversion-prepared 3D segmented gradient echo sequence was modified so that the TI varied automatically from beat-to-beat (dynamic-TI) based on the time since the last sequence repeat. 3D LGE acquisitions were performed in 17 patients prior to radio frequency ablation of persistent AF both with and without dynamic-TI. Qualitative image quality scores, blood signal-to-ghosting ratios (SGRs). and blood-myocardium contrast-to-ghosting ratios (CGRs) were compared. RESULTS: Image quality scores were higher with dynamic-TI than without dynamic-TI (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.8 ± 1.1, P = 0.008), as were blood-myocardium CGRs (13.8 ± 7.6 vs. 8.3 ± 6.1, P = 0.003) and blood SGRs (19.6 ± 8.5 vs. 13.1 ± 8.0, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The dynamic-TI algorithm improves image quality of 3D LGE imaging in this difficult patient population by reducing the sequence sensitivity to RR interval variations
PURPOSE: High resolution three-dimensional (3D) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging is performed with single R-wave gating to minimize lengthy acquisition durations. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), heart rate variability results in variable magnetization recovery between sequence repeats, and image quality is often poor. In this study, we implemented and tested a dynamic inversion time (dynamic-TI) scheme designed to reduce sequence sensitivity to heart rate variations. METHODS: An inversion-prepared 3D segmented gradient echo sequence was modified so that the TI varied automatically from beat-to-beat (dynamic-TI) based on the time since the last sequence repeat. 3D LGE acquisitions were performed in 17 patients prior to radio frequency ablation of persistent AF both with and without dynamic-TI. Qualitative image quality scores, blood signal-to-ghosting ratios (SGRs). and blood-myocardium contrast-to-ghosting ratios (CGRs) were compared. RESULTS: Image quality scores were higher with dynamic-TI than without dynamic-TI (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.8 ± 1.1, P = 0.008), as were blood-myocardium CGRs (13.8 ± 7.6 vs. 8.3 ± 6.1, P = 0.003) and blood SGRs (19.6 ± 8.5 vs. 13.1 ± 8.0, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The dynamic-TI algorithm improves image quality of 3D LGE imaging in this difficult patient population by reducing the sequence sensitivity to RR interval variations
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Troy J Badger; Marcos Daccarett; Nazem W Akoum; Yaw A Adjei-Poku; Nathan S Burgon; Thomas S Haslam; Saul Kalvaitis; Suman Kuppahally; Gaston Vergara; Lori McMullen; Paul A Anderson; Eugene Kholmovski; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2010-03-24
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; David S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; G Neal Kay; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; Samuel Wann; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffery L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Jonathan L Halperin; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; A John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap W Deckers; Catherine Despres; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; Joao Morais; Ady Osterspey; Juan Luis Tamargo; José Luis Zamorano Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Taigang He; Peter D Gatehouse; Lisa J Anderson; Mark Tanner; Jennifer Keegan; Dudley J Pennell; David N Firmin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Marcos Daccarett; Troy J Badger; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Christian Mahnkopf; Gaston Vergara; Eugene Kholmovski; Christopher J McGann; Dennis Parker; Johannes Brachmann; Rob S Macleod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John V Wylie; Dana C Peters; Vidal Essebag; Warren J Manning; Mark E Josephson; Thomas H Hauser Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Martin Georg Zeilinger; Marco Wiesmüller; Christoph Forman; Michaela Schmidt; Camila Munoz; Davide Piccini; Karl-Philipp Kunze; Radhouene Neji; René Michael Botnar; Claudia Prieto; Michael Uder; Matthias May; Wolfgang Wuest Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315