Literature DB >> 24604131

A comparison of the effects of indexation on standard echocardiographic measurements of the left heart in a healthy multi-racial population.

Katrina K Poppe1, Robert N Doughty, Helen J Walsh, Christopher M Triggs, Gillian A Whalley.   

Abstract

Accurate reference ranges for measurements from echocardiography rely on an understanding of the distribution of each measurement in the diverse, multi-racial world population. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of gender, age and ethnicity on common echocardiographic measures of the left heart, and to evaluate the effect of different methods of indexation on measurements from healthy, non-Caucasian populations. Standard echocardiographic measurements of left heart size and left ventricular mass (LVM) were assessed in 341 healthy volunteers. Indexation was performed using height, body surface area, and fat free mass (FFM). Quantile regression was used to derive age-adjusted values at the 5th, 50th and 95th‰ of each measurement, by gender, within Caucasians. The effect of indexation method across ethnic groups could then be compared. Indexation of m-mode dimensions may overcompensate for body size, resulting in people of smaller build (women and those of South or East Asian descent) developing higher indexed values than those of larger build (men and people of Maori or Pacific descent). Indexation of 2D volumes by any method improves the integration of values across ethnic groups, with FFM yielding the greatest integration. LVM increases with age, suggesting that the static reference values currently recommended for this measurement may not be appropriate. There are important differences in the distribution of measurements of left heart size by gender, ethnicity and age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604131     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0395-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  14 in total

1.  Left ventricular mass: allometric scaling, normative values, effect of obesity, and prognostic performance.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers; Marc L De Buyzere; Richard A Kronmal; Muhammad W Raja; Dirk De Bacquer; Tom Claessens; Thierry C Gillebert; Martin St John-Sutton; Ernst R Rietzschel
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  New insights into scaling of fat-free mass to height across children and adults.

Authors:  Zimian Wang; Junyi Zhang; Zhiliang Ying; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.

Authors:  Rebecca Thomson; Grant D Brinkworth; Jonathan D Buckley; Manny Noakes; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 6.  Does size matter? Clinical applications of scaling cardiac size and function for body size.

Authors:  Frederick E Dewey; David Rosenthal; Daniel J Murphy; Victor F Froelicher; Euan A Ashley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Left ventricular mass correlates with fat-free mass but not fat mass in adults.

Authors:  G A Whalley; G D Gamble; R N Doughty; A Culpan; L Plank; S MacMahon; N Sharpe
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Relations of left ventricular mass to fat-free and adipose body mass: the strong heart study. The Strong Heart Study Investigators.

Authors:  J N Bella; R B Devereux; M J Roman; M J O'Grady; T K Welty; E T Lee; R R Fabsitz; B V Howard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

Authors:  G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Influence of fat-free mass on detection of appropriateness of left ventricular mass: the HyperGEN Study.

Authors:  Giovanni de Simone; Richard B Devereux; Vittorio Palmieri; Jonathan N Bella; Albert Oberman; Dalane W Kitzman; Paul N Hopkins; D C Rao; Donna K Arnett
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimating heart mass from heart volume as measured from post-mortem computed tomography.

Authors:  Rexson D Tse; Regis R Lamberts; Hamish M Aitken-Buck; Matthew Moore; Gillian A Whalley; Larissa Lohner; Benjamin Ondruschka; Sean Coffey
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.456

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.