| Literature DB >> 24603695 |
Ani Manichaikul1, Stephen S Rich2, Heather Perry3, Joseph Yeboah4, Michelle Law5, Molly Davis3, Matthew Parker3, Michael Ragosta6, Jessica J Connelly5, Coleen A McNamara5, Angela M Taylor5.
Abstract
AIMS: We previously identified association between the ID3 SNP rs11574 and carotid intima-media thickness in the Diabetes Heart Study, a predominantly White diabetic population. The nonsynonymous SNP rs11574 results in an amino acid substitution in the C-terminal region of ID3, attenuating the dominant negative function of ID3 as an inhibitor of basic HLH factor E12-mediated transcription. In the current investigation, we characterize the association between the functionally significant polymorphism in ID3, rs11574, with human coronary pathology. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24603695 PMCID: PMC3946163 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of MESA Whites and IVUS participants, by rs11574 genotype.
| Cohort | ||||
| MESA Whites | CAVA | |||
| Ancestral allele | Risk allele carriers | Ancestral Allele | Risk allele carriers | |
|
| ||||
| No. subjects | 1517 | 1071 | 48 | 22 |
| Women | 770 (50.8) | 566 (52.8) | 23 (47.9) | 15 (68.1) |
| Age, years | 63.0 [54.0, 71.0] | 63.0 [54.0, 71.0] | 60.5 [51.5,66.5] | 63.0 [54.0,70.0] |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 27.2 [24.3, 30.6] | 26.9 [24.1, 30.3] | 31.3 [28.3,39.3] | 29.5 [26.8,37.9] |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 115.0 [95.0, 135.0] | 116.0 [96.0, 137.0] | 87.0 [68.5,117.5] | 80.5 [64.0,103.0] |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 49.0 [40.0, 61.0] | 50.0 [42.0, 61.0] | 36.0 [29.5, 45] | 36.0 [27, 43] |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 114.0 [77.0, 163.0] | 112.0 [76.0, 163.0] | 114.5 [65.5, 186.0] | 103.0 [76.0, 152.0] |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 105 (6.9) | 59 (5.5) | 31 (64.6) | 18 (81.8) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 582 (38.4) | 412 (38.5) | 37 (77.1) | 17 (77.2) |
| Lipid medication, n (%) | 305 (20.1) | 184 (17.2) | 37 (77.1) | 17 (77.2) |
Data are presented as n (%) for binary measures or median [IQR] for continuous measure. “Ancestral allele” and “Risk allele carriers” refer to rs11574 genotypes. “Ancestral allele” denotes homozygote for the common allele (CC) and risk allele carrier indicates heterozygote (CT) or homozygote for the less frequent allele (TT). For MESA, rs11574 was imputed, so we use genotype dosage (i.e. the estimated number of copies of the risk allele) to classify individuals as ancestral allele (dosage in [0, 0.5)) vs. risk allele carriers (dosage in [0.5, 2]).
*Summary statistics are reported for the subset of individuals with data available for at least one of the subclinical atherosclerosis phenotypes.
†In MESA, data are available for “any lipid lowering medication”. For CAVA, these data represent statin use.
Detailed race/ethnic-specific results for genetic association of rs11574 with coronary artery calcium (CAC) in MESA.
| Basic Model | Basic Model + LDL | ||||||||
| Group | Allele freq. | N | Beta | SE | P-value | N | Beta | SE | P-value |
| White | 0.239 | 2468 | 0.247 | 0.104 | 0.017 | 2432 | 0.263 | 0.105 | 0.012 |
| African American | 0.061 | 2533 | 0.140 | 0.163 | 0.392 | 2507 | 0.173 | 0.164 | 0.293 |
| Hispanic | 0.146 | 2100 | 0.078 | 0.144 | 0.590 | 2053 | 0.031 | 0.146 | 0.830 |
| Meta-analysis | 0.179 | 0.075 | 0.017 | 0.182 | 0.076 | 0.016 | |||
Allele frequencies and estimated effects are reported for the effect allele T (versus the reference allele C). Model 1 includes adjustment for age, sex, study site, and principal components of ancestry. Model 2 includes all covariates in Model 1, with the addition of LDL-C. Estimated effect sizes are presented based on an additive genetic model with 1 degree of freedom, for the logistic regression of CAC (presence/absence).
Figure 1(top panel) Representative IVUS frame from a patient with the ancestral allele (left) and a patient with the risk allele (right).
Light green represents fibrofatty plaque, dark green fibrous plaque, red necrotic core, and white calcium. (bottom panel) Representative QCA from a patient with the ancestral allele with a 28% stenosis (left) and a patient with the risk allele and stenosis of 73% (right). Automated edge detection is used to determine stenosis severity.
Figure 2Effect of the risk allele on burden and stenosis as measured by IVUS.
Burden differed significantly between groups with greater burden in the presence of the risk allele. Stenosis was marginally significant. Vertical line represents complete spread of the data. Burden represents the percent of the vessel wall occupied by plaque. Stenosis represents percent luminal stenosis.
Multivariate predictors of Atheroma Burden and Stenosis.
| Multivariate Predictors of Burden | |||||||
| MODEL 1 | Beta | SE | p-value | MODEL 2 | Beta | SE | p-value |
| Age | 0.325 | 0.175 | 0.0671 | Age | 0.325 | 0.177 | 0.0714 |
| Genotype | 9.578 | 3.657 | 0.0110 | Genotype | 9.294 | 3.767 | 0.0163 |
| Gender | −1.527 | 3.393 | 0.6542 | Gender | −1.276 | 3.479 | 0.7151 |
| LDL | −0.053 | 0.056 | 0.3521 | LDL | −0.046 | 0.059 | 0.4322 |
| Hypertension | −1.402 | 4.073 | 0.7318 | ||||
| Diabetes | 1.652 | 3.939 | 0.6764 | ||||