Literature DB >> 24603694

Towards a structure-based exciton Hamiltonian for the CP29 antenna of photosystem II.

Frank Müh1, Dominik Lindorfer, Marcel Schmidt am Busch, Thomas Renger.   

Abstract

The exciton Hamiltonian pertaining to the first excited states of chlorophyll (Chl) a and b pigments in the minor light-harvesting complex CP29 of plant photosystem II is determined based on the recent crystal structure at 2.8 Å resolution applying a combined quantum chemical/electrostatic approach as used earlier for the major light-harvesting complex LHCII. Two electrostatic methods for the calculation of the local transition energies (site energies), referred to as the Poisson-Boltzmann/quantum chemical (PBQC) and charge density coupling (CDC) method, which differ in the way the polarizable environment of the pigments is described, are compared and found to yield comparable results, when tested against fits of measured optical spectra (linear absorption, linear dichroism, circular dichroism, and fluorescence). The crystal structure shows a Chl a/b ratio of 2.25, whereas a ratio between 2.25 and 3.0 can be estimated from the simulation of experimental spectra. Thus, it is possible that up to one Chl b is lost in CP29 samples. The lowest site energy is found to be located at Chl a604 close to neoxanthin. This assignment is confirmed by the simulation of wild-type-minus-mutant difference spectra of reconstituted CP29, where a tyrosine residue next to Chl a604 is modified in the mutant. Nonetheless, the terminal emitter domain (TED), i.e. the pigments contributing mostly to the lowest exciton state, is found at the Chl a611-a612-a615 trimer due to strong excitonic coupling between these pigments, with the largest contributions from Chls a611 and a612. A major difference between CP29 and LHCII is that Chl a610 is not the energy sink in CP29, which is presumably to a large extent due to the replacement of a lysine residue with alanine close to the TED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24603694     DOI: 10.1039/c3cp55166k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  7 in total

1.  Possible role of interference, protein noise, and sink effects in nonphotochemical quenching in photosynthetic complexes.

Authors:  Gennady P Berman; Alexander I Nesterov; Shmuel Gurvitz; Richard T Sayre
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Carotenoid dark state to chlorophyll energy transfer in isolated light-harvesting complexes CP24 and CP29.

Authors:  Daniel A Gacek; Christoph-Peter Holleboom; Pen-Nan Liao; Marco Negretti; Roberta Croce; Peter Jomo Walla
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Efficiency of energy funneling in the photosystem II supercomplex of higher plants.

Authors:  Christoph Kreisbeck; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 9.825

4.  Asymmetry in the Q y Fluorescence and Absorption Spectra of Chlorophyll a Pertaining to Exciton Dynamics.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Reimers; Margus Rätsep; Arvi Freiberg
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 5.221

5.  Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra of Molecular Aggregates With the Full Cumulant Expansion.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cupellini; Filippo Lipparini; Jianshu Cao
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Towards a quantitative description of excitonic couplings in photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes: quantum chemistry driven multiscale approaches.

Authors:  Christian Friedl; Dmitri G Fedorov; Thomas Renger
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 7.  Structural basis of light-harvesting in the photosystem II core complex.

Authors:  Frank Müh; Athina Zouni
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.725

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.