| Literature DB >> 24603526 |
Zhou Fan1, Guo-Fang Jiang2, Yu-Xiang Liu1, Qi-Xin He3, Benjamin Blanchard3.
Abstract
Geographic distance and geographical barriers likely play a considerable role in structuring genetic variation in species, although some migratory species may have less phylogeographic structure on a smaller spatial scale. Here, genetic diversity and the phylogenetic structure among geographical populations of the yellow-spined bamboo locust, Ceracris kiangsu, were examined with 16S rDNA and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs). In this study, no conspicuous phylogeographical structure was discovered from either Maximum parsimony (MP) and Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic analyses. The effect of geographical isolation was not conspicuous on a large spatial scale.At smaller spatial scales local diversity of some populations within mountainous areas were detected using Nei's genetic distance and AMOVA. There is a high level of genetic diversity and a low genetic differentiation among populations in the C. kiangsu of South and Southeast China. Our analyses indicate that C. kiangsu is a monophyletic group. Our results also support the hypothesis that the C. kiangsu population is in a primary differentiation stage. Given the mismatch distribution, it is likely that a population expansion in C. kiangsu occurred about 0.242 Ma during the Quaternary interglaciation. Based on historical reports, we conjecture that human activities had significant impacts on the C. kiangsu gene flow.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24603526 PMCID: PMC3946154 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Locations of C. kiangsu populations sampled for AFLP and mtDNA analyses.
Sampling site, geographical coordinates, elevation (metres), sample size (Nind) of sampled Ceracris kiangsu populations, and sequence information of each geographical population calculated from DnaSP software.
| NO | Sampling site | Latitude | Longtitude | Elevation |
|
|
|
| Variance of Hd | St.Dev |
| Sampling variance | St.Dev |
|
|
| 30°47′19″N | 119°28′51″E | 216 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 0.448 | 0.018 | 0.134 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
|
|
| 31°22′05″N | 116°59′13″E | 42 | 15 | 49 | 3 | 0.362 | 0.021 | 0.145 | 0.014 | 0.000 | 0.011 |
|
|
| 29°50′14″N | 106°23′46″E | 600 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 27°02′08″N | 118°14′14″E | 194 | 14 | 24 | 3 | 0.275 | 0.022 | 0.148 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 0.007 |
|
|
| 24°29′18″N | 117°21′01″E | 345 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 23°36′17″N | 112°23′18″E | 52 | 34 | 21 | 3 | 0.266 | 0.008 | 0.092 | 0.010 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
|
|
| 25°18′25″N | 110°23′40″E | 277 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 25°55′43″N | 111°09′44″E | 286 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.008 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 25°12′29″N | 109°23′45″E | 160 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 0.111 | 0.009 | 0.096 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
|
|
| 26°43′04″N | 109°10′52″E | 552 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 28°41′47″N | 108°16′16″E | 662 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 31°05′30″N | 114°21′01″E | 100 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 0.279 | 0.015 | 0.123 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 27°07′01″N | 112°41′36″E | 140 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 29°35′23″N | 112°32′17″E | 32 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 0.563 | 0.004 | 0.063 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 26°06′30″N | 111°49′28″E | 460 | 18 | 24 | 2 | 0.111 | 0.009 | 0.096 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.005 |
|
|
| 28°30′09″N | 112°09′08″E | 55 | 16 | 13 | 10 | 0.917 | 0.002 | 0.049 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
|
|
| 28°54′09″N | 111°29′20″E | 183 | 46 | 4 | 5 | 0.572 | 0.001 | 0.037 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 28°10′11″N | 112°40′06″E | 65 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 0.526 | 0.001 | 0.040 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 32°04′14″N | 118°50′57″E | 170 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 0.595 | 0.005 | 0.073 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
|
|
| 26°19′35″N | 116°20′36″E | 408 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 28°29′57″N | 104°55′58″E | 309 | 19 | 19 | 3 | 0.368 | 0.0158 | 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
|
|
| 30°07′45″N | 104°37′44″E | 355 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
| 21°29′18″N | 101°33′23″E | 771 | 5 | 68 | 5 | 1.000 | 0.016 | 0.126 | 0.073 | 0.000 | 0.014 |
|
|
| 21°55′25″N | 101°15′56″E | 549 | 7 | 44 | 6 | 0.952 | 0.009 | 0.096 | 0.425 | 0.000 | 0.010 |
|
|
| 30°19′03″N | 119°25′57″E | 191 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0.143 | 0.014 | 0.119 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
| 393 | 122 | 33 | 0.436 | 0.001 | 0.029 | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
S, number of polymorphic/indel/missing sites; h, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; sampling variance of Hd; St.Dev, standard deviation of haplotype diversity; Pi, nucleotide diversity, sampling variance of Pi, and standard deviation of Pi.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of C. kiangsu based on geographical distances.
| Source of variation | Df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | φ-statistics | P value |
|
| 19 | 21.229 | 0.031 Va | 13.98 | φCT = 0.140 | 0.000 |
|
| 5 | 2.855 | 0.023 Vb | 10.42 | φSC = 0.121 | 0.022 |
|
| 368 | 62.643 | 0.170 Vc | 75.59 | φST = 0.244 | 0.152 |
|
| 392 | 86.728 | 0.224 |
Population-specific F indices.
| Population | 16S rRNA |
|
| 0.224 |
|
| 0.213 |
|
| 0.225 |
|
| 0.250 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.207 |
|
| 0.250 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.166 |
|
| 0.164 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.275 |
|
| 0.269 |
|
| 0.273 |
|
| 0.290 |
|
| 0.273 |
|
| 0.238 |
|
| 0.157 |
|
| 0.203 |
|
| 0.249 |
|
| 0.203 |
|
| 0.290 |
Assumed all group have a common ancestral population, these population-specific coefficients would represent the degree of evolution of particular populations from a common ancestral population.
Figure 2Most parsimonious median-joining (MJ) network for C. kiangsu 16S haplotypes.
The size of the circles is proportional to the frequency of represented haplotypes. Geographical population indicated by colour as below. Nodes with small white circles are median vectors that represent hypothetical missing links or unsampled haplotypes.
Figure 3Maximum parsimony tree based on 16S rRNA haplotypes of 393 C. kiangsu individuals.
The number of individuals sampled, observed number of alleles (Na), Effective number of alleles [Kimura and Crow (1964)](Ne), Nei's (1973) gene diversity (H), Shannon's Information index [Lewontin (1972)](I) and standard deviation of all index (St. Dev), the number of polymorphic loci in each population, and the percentage of polymorphic loci.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| percentage | |
|
| 10 | 1.386 | 0.488 | 1.129 | 0.230 | 0.087 | 0.136 | 0.144 | 0.207 | 139 | 38.61% |
|
| 10 | 1.456 | 0.499 | 1.126 | 0.192 | 0.091 | 0.124 | 0.155 | 0.195 | 164 | 45.56% |
|
| 9 | 1.264 | 0.441 | 1.113 | 0.245 | 0.072 | 0.140 | 0.113 | 0.209 | 95 | 26.39% |
|
| 10 | 1.419 | 0.494 | 1.175 | 0.276 | 0.113 | 0.159 | 0.179 | 0.236 | 151 | 41.94% |
|
| 10 | 1.544 | 0.499 | 1.137 | 0.197 | 0.100 | 0.121 | 0.174 | 0.189 | 196 | 54.44% |
|
| 4 | 1.143 | 0.360 | 1.070 | 0.195 | 0.047 | 0.117 | 0.074 | 0.179 | 55 | 15.28% |
|
| 10 | 1.494 | 0.501 | 1.147 | 0.230 | 0.102 | 0.136 | 0.171 | 0.207 | 178 | 49.44% |
|
| 10 | 1.103 | 0.304 | 1.040 | 0.152 | 0.026 | 0.089 | 0.041 | 0.135 | 37 | 10.28% |
|
| 6 | 1.322 | 0.468 | 1.125 | 0.233 | 0.083 | 0.139 | 0.134 | 0.211 | 116 | 32.22% |
|
| 10 | 1.381 | 0.486 | 1.135 | 0.234 | 0.091 | 0.140 | 0.149 | 0.213 | 137 | 38.06% |
|
| 2 | 1.078 | 0.268 | 1.055 | 0.190 | 0.032 | 0.111 | 0.047 | 0.162 | 28 | 7.78% |
|
| 3 | 1.319 | 0.467 | 1.181 | 0.294 | 0.111 | 0.170 | 0.169 | 0.253 | 115 | 31.94% |
|
| 2 | 1.128 | 0.334 | 1.090 | 0.236 | 0.053 | 0.139 | 0.077 | 0.202 | 46 | 12.78% |
|
| 2 | 1.031 | 0.172 | 1.022 | 0.122 | 0.013 | 0.071 | 0.019 | 0.104 | 11 | 3.06% |
|
| 10 | 1.378 | 0.486 | 1.140 | 0.256 | 0.091 | 0.145 | 0.147 | 0.217 | 136 | 37.78% |
|
| 10 | 1.200 | 0.401 | 1.066 | 0.183 | 0.044 | 0.108 | 0.072 | 0.164 | 82 | 20.00% |
|
| 10 | 1.389 | 0.488 | 1.127 | 0.228 | 0.086 | 0.135 | 0.143 | 0.205 | 140 | 38.89% |
|
| 10 | 1.239 | 0.427 | 1.081 | 0.191 | 0.055 | 0.116 | 0.091 | 0.179 | 86 | 23.89% |
|
| 10 | 1.392 | 0.489 | 1.104 | 0.193 | 0.074 | 0.118 | 0.127 | 0.184 | 141 | 39.17% |
|
| 10 | 1.394 | 0.489 | 1.159 | 0.271 | 0.101 | 0.154 | 0.162 | 0.229 | 142 | 39.44% |
|
| 10 | 1.269 | 0.444 | 1.077 | 0.180 | 0.054 | 0.110 | 0.091 | 0.171 | 97 | 26.94% |
|
| 10 | 1.297 | 0.458 | 1.099 | 0.204 | 0.068 | 0.124 | 0.111 | 0.192 | 107 | 29.72% |
|
| 10 | 1.350 | 0.478 | 1.079 | 0.144 | 0.061 | 0.099 | 0.108 | 0.163 | 126 | 35.00% |
|
| 10 | 1.442 | 0.487 | 1.129 | 0.221 | 0.009 | 0.130 | 0.152 | 0.199 | 159 | 44.17% |
|
| 5 | 1.319 | 0.467 | 1.138 | 0.231 | 0.089 | 0.146 | 0.142 | 0.221 | 115 | 31.94% |
Figure 4Arbitrarily rooted neighbour-joining tree based on Nei's genetic distances of AFLPs between 25 geographic populations.
Figure 5(a) Bayesian assignment proportions for K = 2 clusters determined in STRUCTURE 2.2 software.
Each vertical bar represents one geographic populations; colours distinguish membership to different clusters. The number of each population are list as below: 1 = Shucheng; 2 = Quanzhou; 3 = Changning; 4 = Jianou; 5 = Guangde; 6 = Guilin; 7 = Guangning; 8 = Jinyunshan; 9 = Mayanghe; 10 = Jingpin; 11 = Huarong; 12 = Hengyang; 13 = Shicheng; 14 = Menglun; 15 = Mengla; 16 = Nanjing; 17 = Quzhou; 18 = Rongan; 19 = Changning; 20 = Shuangpai; 21 = Taojiang; 22 = Taoyuan; 23 = Wuhan; 24 = Zijinshan; 25 = Ziyang. (b) K (Evanno et al. 2005) as a function of K. K calculations not possible for K = 1 or the maximum consecutive value of K tested (K = 10).