Deborah J Wiebe1, Chong Man Chow2, Debra L Palmer2, Jonathan Butner2, Jorie M Butler3, Peter Osborn2, Cynthia A Berg2. 1. Division of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh,Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), and VA SLC GRECC VHA Health System dwiebe@ucmerced.edu. 2. Division of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh,Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), and VA SLC GRECC VHA Health System. 3. Division of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh,Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), and VA SLC GRECC VHA Health SystemDivision of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh,Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), and VA SLC GRECC VHA Health SystemDivision of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh,Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), and VA SLC GRECC VHA Health SystemDivision of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh,Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Division of Geriatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, VA Center for Informatics Decision Enhancement and Surveillance (IDEAS), and VA SLC GRECC VHA Health System.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify whether changes in pubertal status and self-efficacy for diabetes management are associated with longitudinal declines in parental responsibility for diabetes, and to determine whether these factors moderate associations between declining parental responsibility and deteriorating adherence across adolescence. METHODS: Adolescents (N = 252; 53.6% females) with type 1 diabetes, mothers, and 188 fathers participated in a 2.5-year longitudinal study. Self-reports of pubertal status, adolescent efficacy, parental responsibility, and adherence were completed every 6 months (6 time points). RESULTS: Latent growth curve modeling revealed that longitudinal increases in efficacy and pubertal maturation were uniquely associated with longitudinal declines in parental responsibility. Declines in parental responsibility were related to deterioration in adherence especially when adolescents did not report concomitant growth in self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of responsibility for diabetes management across adolescence may be more optimal when adolescents' increased independence is titrated to their changing self-efficacy beliefs.
OBJECTIVE: To identify whether changes in pubertal status and self-efficacy for diabetes management are associated with longitudinal declines in parental responsibility for diabetes, and to determine whether these factors moderate associations between declining parental responsibility and deteriorating adherence across adolescence. METHODS: Adolescents (N = 252; 53.6% females) with type 1 diabetes, mothers, and 188 fathers participated in a 2.5-year longitudinal study. Self-reports of pubertal status, adolescent efficacy, parental responsibility, and adherence were completed every 6 months (6 time points). RESULTS: Latent growth curve modeling revealed that longitudinal increases in efficacy and pubertal maturation were uniquely associated with longitudinal declines in parental responsibility. Declines in parental responsibility were related to deterioration in adherence especially when adolescents did not report concomitant growth in self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of responsibility for diabetes management across adolescence may be more optimal when adolescents' increased independence is titrated to their changing self-efficacy beliefs.
Authors: Janet Silverstein; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Kenneth Copeland; Leslie Plotnick; Francine Kaufman; Lori Laffel; Larry Deeb; Margaret Grey; Barbara Anderson; Lea Ann Holzmeister; Nathaniel Clark Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Cynthia A Berg; Jonathan E Butner; Jorie M Butler; Pamela S King; Amy E Hughes; Deborah J Wiebe Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Anthony T Vesco; Barbara J Anderson; Lori M B Laffel; Lawrence M Dolan; Lisa M Ingerski; Korey K Hood Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2010-05-05
Authors: Tim Wysocki; Michael A Harris; Lisa M Buckloh; Karen Wilkinson; Michelle Sadler; Nelly Mauras; Neil H White Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2005-03-16
Authors: Clarissa S Holmes; Rusan Chen; Randi Streisand; Donna E Marschall; Sari Souter; Erika E Swift; Catherine C Peterson Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2005-10-12
Authors: Eveline R Goethals; Sarah S Jaser; Chris Verhaak; Sofie Prikken; Kristina Casteels; Koen Luyckx; Alan M Delamater Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 5.602