Literature DB >> 24602503

Safety of hydroinfusion in percutaneous thermal ablation of hepatic malignancies.

Justin P McWilliams1, Adam N Plotnik2, Eric Y Sako2, Steven S Raman2, Nelly Tan2, Surachate Siripongsakun2, Michael Douek2, David S Lu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hydroinfusion is a commonly used ancillary procedure during percutaneous thermal ablation of the liver that is used to separate and protect sensitive structures from the ablation zone. However, risks of hydroinfusion have not been systematically studied. The purpose of the present study was to systematically examine the frequency and severity of local and systemic complications related to hydroinfusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to April 2012, 410 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous thermal hepatic tumor ablation. One hundred fifty patients in the study group underwent hydroinfusion and 260 in the control group did not. Patient charts and imaging studies of both groups were reviewed to compare incidences of complications that could potentially be caused by hydroinfusion, including pleural effusion, bowel injury, infection, electrolyte imbalance, and hyperglycemia.
RESULTS: Pleural effusions were found to occur more commonly in the hydroinfusion group (45.3%) than in the control group (16.5%). Pleural effusions were significantly larger (P < .001) and more likely to be symptomatic (six of 150 patients; P = .006) in the hydroinfusion group than in the control group (one of 260 patients). Multiple patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for association with development of major hydroinfusion-type complications (requiring therapy or extended/repeat hospitalization). Subcapsular location of tumor was the only variable to reach statistical significance (P = .009), with all major hydroinfusion-type complications (n = 10) occurring in patients with subcapsular tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: Hydroinfusion is a safe procedure overall. However, pleural effusions occur commonly after hydroinfusion, tend to be moderate or large in size, and are occasionally symptomatic.
Copyright © 2014 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24602503     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  3 in total

1.  Microwave versus Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparison of Efficacy at a Single Center.

Authors:  Theodora A Potretzke; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Christopher L Brace; Parul Agarwal; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Advantages of Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation Over Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyuk Soo Eun; Byung Seok Lee; In Sun Kwon; Gee Young Yun; Eaum Seok Lee; Jong Seok Joo; Jae Kyu Sung; Hee Seok Moon; Sun Hyung Kang; Ju Seok Kim; Hae Jin Shin; Tae Kyun Kim; Kwangsik Chun; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Percutaneous thermal ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas: influence of tumor-surface contact and protrusion on therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Akeanong Worakitsitisatorn; David S Lu; Min Woo Lee; Nazanin H Asvadi; Amin Moshksar; Alexander D Yuen; Justin McWilliams; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.