Literature DB >> 24602433

Comparison of pain scale preferences and pain intensity according to pain scales among Turkish Patients: a descriptive study.

Yazile Yazici Sayin1, Neriman Akyolcu2.   

Abstract

Pain scale preferences may vary among patients. Providing a choice of which pain scale to use might be helpful for patients. The aim of this study was to determine patient pain scale preferences and compare the level of agreement among pain scales commonly used during postoperative pain assessment. A total of 621 patients during the early postoperative period were enrolled in this descriptive study. A questionnaire form, the faces pain scale (FPS), visual analog scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS), verbal descriptor scale (VDS), thermometer pain scale (TPS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were used to collect data. Most patients reported that their pain was not measured with any of the pain scales. Patient preference for pain scales were as follows: 97.4% FPS, 88.6% NRS, 84.1% VDS, 78.1% TPS, 60.1% SFMPQ, 37.0% BPI, 11.4% VAS, and 10.5% MPQ. Education was an important factor in the preferences for all scales (p < .000). The level of pain determined by the VAS did not correlate with the level of pain identified by the NRS, TPS, FPS, and VDS (p < .05). There was no difference among the levels of pain for the NRS, TPS, FPS and VDS (p > .05), but there was for the VAS (p < .05). The pain scales chosen should be reliable, valid, and able to evaluate the effects of treatment. The results suggest that the NRS, TPS, FPS, and VDS were appropriate pain rating scales for the participants in this study, and that the VAS should be used in combination with one of these scales.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24602433     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs        ISSN: 1524-9042            Impact factor:   1.929


  6 in total

1.  Health literacy, pain intensity and pain perception in patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Philipp Johannes Köppen; Thomas Ernst Dorner; Katharina Viktoria Stein; Judit Simon; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries.

Authors:  Anupa Pathak; Saurab Sharma; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-08-06

3.  Validity and Reliability of 11-face Faces Pain Scale in the Iranian Elderly Community with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Reza Fadayevatan; Mahtab Alizadeh-Khoei; Salaheddin Taleb Hessami-Azar; Farshad Sharifi; Marjan Haghi; Bijan Kaboudi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

4.  Validity and Utility of Four Pain Intensity Measures for Use in International Research.

Authors:  Raviwon Atisook; Pramote Euasobhon; Arunee Saengsanon; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Effect of different cold application materials on pain during chest tube removal: three-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Dilara Soydan; Gülay Altun Uğraş
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Development and assessment of a verbal response scale for the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in a low-literacy, non-western population.

Authors:  Anupa Pathak; Saurab Sharma; Allen W Heinemann; Paul W Stratford; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.440

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.