Literature DB >> 2460230

Internucleosomal cleavage and chromosomal degradation by bleomycin and phleomycin in yeast.

C W Moore1.   

Abstract

Native chromosomal structure, breakage, and overall degradation were studied following the reaction of whole cells with the anticancer drug bleomycin and structurally related phleomycin. Electrophoretic analyses of cellular DNA established that phleomycin was more reactive with DNA than equimolar bleomycin in the range of 0.67-33 x 10(-6) M, produced an optimally visible, though less-extended, oligonucleosomal series at concentrations 12 to 35 times lower than bleomycin, and degraded DNA within nucleosomes. Chromosomes were cleaved into nucleosomes and degraded by phleomycin over substantially narrower dose ranges (1 to 2 x 10(-6) M) than by bleomycin (about 1 to 17 x 10(-5) M). Bleomycin exhibited higher specificity for internucleosomal cleavage than phleomycin, and trimmed but did not degrade nucleosomes at less than or equal to 3 x 10(-5) M. Identical nucleosomal repeat sizes (166 +/- 3.8 base pairs) were produced by the analogues. The higher reactivity of phleomycin does not result solely from its higher rate of internucleosomal and intranucleosomal chromatin cleavage, since short phleomycin reactions always resulted in more extensive chromatin cleavage than long bleomycin reactions at low concentrations. In vivo (cellular) repair of chromatin damage was comparable (approximately 90% in 1 h) after cells were exposed to low drug concentrations which produced similar numbers of chromatin breaks, and thus also does not account for the higher chromosomal breakage caused by phleomycin than bleomycin at low doses. At high doses, unrepaired breaks are substantially higher after phleomycin treatments than after bleomycin treatments, and thus contribute to the higher lethal effects of phleomycin than bleomycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2460230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  21 in total

1.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sin3p facilitates DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Ali Jazayeri; Andrew D McAinsh; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Deletion of MAG1 and MRE11 enhances the sensitivity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HUG1P-GFP promoter-reporter construct to genotoxicity.

Authors:  Michael G Benton; Nathaniel R Glasser; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  The ATM-related Tel1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae controls a checkpoint response following phleomycin treatment.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakada; Toshiyasu Shimomura; Kunihiro Matsumoto; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Solution structure of the hydroperoxide of Co(III) phleomycin complexed with d(CCAGGCCTGG)2: evidence for binding by partial intercalation.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Dana E Vanderwall; Christopher J Turner; Silvia Hoehn; Jingyang Chen; John W Kozarich; JoAnne Stubbe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Growth phase dependency of chromatin cleavage and degradation by bleomycin.

Authors:  C W Moore; C S Jones; L A Wall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Xbp1-mediated histone H4 deacetylation contributes to DNA double-strand break repair in yeast.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Hua Chen; Chan Gao; Peng Xue; Fuquan Yang; Jing-Dong J Han; Bing Zhou; Ye-Guang Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Bleomycin affects cell wall anchorage of mannoproteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Beaudouin; S T Lim; J A Steide; M Powell; J McKoy; A J Pramanik; E Johnson; C W Moore; P N Lipke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Lesions and preferential initial localization of [S-methyl-3H]bleomycin A2 on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls and membranes.

Authors:  C W Moore; R Del Valle; J McKoy; A Pramanik; R E Gordon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Induction of morphological alterations by antineoplastic agents in yeast.

Authors:  E Stavrinidis; A Delitheos; E Tiligada
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakada; Kunihiro Matsumoto; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.