Literature DB >> 24602145

Role of Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation and lipopolysaccharide in relapse of melioidosis.

D Limmathurotsakul1, A Paeyao, S Wongratanacheewin, N Saiprom, N Takpho, J Thaipadungpanit, N Chantratita, V Wuthiekanun, N P J Day, S J Peacock.   

Abstract

We examined whether quantitative biofilm formation and/or lipopolysaccharide type of Burkholderia pseudomallei was associated with relapsing melioidosis. We devised a 1:4 nested case-control study in which both cases and controls were drawn from a cohort of patients with primary melioidosis. Paired isolates from 80 patients with relapse and single isolates from 184 patients without relapse were tested. Relapse was associated with biofilm formation of the primary infecting isolate (conditional OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.27-3.25; p 0.003), but not with lipopolysaccharide type (p 0.74). This finding highlights the importance of biofilm formation in relapsing melioidosis.
© 2014 The Authors. Clinical Microbiology and Infection published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; lipopolysaccharide; melioidosis; pseudomallei; relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24602145      PMCID: PMC4304327          DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


Introduction

Melioidosis, an infectious disease caused by the Tier 1 select agent Burkholderia pseudomallei, is notoriously difficult to cure 1. North-eastern Thailand is a hot spot for this infection, with an annual incidence of 21.0 per 100 000 population and a case-fatality rate of 40% 2. For patients who survive their first episode of infection, the single most important complication is recurrent melioidosis following apparent cure. This occurs in approximately 13% of patients followed for 10 years, and half of the recurrences occur within 12 months of the primary episode 3. Approximately one-quarter of those with relapse will die as a direct result 4,5. Biofilm formation has been described as an important factor associated with persistent infections in a number of infectious diseases, including Burkholderia cepacia infection in cystic fibrosis patients 6–8, but this has not been formally evaluated in relation to relapse of melioidosis. A previous study of a small number of isolates associated with relapse suggested that B. pseudomallei with uncommon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) types (smooth type B and rough type) might be associated with relapse 9. Here, we evaluated biofilm formation and LPS type of B. pseudomallei isolates from patients with primary melioidosis drawn from a cohort described previously 5, and determined their associations with relapse. We devised a 1 : 4 nested case–control study in which both cases and controls were drawn from a cohort of patients with primary melioidosis identified between 1986 and 2004 who survived to receive oral antimicrobial therapy and were observed until July 2005 5. Cases were all patients who developed at least one episode of relapse during the study period, with relapse being verified by genotyping of the primary and relapse isolates 5. Controls were randomly selected from those patients in the cohort who had not developed relapse by the time relapse was identified in cases. Cases and controls were matched for known risk factors for relapse, including choice and duration of oral antimicrobial therapy, positive blood culture, and multifocal distribution of infection at first presentation. Primary isolates from cases and controls and relapse isolates from cases were evaluated for quantitative biofilm formation and LPS. All isolates were stored at −80°C prior to the evaluation. The first isolate cultured and saved from each episode was used in the study. Quantitative estimation of biofilm formation was performed with a modified microtitre plate test, as described previously 10–12. All experiments were independently conducted twice, and the results reported were the average from those two experiments. LPS was extracted, and the type was defined as smooth type A, smooth type B, or rough type, as described previously 9. A conditional logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationships between independent factors and the relapse outcome. Selection of controls and statistical analyses were conducted with STATA, version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). The study was approved by the Ethical and Scientific review subcommittee of the Thai Ministry of Public Health 5. Of 86 and 202 primary isolates from cases and matched controls, 80 (93%) and 184 (91%), respectively, were available for study and included in the analysis. Patients in the case and control groups had comparable characteristics for the matched variables (Table1).
Table 1

Characteristics of cases and controls

CharacteristicsCases N = 80Controls N = 184p-Valuea
Median age in years (interquartile range)49 (41–58)47 (38–57)0.47
Male sex, n (%)53 (66)104 (56)0.32
Underlying diseases, n (%)
 Diabetes mellitus49 (61)103 (56)0.24
 Renal calculi14 (18)21 (11)0.43
Distribution of melioidosisb, n (%)
 Localized27 (34)64 (35)NA
 Multifocal13 (16)29 (16)
 Bacteraemic23 (29)56 (30)
 Disseminated17 (21)35 (19)
Site or organ(s) infected during the primary episode, n (%)
 Bacteraemia40 (50)91 (49)NA
 Pneumonia30 (38)75 (41)0.84
 Liver abscess24 (30)45 (24)0.28
 Splenic abscess29 (36)54 (29)0.50
 Septic arthritis8 (10)19 (10)0.67
 Osteomyelitis2 (3)4 (2)0.85
Biofilm formation, corrected OD630 nm (interquartile range)0.95 (0.75–1.28)0.79 (0.63–1.06)0.003
Biofilm, n (%)
 Smooth type A79 (99)181 (98)0.74
 Smooth type B1 (1)2 (1)
 Rough type1 (1)

NA, not applicable, as choice and duration of oral antimicrobial therapy, positive blood culture result and multifocal distribution of first presentation were matched variables; OD, optical density.

p-Values were calculated with a conditional logistic regression model.

Melioidosis was classified as localized (single focus of infection and a negative blood culture result), multifocal (one or more non-contiguous foci of infection and a negative blood culture result), bacteraemic (a positive blood culture result plus a single or no identifiable focus of infection), and disseminated (a positive blood culture result plus one or more non-contiguous foci of infection).

Characteristics of cases and controls NA, not applicable, as choice and duration of oral antimicrobial therapy, positive blood culture result and multifocal distribution of first presentation were matched variables; OD, optical density. p-Values were calculated with a conditional logistic regression model. Melioidosis was classified as localized (single focus of infection and a negative blood culture result), multifocal (one or more non-contiguous foci of infection and a negative blood culture result), bacteraemic (a positive blood culture result plus a single or no identifiable focus of infection), and disseminated (a positive blood culture result plus one or more non-contiguous foci of infection). First, we determined whether the quantitative production of biofilm by the primary isolate influenced the likelihood that relapse would occur. Biofilm production by primary isolates from patients with relapse was higher than that for primary isolates from matched patients without relapse (median corrected optical density (OD)630 nm of 0.95 (interquartile range 0.75–1.28) vs. 0.79 (interquartile range 0.63–1.06)). This was independently associated with the relapse outcome (conditional OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.27–3.25; p 0.003). Overall, 99% of primary isolates from cases and 98% from controls had LPS smooth type A. LPS smooth type B was found in one (1%) case and in two (1%) controls, and rough-type LPS was found in one (1%) control. An association between LPS type of the primary isolate and relapse was not found (p 0.74). Next, we determined whether there was any difference in biofilm formation and in LPS type between primary and relapse isolates from the same relapse cases. From 80 relapse cases, 71 (89%) paired primary–relapse isolates were available and evaluated. Biofilm formation of the primary isolate and that of the relapse isolate were not different (mean difference for corrected OD630 nm of 0.002; 95% CI −0.16 to 0.16; p 0.98). The LPS type of the primary–relapse pair was the same for all 71 isolates (LPS smooth type A, n = 70; LPS smooth type B, n = 1). In this study, we have shown that a quantitative measure of biofilm formation by the primary isolate is associated with relapse in patients with melioidosis. This was independent of known clinical risk factors for relapse, including choice and duration of oral antimicrobial therapy, positive blood culture, and multifocal distribution of infection at first presentation, factors that were matched by the nested case–control study design. This provides the first evidence to suggest that biofilm formation of B. pseudomallei in vitro is associated with relapse in human melioidosis, and is consistent with findings reported for Escherichia coli 6 and other biofilm-producing bacteria 7,8. We also observed that quantitative biofilm formation did not differ between paired primary and relapse isolates. This lack of detectable change between isolates of the same lineage that are separated by the period spanning human infection, quiescence and re-emergence argues against the notion that increased biofilm formation occurs in vivo through positive selection. Quantitative biofilm formation by isolates in this study was lower overall than that reported previously for 34 clinical B. pseudomallei isolates (mean corrected OD630 nm of 1.98 ± 0.32) 12. Possible explanations are that the means used in the previous study were skewed by isolates with exceptionally high biofilm formation. In addition, the isolates in the study described here were only from patients who survived the first episode of acute infection, whereas the isolates in the previous study included those who died during the acute infection. The majority of B. pseudomallei isolates from the primary episode of melioidosis in this study expressed LPS smooth type A, and no association between LPS type and relapse was found. This contrasts with the findings of a previous study, in which three of 11 (27%) patients with recurrent melioidosis had different LPS types in the primary and relapse isolates 9. The finding in the previous study may relate to a small sample size. Furthermore, isolates in this previous study were not genotyped, and the possibility that recurrence was attributable to re-infection with a different isolate rather than persistence and relapse with the primary isolate was not excluded 9. The proportions of uncommon, non-type A LPS in the primary episode of melioidosis in this study (1% in cases and 2% in controls) were similar to those observed in the previous study (3%) 9. Our findings, based on a much larger number of bacterial isolates supported by a robust study design, do not provide evidence for a link between uncommon, non-type A LPS and relapse.
  12 in total

1.  A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation.

Authors:  S Stepanovic; D Vukovic; I Dakic; B Savic; M Svabic-Vlahovic
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 2.  Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease.

Authors:  Kim Lewis
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei does not correlate with biofilm formation.

Authors:  Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Cherdchai Kaewpa; Channarong Arunyanart; Pipatphong Kanla; Preecha Homchampa; Stitaya Sirisinha; Tanakorn Proungvitaya; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Recurrent melioidosis in patients in northeast Thailand is frequently due to reinfection rather than relapse.

Authors:  Bina Maharjan; Narisara Chantratita; Mongkol Vesaratchavest; Allen Cheng; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Wirongrong Chierakul; Wipada Chaowagul; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Melioidosis: a clinical overview.

Authors:  Direk Limmathurotsakul; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Growing Burkholderia pseudomallei in biofilm stimulating conditions significantly induces antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Chakrit Sawasdidoln; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Rasana W Sermswan; Unchalee Tattawasart; Sumalee Tungpradabkul; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Increasing incidence of human melioidosis in Northeast Thailand.

Authors:  Direk Limmathurotsakul; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin; Nittaya Teerawattanasook; Gumphol Wongsuvan; Seksan Chaisuksant; Ploenchan Chetchotisakd; Wipada Chaowagul; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 8.  Outcome of antimicrobial therapy in documented biofilm-associated infections: a review of the available clinical evidence.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Anastasios M Kapaskelis; Vasilios D Kouranos; Ourania K Kakisi; Zoe Athanassa; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity among Burkholderia pseudomallei from different geographic and clinical origins.

Authors:  Narisara Anuntagool; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Nicholas J White; Bart J Currie; Rasana W Sermswan; Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Sansanee C Chaiyaroj; Stitaya Sirisinha
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.345

10.  A simple scoring system to differentiate between relapse and re-infection in patients with recurrent melioidosis.

Authors:  Direk Limmathurotsakul; Wipada Chaowagul; Narisara Chantratita; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Mayurachat Biaklang; Sarinna Tumapa; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2008-10-29
View more
  13 in total

1.  Ultrastructural effects and antibiofilm activity of LFchimera against Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Aekkalak Puknun; Sakawrat Kanthawong; Chitchanok Anutrakunchai; Kamran Nazmi; Wikky Tigchelaar; Kees A Hoeben; Enno C I Veerman; Jan G M Bolscher; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Genome-scale analysis of the genes that contribute to Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation identifies a crucial exopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene cluster.

Authors:  Grace I Borlee; Brooke A Plumley; Kevin H Martin; Nawarat Somprasong; Mihnea R Mangalea; M Nurul Islam; Mary N Burtnick; Paul J Brett; Ivo Steinmetz; David P AuCoin; John T Belisle; Dean C Crick; Herbert P Schweizer; Bradley R Borlee
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-06-28

3.  Impact of nutritional stress on drug susceptibility and biofilm structures of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia thailandensis grown in static and microfluidic systems.

Authors:  Chitchanok Anutrakunchai; Jan G M Bolscher; Bastiaan P Krom; Sakawrat Kanthawong; Sorujsiri Chareonsudjai; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Antibacterial activity of chitosan against Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Watcharaporn Kamjumphol; Pisit Chareonsudjai; Sorujsiri Chareonsudjai
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Pan-drug-resistant and biofilm-producing strain of Burkholderia pseudomallei: first report of melioidosis from a diabetic patient in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Authors:  Titik Nuryastuti; Nusaibah Umaroh; Rizka Humardewayanti Asdie; Ika Puspita Sari; Ahmad Musthafa
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2018-11-09

6.  Extracellular DNA facilitates bacterial adhesion during Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation.

Authors:  Rattiyaphorn Pakkulnan; Chitchanok Anutrakunchai; Sakawrat Kanthawong; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Pisit Chareonsudjai; Sorujsiri Chareonsudjai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transcriptomics Analysis Uncovers Transient Ceftazidime Tolerance in Burkholderia Biofilms.

Authors:  Supaksorn Chattagul; Mohd M Khan; Alison J Scott; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar; Robert K Ernst; David R Goodlett; Rasana W Sermswan
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Burkholderia pseudomallei Biofilm Promotes Adhesion, Internalization and Stimulates Proinflammatory Cytokines in Human Epithelial A549 Cells.

Authors:  Chanikarn Kunyanee; Watcharaporn Kamjumphol; Suwimol Taweechaisupapong; Sakawrat Kanthawong; Suwin Wongwajana; Surasak Wongratanacheewin; Chariya Hahnvajanawong; Sorujsiri Chareonsudjai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inactivation of bpsl1039-1040 ATP-binding cassette transporter reduces intracellular survival in macrophages, biofilm formation and virulence in the murine model of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection.

Authors:  Peechanika Pinweha; Pornpan Pumirat; Jon Cuccui; Niramol Jitprasutwit; Veerachat Muangsombut; Varintip Srinon; Usa Boonyuen; Parameth Thiennimitr; Paiboon Vattanaviboon; Felipe Cia; Sam Willcocks; Gregory J Bancroft; Brendan W Wren; Sunee Korbsrisate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of temperature on Burkholderia pseudomallei growth, proteomic changes, motility and resistance to stress environments.

Authors:  Suporn Paksanont; Kitisak Sintiprungrat; Thatcha Yimthin; Pornpan Pumirat; Sharon J Peacock; Narisara Chantratita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.