Literature DB >> 24602062

Decreased delivery of inappropriate shocks achieved by remote monitoring of ICD: a substudy of the ECOST trial.

Laurence Guédon-Moreau1, Claude Kouakam, Didier Klug, Christelle Marquié, François Brigadeau, Stéphane Boulé, Hugues Blangy, Dominique Lacroix, Jacques Clémenty, Nicolas Sadoul, Salem Kacet.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate shocks remain a highly challenging complication of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). We examined whether automatic wireless remote monitoring (RM) of ICD, by providing early notifications of triggering events, lowers the incidence of inappropriate shocks. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 433 patients randomly assigned to RM (n = 221; active group) versus ambulatory follow-up (n = 212; control group). Patients in the active group were seen in the ambulatory department once a year, unless RM reported an event requiring an earlier ambulatory visit. Patients in the control group were seen in the ambulatory department every 6 months. The occurrence of first and further inappropriate shocks, and their causes in each group were compared. The characteristics of the study groups, including pharmaceutical regimens, were similar. Over a follow-up of 27 months, 5.0% of patients in the active group received ≥1 inappropriate shocks versus 10.4% in the control group (P = 0.03). A total of 28 inappropriate shocks were delivered in the active versus 283 in the control group. Shocks were triggered by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTA) in 48.5%, noise oversensing in 21.2%, T wave oversensing in 15.2%, and lead dysfunction in 15.2% of patients. The numbers of inappropriate shocks delivered per patient, triggered by SVTA and by lead dysfunction, were 74% and 98% lower, respectively, in the active than in the control group.
CONCLUSION: RM was highly effective in the long-term prevention of inappropriate ICD shocks.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implantable cardioverter defibrillator; inappropriate shock; lead dysfunction; oversensing; remote monitoring; telemedicine; supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24602062     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  18 in total

1.  [Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Is remote monitoring obligatory?].

Authors:  Fritz W Horlbeck; J O Schwab
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22

2.  Long-term incidence of inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators in clinical practice-an underestimated complication?

Authors:  Daniel Hofer; Jan Steffel; David Hürlimann; Laurent Haegeli; Thomas F Lüscher; Firat Duru; Urs Eriksson; Nazmi Krasniqi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Electrical manipulation of the failing heart.

Authors:  Valerio Zacà; Theodore Murphy; Mauro Biffi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  A prospective comparison of remote monitoring systems in implantable cardiac defibrillators: potential effects of frequency of transmissions.

Authors:  Ermenegildo de Ruvo; Luigi Sciarra; Anna Maria Martino; Marco Rebecchi; Renzo Venanzio Iulianella; Francesco Sebastiani; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alessio Borrelli; Antonio Scarà; Domenico Grieco; Claudia Tota; Federica Stirpe; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Organizational model and reactions to alerts in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A survey from the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance project.

Authors:  Gabriele Zanotto; Antonio D'Onofrio; Paolo Della Bella; Francesco Solimene; Ennio C Pisanò; Saverio Iacopino; Cristina Dondina; Daniele Giacopelli; Alessio Gargaro; Renato P Ricci
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  [Active cardiac implantable electronic devices: What is possible in ambulatory health care in 2017?]

Authors:  Karin Rybak
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-08-22

7.  Current practices in the monitoring of cardiac rhythm devices in pediatrics and congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Stacey L Boyer; Michael J Silka; Yaniv Bar-Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Remote Monitoring for Follow-up of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Renato Pietro Ricci; Loredana Morichelli; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-08-30

9.  Initial experience with telemonitoring in left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Stephan Hohmann; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker; Thorben König; Dominik Berliner; Jasmin Hanke; Günes Dogan; Anamika Chatterjee; Christina Feldmann; Bryan Lynch; Daniel Burkhoff; Axel Haverich; Johann Bauersachs; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Pacemakers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.