PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to examine the component of "personal factors" described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY. METHODS: A critical examination of the construct of "personal factors" and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria. RESULTS: The "personal factors" component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of "personal factors" is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of "personal factors" in documenting personal attributes, including "blaming the victim". CONCLUSION: In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of "personal factors" lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for "personal" or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: A central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors. As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts. As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component. Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.
PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to examine the component of "personal factors" described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY. METHODS: A critical examination of the construct of "personal factors" and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria. RESULTS: The "personal factors" component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of "personal factors" is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of "personal factors" in documenting personal attributes, including "blaming the victim". CONCLUSION: In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of "personal factors" lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for "personal" or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: A central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors. As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts. As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component. Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.
Entities:
Keywords:
Classification; ICF; ICF-CY; personal factors
Authors: Elles de Schipper; Aiko Lundequist; Anna Löfgren Wilteus; David Coghill; Petrus J de Vries; Mats Granlund; Martin Holtmann; Ulf Jonsson; Sunil Karande; Florence Levy; Omar Al-Modayfer; Luis Rohde; Rosemary Tannock; Bruce Tonge; Sven Bölte Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Candice L Osborne; Christina Petersson; James E Graham; Walter J Meyer; Rune J Simeonsson; Oscar E Suman; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Soheil Mahdi; Nadia Ronzano; Ane Knüppel; José Carlos Dias; Ayman Albdah; Lin Chien-Ho; Omar Almodayfer; Annet Bluschke; Sunil Karande; Huei-Lin Huang; Hanna Christiansen; Mats Granlund; Petrus J de Vries; David Coghill; Rosemary Tannock; Luis Rohde; Sven Bölte Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Soheil Mahdi; Katja Albertowski; Omar Almodayfer; Vaia Arsenopoulou; Sara Carucci; José Carlos Dias; Mohammad Khalil; Ane Knüppel; Anika Langmann; Marlene Briciet Lauritsen; Graccielle Rodrigues da Cunha; Tokio Uchiyama; Nicole Wolff; Melissa Selb; Mats Granlund; Petrus J de Vries; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Sven Bölte Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2018-06