Literature DB >> 24601724

Effectiveness of a new gelatin sealant system for dural closure.

Hisashi Kawai, Ichiro Nakagawa, Fumihiko Nishimura, Yasushi Motoyama, Young-Su Park, Mitsutoshi Nakamura, Hiroyuki Nakase, Shuko Suzuki, Yoshito Ikada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Watertight dural closure is imperative after neurosurgical procedures because inadequately treated leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can have serious consequences. In this study, the authors test the use of a new gelatin glue as a dural sealant in in vitro and in vivo canine models of transdural CSF leakage.
METHODS: The in vitro model was sutured semicircles of canine dura mater and artificial dural substitute. The sutures were sealed with gelatin glue (n  =  20), fibrin glue (n  =  20), or a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel sealant (n  =  20). Each sample was set in a device to measure water pressure, and pressure was increased until leakage occurred. Bonding strength was subjectively evaluated. The in vivo model was dogs who underwent dural excision and received either no sealant (control group; n  =  5) or gelatin glue sealant (n  =  5) before dural closure. Twenty-eight days post-surgery, the maximum intracranial pressure was measured at the cisterna magna using Valsalva maneuver and tissue adhesion was evaluated.
RESULTS: The water pressure at which leakage occurred in the in vitro model was higher with gelatin glue (76·5 ± 39·8 mmHg) than with fibrin glue (38·3 ± 27·4 mmHg, P < 0·001) or the PEG-based hydrogel sealant (46·3 ± 20·9 mmHg, P  =  0·007). Bonding strength was higher for the gelatin glue than fibrin glue (P < 0·001) or PEG-based hydrogel sealant (P  =  0·001). The maximum intracranial pressure in the in vivo model was higher for the gelatin glue group (59·0 ± 2·2 mmHg) than the control group (13·8 ± 4·0 mmHg, P < 0·001). Tissue adhesion was lower for the gelatin glue group than the control group (P  =  0·005). DISCUSSION: The new gelatin glue provides an effective watertight closure when used as an adjunct to sutured dural repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrospinal fluid leak,; Dural repair,; Dural sealant system,; Gelatin glue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24601724     DOI: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  6 in total

1.  Management of postoperative pseudomeningoceles: an international survey study.

Authors:  Albert Tu; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Paul Steinbok
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Histologic Comparison of the Dura Mater among Species.

Authors:  Ahmet Kinaci; Wilhelmina Bergmann; Ronald Law Bleys; Albert van der Zwan; Tristan Pc van Doormaal
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Preservation of the Myofascial Cuff During Posterior Fossa Surgery to Reduce the Rate of Pseudomeningocele Formation and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Daniel R Felbaum; Kyle Mueller; Amjad Anaizi; Robert B Mason; Walter C Jean; Jean M Voyadzis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Bacterial cellulose membranes used as artificial substitutes for dural defection in rabbits.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Xia Ma; Shiwen Chen; Meifeng Tao; Lutao Yuan; Yao Jing
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Low complication rate of sellar reconstruction by artificial dura mater during endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Yuanliang Ye; Fuyu Wang; Tao Zhou; Yi Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Integrity of dural closure after autologous platelet rich fibrin augmentation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  I Vasilikos; J Beck; S Ghanaati; J Grauvogel; T Nisyrios; K Grapatsas; U Hubbe
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.