Literature DB >> 24601648

Effect on therapeutic ratio of planning a boosted radiotherapy dose to the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion within the prostate based on multifunctional MR parameters.

S F Riches1, G S Payne, N M Desouza, D Dearnaley, V A Morgan, S C Morgan, M Partridge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of an 8-Gy focal radiation boost to a dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL), identified using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and to assess the potential outcome compared with a uniform 74-Gy prostate dose.
METHODS: The DIL location was predicted in 23 patients using a histopathologically verified model combining diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, T2 maps and three-dimensional MR spectroscopic imaging. The DIL defined prior to neoadjuvant hormone downregulation was firstly registered to MRI-acquired post-hormone therapy and subsequently to CT radiotherapy scans. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment was planned for an 8-Gy focal boost with 74-Gy dose to the remaining prostate. Areas under the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for prostate, bladder and rectum, the tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were compared with those of the uniform 74-Gy IMRT plan.
RESULTS: Deliverable IMRT plans were feasible for all patients with identifiable DILs (20/23). Areas under the DVHs were increased for the prostate (75.1 ± 0.6 vs 72.7 ± 0.3 Gy; p < 0.001) and decreased for the rectum (38.2 ± 2.5 vs 43.5 ± 2.5 Gy; p < 0.001) and the bladder (29.1 ± 9.0 vs 36.9 ± 9.3 Gy; p < 0.001) for the boosted plan. The prostate TCP was increased (80.1 ± 1.3 vs 75.3 ± 0.9 Gy; p < 0.001) and rectal NTCP lowered (3.84 ± 3.65 vs 9.70 ± 5.68 Gy; p = 0.04) in the boosted plan. The bladder NTCP was negligible for both plans.
CONCLUSION: Delivery of a focal boost to an mpMRI-defined DIL is feasible, and significant increases in TCP and therapeutic ratio were found. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The delivery of a focal boost to an mpMRI-defined DIL demonstrates statistically significant increases in TCP and therapeutic ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24601648      PMCID: PMC4075537          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  26 in total

1.  Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David Dearnaley; Isabel Syndikus; Georges Sumo; Margaret Bidmead; David Bloomfield; Catharine Clark; Annie Gao; Shama Hassan; Alan Horwich; Robert Huddart; Vincent Khoo; Peter Kirkbride; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Olivia Naismith; Chris Parker; Helen Patterson; Martin Russell; Christopher Scrase; Chris South; John Staffurth; Emma Hall
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Phased-array magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with correlation to radical prostatectomy specimens: local experience.

Authors:  Jin-Wei Kwek; Choon-Hua Thng; Puay-Hoon Tan; John Shyi-Peng Yuen; James Boon-Kheng Khoo; Swee-Tian Quek; Juliana Teng-Swan Ho; Kim-Ping Tan; Christopher Wai-Sam Cheng
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.767

3.  Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): Magnetic Resonance Imaging Workbench: analysis and visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data.

Authors:  James A d'Arcy; David J Collins; Anwar R Padhani; Simon Walker-Samuel; John Suckling; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy.

Authors:  Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Parameters for the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) for specific rectal complications observed in clinical practise.

Authors:  Sarah L Gulliford; Mike Partridge; Matthew R Sydes; Steve Webb; Philip M Evans; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Investigation of bladder dose and volume factors influencing late urinary toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Rex Cheung; Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Renaud de Crevoisier; Andrew K Lee; Steven Frank; Rajat J Kudchadker; Howard Thames; Radhe Mohan; Deborah Kuban
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial.

Authors:  Véronique Beckendorf; Stéphane Guerif; Elisabeth Le Prisé; Jean-Marc Cosset; Agnes Bougnoux; Bruno Chauvet; Naji Salem; Olivier Chapet; Sylvain Bourdain; Jean-Marc Bachaud; Philippe Maingon; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi; Luc Malissard; Jean-Marc Simon; Pascal Pommier; Men Hay; Bernard Dubray; Jean-Léon Lagrange; Elisabeth Luporsi; Pierre Bey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Gunar K Zagars; George Starkschall; John A Antolak; J Jack Lee; Eugene Huang; Andrew C von Eschenbach; Deborah A Kuban; Isaac Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Hypofractionated boost to the dominant tumor region with intensity modulated stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a sequential dose escalation pilot study.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Meritxell Mollà; Michel Rouzaud; Alberto Hidalgo; José Ignacio Toscas; Joan Lozano; Sergi Sanz; Carmen Ares; Sandra Jorcano; Dolors Linero; Lluís Escudé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Simultaneous integrated boost of biopsy proven, MRI defined dominant intra-prostatic lesions to 95 Gray with IMRT: early results of a phase I NCI study.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Peter Guion; Nancy Sears-Crouse; Karen Ullman; Sharon Smith; Paul S Albert; Gabor Fichtinger; Peter L Choyke; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Bradford J Wood; Axel Krieger; Holly Ning
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  12 in total

1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for primary prostate cancer with selective intraprostatic boost determined by 18F-choline PET/CT.

Authors:  Yu Kuang; Lili Wu; Emily Hirata; Kyle Miyazaki; Miles Sato; Sandi A Kwee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Current trends and new frontiers in focal therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Melissa H Mendez; Daniel Y Joh; Rajan Gupta; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Early Outcome of Prostate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Incorporating a Simultaneous Intra-Prostatic MRI Directed Boost.

Authors:  Michael H Schild; Steven E Schild; William W Wong; Sujay A Vora; Alvin C Silva; Annelise M Silva; Thomas B Daniels; Sameer R Keole
Journal:  OMICS J Radiol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Use of a correlation analysis model in the optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xiadong Li; Qinghua Deng; Shenglin Ma; K E Zhang; Zhibing Wu; Jianjun Lai; Rongjun Tang; Yao Ren; Jiahao Wang; Lixia Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comparison of MRI sequences in ideal fiducial maker-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Hisao Komeda; Mitsuyoshi Hattori; Shigeki Hirose; Eiichi Yama; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-11-01

6.  Changes in prostate apparent diffusion coefficient values during radiotherapy after neoadjuvant hormones.

Authors:  Andrew McPartlin; Lucy Kershaw; Alan McWilliam; Marcus Ben Taylor; Clare Hodgson; Marcel van Herk; Ananya Choudhury
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-10-11

7.  Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions.

Authors:  Matthew T Studenski; Yanisley Valenciaga; Matthew C Abramowitz; Radka Stoyanova; Elizabeth Bossart; Nesrin Dogan; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Radiotherapy planning using MRI.

Authors:  Maria A Schmidt; Geoffrey S Payne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Slice Encoding for Metal Artefact Correction in magnetic resonance imaging examinations for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Maria A Schmidt; Rafal Panek; Ruth Colgan; Julie Hughes; Aslam Sohaib; Frank Saran; Julia Murray; Jason Bernard; Patrick Revell; Mathias Nittka; Martin O Leach; Vibeke N Hansen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a new technique with high potential for the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Florian Sterzing; Clemens Kratochwil; Hannah Fiedler; Sonja Katayama; Gregor Habl; Klaus Kopka; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.